Clinical Characteristics of Early Leavers From a Private Dual-Diagnosis Program.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2024.2434434
Justin Huft, Timothy Fong, Elizabeth Hall, Farrah K Khaleghi Aizenman, Tal Leshem
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics of Early Leavers From a Private Dual-Diagnosis Program.","authors":"Justin Huft, Timothy Fong, Elizabeth Hall, Farrah K Khaleghi Aizenman, Tal Leshem","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2024.2434434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Early leaving in substance use disorder treatment may be the single largest variable undermining treatment success. Existing work on early leaving tends to explore either client factors, which include age, race, gender, and diagnoses, or treatment factors, which include the type of treatment activities offered, treatment experiences of clients and staff, treatment amenities, and environmental factors in the residential treatment program. However, existing work on both client factors and treatment factors provides mixed results on what contributes to early leaving. Further, there has been very little research in the private residential treatment setting. This study aims to explore the factors influencing early leaving in a private residential treatment setting. <b>Methods:</b> The study analyzed admission and treatment records from 247 consecutive clients at a private treatment facility in Southern California to identify factors related to shorter retention. The program employs a biopsychosocial approach and evidence-based practices to assist clients in recovery from substance use disorders and mental health conditions. We utilize a battery of client measures, including the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2, Trauma History Questionnaire, as well as demographic and psychiatric variables in our analyses. <b>Results:</b> Findings challenge previous research by showing that age and gender do not predict shorter retention, contrary to findings in the extant literature on public treatment centers. Instead, clients with higher symptoms of distress stay longer, as indicated by scores on the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2. Additionally, we find the majority of the cohort stayed in residential treatment for more than 30 days, with the average length of stay being 47.92 days, indicating that treatment completion of clients with severe symptomatology for an extended time in treatment (30 days or more) is achievable. <b>Conclusions:</b> The study underscores the importance of considering client symptomologies and severities in understanding and improving retention in substance use disorder treatment programs. This study highlights the potential impact of treatment services offered in private settings on client retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2024.2434434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Early leaving in substance use disorder treatment may be the single largest variable undermining treatment success. Existing work on early leaving tends to explore either client factors, which include age, race, gender, and diagnoses, or treatment factors, which include the type of treatment activities offered, treatment experiences of clients and staff, treatment amenities, and environmental factors in the residential treatment program. However, existing work on both client factors and treatment factors provides mixed results on what contributes to early leaving. Further, there has been very little research in the private residential treatment setting. This study aims to explore the factors influencing early leaving in a private residential treatment setting. Methods: The study analyzed admission and treatment records from 247 consecutive clients at a private treatment facility in Southern California to identify factors related to shorter retention. The program employs a biopsychosocial approach and evidence-based practices to assist clients in recovery from substance use disorders and mental health conditions. We utilize a battery of client measures, including the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2, Trauma History Questionnaire, as well as demographic and psychiatric variables in our analyses. Results: Findings challenge previous research by showing that age and gender do not predict shorter retention, contrary to findings in the extant literature on public treatment centers. Instead, clients with higher symptoms of distress stay longer, as indicated by scores on the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2. Additionally, we find the majority of the cohort stayed in residential treatment for more than 30 days, with the average length of stay being 47.92 days, indicating that treatment completion of clients with severe symptomatology for an extended time in treatment (30 days or more) is achievable. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of considering client symptomologies and severities in understanding and improving retention in substance use disorder treatment programs. This study highlights the potential impact of treatment services offered in private settings on client retention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私人双重诊断项目早期离校者的临床特征。
目的:药物使用障碍治疗中过早退出可能是影响治疗成功的最大单一变量。现有的关于提前离开的工作倾向于探索客户因素,包括年龄、种族、性别和诊断,或治疗因素,包括提供的治疗活动类型、客户和工作人员的治疗经验、治疗设施和住院治疗项目中的环境因素。然而,关于客户因素和治疗因素的现有工作提供了导致早退的不同结果。此外,关于私人住宅治疗环境的研究很少。本研究旨在探讨影响私人住宿治疗机构提早离校的因素。方法:该研究分析了来自南加州一家私人治疗机构的247名连续患者的入院和治疗记录,以确定与较短的滞留有关的因素。该方案采用生物心理社会方法和循证实践,帮助客户从物质使用障碍和精神健康状况中恢复过来。在我们的分析中,我们使用了一系列的客户测量,包括结果问卷45.2,创伤史问卷,以及人口统计学和精神病学变量。结果:研究结果挑战了先前的研究,表明年龄和性别不能预测更短的滞留时间,这与现有文献中关于公共治疗中心的研究结果相反。相反,结果问卷45.2的得分表明,抑郁症状越严重的患者停留的时间越长。此外,我们发现大多数队列的住院治疗时间超过30天,平均住院时间为47.92天,这表明有严重症状的患者在延长的治疗时间(30天或更长)内完成治疗是可以实现的。结论:该研究强调了在理解和改善药物使用障碍治疗方案中考虑病人症状和严重程度的重要性。这项研究强调了在私人环境中提供的治疗服务对客户保留的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes and Challenges of Motivational Interviewing in Dual Diagnosis Treatment-A Systematic Review. Highlights for the Journal of Dual Diagnosis from 2024. Clinical Characteristics of Early Leavers From a Private Dual-Diagnosis Program. Co-Occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Research Among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: A Systematic Review. The Role of Functional Health Literacy in Terms of Hazardous Alcohol Use in Adults with Probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1