Factors Associated With Nonattendance for Osteoporosis Evaluation Following Fragility Fracture.

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joos/5602020
Thany Seyok, Jamie E Collins, Cole Hodys, Samantha J Erikson, Samantha Perez Menendez, Brandon E Earp, Julia F Charles
{"title":"Factors Associated With Nonattendance for Osteoporosis Evaluation Following Fragility Fracture.","authors":"Thany Seyok, Jamie E Collins, Cole Hodys, Samantha J Erikson, Samantha Perez Menendez, Brandon E Earp, Julia F Charles","doi":"10.1155/joos/5602020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study assessed patient demographic factors associated with nonattendance for osteoporosis evaluation after being referred to our Bone Health Clinic (BHC), a hospital-based outpatient Fracture Liaison Service (FLS), for a fragility fracture. <b>Methods:</b> 507 patients sustaining a fragility fracture were referred to the BHC over a 39-month period. Retrospective chart review was conducted to capture osteoporosis evaluation attendance rates and demographic factors (age, gender, race, area deprivation index, insurance type, and fracture type). A post-fracture follow-up visit with either the BHC or another provider in which osteoporosis was noted in the assessment was considered attendance for osteoporosis evaluation. Nonattendance was determined at a cutoff of one year after the fracture date. <b>Results:</b> Of the 507 patients referred to the BHC following a fragility fracture, 177 patients attended osteoporosis evaluation with either the BHC or a primary care provider. Nonattendance was associated with older age (<i>p</i>=0.0075), having private health insurance (<i>p</i>=0.0434), and recent hip fracture (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Attendance was associated with having government health insurance (<i>p</i>=0.0103). <b>Conclusion:</b> Inpatient evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis should be considered in patients who are older or have sustained a hip fracture as they may have more difficulty attending post-fracture appointments.</p>","PeriodicalId":45384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteoporosis","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5602020"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joos/5602020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study assessed patient demographic factors associated with nonattendance for osteoporosis evaluation after being referred to our Bone Health Clinic (BHC), a hospital-based outpatient Fracture Liaison Service (FLS), for a fragility fracture. Methods: 507 patients sustaining a fragility fracture were referred to the BHC over a 39-month period. Retrospective chart review was conducted to capture osteoporosis evaluation attendance rates and demographic factors (age, gender, race, area deprivation index, insurance type, and fracture type). A post-fracture follow-up visit with either the BHC or another provider in which osteoporosis was noted in the assessment was considered attendance for osteoporosis evaluation. Nonattendance was determined at a cutoff of one year after the fracture date. Results: Of the 507 patients referred to the BHC following a fragility fracture, 177 patients attended osteoporosis evaluation with either the BHC or a primary care provider. Nonattendance was associated with older age (p=0.0075), having private health insurance (p=0.0434), and recent hip fracture (p < 0.0001). Attendance was associated with having government health insurance (p=0.0103). Conclusion: Inpatient evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis should be considered in patients who are older or have sustained a hip fracture as they may have more difficulty attending post-fracture appointments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脆性骨折后不参加骨质疏松评估的相关因素。
简介:本研究评估了在我们的骨骼健康诊所(BHC),一个基于医院的门诊骨折联络服务(FLS),因脆性骨折而未参加骨质疏松症评估的患者人口统计学因素。方法:在39个月的时间里,507例持续性脆性骨折患者被转诊到BHC。进行回顾性图表回顾,以获取骨质疏松评估出勤率和人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族、地区剥夺指数、保险类型和骨折类型)。骨折后与BHC或其他提供者的随访,如果在评估中发现骨质疏松症,则视为参加骨质疏松症评估。在骨折后1年确定不参加治疗。结果:在507例脆性骨折患者中,177例患者参加了BHC或初级保健提供者的骨质疏松评估。不出勤与年龄较大(p=0.0075)、拥有私人健康保险(p=0.0434)和近期髋部骨折(p < 0.0001)相关。出勤与政府医疗保险相关(p=0.0103)。结论:骨质疏松症的住院评估和治疗应考虑到老年人或髋部骨折患者,因为他们可能更难以参加骨折后的预约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Nonattendance for Osteoporosis Evaluation Following Fragility Fracture. The Effects of Switch Therapy in Osteoporosis Treatment after Romosozumab after Comparing with Prior Treatment Quantitative MR Analysis of Changes in the Radius Bone Marrow in Osteoporosis. Skeletal Manifestations, Bone Pain, and BMD Changes in Albanian Type 1 Gaucher Patients Treated with Taliglucerase Alfa Osteoporosis Screening Disparities among Ethnic and Racial Minorities: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1