Neurorights Training of a Multidisciplinary Studentship Based on Realistic Neuroscience.

Q1 Neuroscience AJOB Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1080/21507740.2024.2424602
José M Muñoz, Javier Bernacer
{"title":"Neurorights Training of a Multidisciplinary Studentship Based on Realistic Neuroscience.","authors":"José M Muñoz, Javier Bernacer","doi":"10.1080/21507740.2024.2424602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As is usually the case with other topics addressed by neuroethics, a rigorous analysis of neurorights requires an interdisciplinary approach. In response to this need and in the context of the global expansion of regulatory initiatives on neurorights, we coordinated, under the auspices of the International Center for Neuroscience and Ethics (CINET), an introductory course on neurorights from a neuroscientific perspective. The course, aimed at sixty students from diverse backgrounds (neuroscience, psychology, and law, among others), consisted of a 10-hr training that showed the current approaches and discussions on neurorights and outlined cutting-edge technologies to register, analyze, and manipulate human brain activity from a realistic stance. The course succeeded in discarding some concerns and uncovering others not frequently found in the neurorights discussions. The most pressing issues identified were protecting brain data privacy, combating bias in algorithms used in neurotechnology, and improving informed consent mechanisms for interventions with invasive neuroscientific techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":39022,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"60-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2024.2424602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As is usually the case with other topics addressed by neuroethics, a rigorous analysis of neurorights requires an interdisciplinary approach. In response to this need and in the context of the global expansion of regulatory initiatives on neurorights, we coordinated, under the auspices of the International Center for Neuroscience and Ethics (CINET), an introductory course on neurorights from a neuroscientific perspective. The course, aimed at sixty students from diverse backgrounds (neuroscience, psychology, and law, among others), consisted of a 10-hr training that showed the current approaches and discussions on neurorights and outlined cutting-edge technologies to register, analyze, and manipulate human brain activity from a realistic stance. The course succeeded in discarding some concerns and uncovering others not frequently found in the neurorights discussions. The most pressing issues identified were protecting brain data privacy, combating bias in algorithms used in neurotechnology, and improving informed consent mechanisms for interventions with invasive neuroscientific techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于现实神经科学的多学科学生神经权利训练。
就像神经伦理学通常讨论的其他主题一样,对神经权利的严格分析需要跨学科的方法。为了应对这一需求,并在全球范围内扩大对神经权利的监管举措的背景下,我们在国际神经科学与伦理学中心(CINET)的主持下,协调了一门从神经科学角度看神经权利的入门课程。这门课程的目标是60名来自不同背景(神经科学、心理学和法律等)的学生,包括10小时的培训,展示了当前关于神经权利的方法和讨论,并概述了从现实的角度记录、分析和操纵人类大脑活动的尖端技术。该课程成功地抛弃了一些问题,并揭示了在神经权利讨论中不经常发现的其他问题。确定的最紧迫的问题是保护大脑数据隐私,打击神经技术中使用的算法中的偏见,以及改进侵入性神经科学技术干预的知情同意机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Deep Brain Stimulation and Neuropsychiatric Anthropology - The "Prosthetisability" of the Lifeworld. Review of Psychedelic Outlaws: The Movement Revolutionizing Modern Medicine, by Joanna Kemper. Mental Health Conditions Between Neurodiversity and the Medical Model. Neurorights Training of a Multidisciplinary Studentship Based on Realistic Neuroscience. Beyond Binary Models: A Bioethical Inquiry Into Neurodiversity and the Medical Framework in Mental Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1