{"title":"[Christmas article: Importance of seniority and daily variation for the flattening of academic medical language].","authors":"Rasmus Hvidbjerg Gantzel, Henning Grønbæk","doi":"10.61409/V20248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the medical community Greek and Latin form a cornerstone of our daily professional communication. The use of correct terminology is under pressure, although the extent of incorrect terminology is unknown, particularly regarding the Greek suffix »-itis«, which indicates inflammation. It has been observed that the correct »-itis« suffix is being reduced to »-it« (e.g., »hepatitis« vs. »hepatit«).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the extent of this based on observations from medical conferences in the Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Senior doctors more often use »-itis« correctly compared to junior doctors (59 vs. 39%), but there is generally room for improvement in both groups. A significant difference is observed between morning and midday conferences, with more errors occurring in the morning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a tendency toward a reduction in the use of the »-itis« suffix, which can negatively impact clinical communication and patient safety. The study suggests targeted efforts to maintain correct linguistic practices in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None, con amore.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":23428,"journal":{"name":"Ugeskrift for laeger","volume":"186 50","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ugeskrift for laeger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/V20248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In the medical community Greek and Latin form a cornerstone of our daily professional communication. The use of correct terminology is under pressure, although the extent of incorrect terminology is unknown, particularly regarding the Greek suffix »-itis«, which indicates inflammation. It has been observed that the correct »-itis« suffix is being reduced to »-it« (e.g., »hepatitis« vs. »hepatit«).
Methods: We investigated the extent of this based on observations from medical conferences in the Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Results: Senior doctors more often use »-itis« correctly compared to junior doctors (59 vs. 39%), but there is generally room for improvement in both groups. A significant difference is observed between morning and midday conferences, with more errors occurring in the morning.
Conclusion: There is a tendency toward a reduction in the use of the »-itis« suffix, which can negatively impact clinical communication and patient safety. The study suggests targeted efforts to maintain correct linguistic practices in clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
The Ulster Medical Journal is an international general medical journal with contributions on all areas of medical and surgical specialties relevant to a general medical readership. It retains a focus on material relevant to the health of the Northern Ireland population. The Honorary Editor would welcome offers of papers for publication. Prospective authors are invited to read the notice to contributors.