The Power of The (First) Name: Do name tags for operating room staff improve effective communication and patient safety? A proof-of-concept study from an academic medical center in Germany.

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY Patient Safety in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1186/s13037-024-00418-8
Alexander D Bungert, Jan Philipp Ramspott, Carsten Szardenings, Alina Knipping, Benjamin Struecker, Andreas Pascher, Jens Peter Hoelzen
{"title":"The Power of The (First) Name: Do name tags for operating room staff improve effective communication and patient safety? A proof-of-concept study from an academic medical center in Germany.","authors":"Alexander D Bungert, Jan Philipp Ramspott, Carsten Szardenings, Alina Knipping, Benjamin Struecker, Andreas Pascher, Jens Peter Hoelzen","doi":"10.1186/s13037-024-00418-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective and reliable communication is the cornerstone of safe communication in the operating room (OR). The OR is one of the most dynamic places in the hospital where multiple disciplines must work together in perfect harmony to ultimately improve patient outcomes. To create familiarity by name regarding constantly changing team members, individual name tagging was implemented in the OR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed the impact of name tagging in the OR in a proof-of-concept study. Name tags (either first or last name), coloured according to the specific department, have been placed on the cap since March 13, 2023. On May 26, 2023, a total of 440 anaesthesiologists, general, visceral, and trauma surgeons, nurses, and service staff were invited to answer an evaluation questionnaire of nine questions. The survey period ended on August 7, 2023. 101 people answered the query which, among other things, asked for overall ratings, compliance, evaluation of specific items as well as positive and negative aspects. Statistical analyses were performed using R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the interviewed staff rated the implementation of name tagging positively (median=3.4; scale from 1-5, 1=bad, 5=good). The greatest benefit was seen in communication in general, direct contact with colleagues, and delegation of tasks. Most of the staff (>90 %) adhered to the new project and used it regularly. Negative aspects mentioned included potential loss of sterility, loss of respectability, and environmental impact. Potential for improvement was seen in the bonding method of attachment or in the implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual name tagging in the OR can improve interprofessional communication and is one tool to enhance patient safety by decreasing reservations or intimidations towards previously unknown colleagues. More studies are required to determine long-term effects on patient safety, outcome, or employee satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-024-00418-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective and reliable communication is the cornerstone of safe communication in the operating room (OR). The OR is one of the most dynamic places in the hospital where multiple disciplines must work together in perfect harmony to ultimately improve patient outcomes. To create familiarity by name regarding constantly changing team members, individual name tagging was implemented in the OR.

Methods: We analysed the impact of name tagging in the OR in a proof-of-concept study. Name tags (either first or last name), coloured according to the specific department, have been placed on the cap since March 13, 2023. On May 26, 2023, a total of 440 anaesthesiologists, general, visceral, and trauma surgeons, nurses, and service staff were invited to answer an evaluation questionnaire of nine questions. The survey period ended on August 7, 2023. 101 people answered the query which, among other things, asked for overall ratings, compliance, evaluation of specific items as well as positive and negative aspects. Statistical analyses were performed using R.

Results: Most of the interviewed staff rated the implementation of name tagging positively (median=3.4; scale from 1-5, 1=bad, 5=good). The greatest benefit was seen in communication in general, direct contact with colleagues, and delegation of tasks. Most of the staff (>90 %) adhered to the new project and used it regularly. Negative aspects mentioned included potential loss of sterility, loss of respectability, and environmental impact. Potential for improvement was seen in the bonding method of attachment or in the implementation.

Conclusion: Individual name tagging in the OR can improve interprofessional communication and is one tool to enhance patient safety by decreasing reservations or intimidations towards previously unknown colleagues. More studies are required to determine long-term effects on patient safety, outcome, or employee satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(第一个)名字的力量:手术室工作人员的姓名标签能提高有效的沟通和病人的安全吗?一项来自德国学术医疗中心的概念验证研究。
背景:有效、可靠的沟通是手术室安全沟通的基石。手术室是医院中最具活力的地方之一,多个学科必须完美和谐地协同工作,最终改善患者的治疗效果。为了根据不断变化的团队成员的名字创建熟悉度,在OR中实现了个人名称标记。方法:我们在一项概念验证研究中分析了名称标签在手术室中的影响。从2023年3月13日起,帽子上的姓名标签(名字或姓氏)会根据具体部门的颜色而有所不同。2023年5月26日,共有440名麻醉师、普通外科医生、内脏外科医生和创伤外科医生、护士和服务人员被邀请回答了一份包含9个问题的评估问卷。调查期于2023年8月7日结束。101人回答了这个问题,其中包括总体评分、依从性、对具体项目的评价以及积极和消极方面的问题。结果:大多数受访员工对姓名标签的实施持肯定态度(中位数=3.4;从1-5分,1=差,5=好)。最大的好处体现在一般的沟通、与同事的直接接触和任务委派上。大多数员工(约90%)坚持使用新项目并定期使用。所提到的负面因素包括潜在的不育性丧失、体面性丧失和环境影响。改进的潜力在连接的粘合方法或在执行中被看到。结论:在手术室中使用个人姓名标签可以改善专业间的沟通,是一种通过减少对以前不认识的同事的保留或恐吓来提高患者安全的工具。需要更多的研究来确定对患者安全、结果或员工满意度的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols vs. traditional perioperative care on patient outcomes after colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Medical negligence compensation claims in knee meniscal surgery in Norway: a cross-sectional study. Exploring strategies to enhance patient safety in spine surgery: a review. Does the AO/OTA fracture classification dictate the anesthesia modality for the surgical management of unstable distal radius fractures? - A retrospective cohort study in 127 patients managed by general vs. regional anesthesia. Predicting loss of independence among geriatric patients following gastrointestinal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1