Does the AO/OTA fracture classification dictate the anesthesia modality for the surgical management of unstable distal radius fractures? - A retrospective cohort study in 127 patients managed by general vs. regional anesthesia.

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY Patient Safety in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s13037-024-00423-x
Sascha Halvachizadeh, Merav Dreifuss, Thomas Rauer, Anne Kaiser, Dirk Ubmann, Hans-Christoph Pape, Florin Allemann
{"title":"Does the AO/OTA fracture classification dictate the anesthesia modality for the surgical management of unstable distal radius fractures? - A retrospective cohort study in 127 patients managed by general vs. regional anesthesia.","authors":"Sascha Halvachizadeh, Merav Dreifuss, Thomas Rauer, Anne Kaiser, Dirk Ubmann, Hans-Christoph Pape, Florin Allemann","doi":"10.1186/s13037-024-00423-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regional anesthesia increases in popularity in orthopaedic surgery. It is usually applied in elective surgeries of the extremities. The aim of this study was to assess indication of the use of general anesthesia in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing surgical fixation for distal radius fractures between January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2021, were included. Exclusion criteria encompassed incomplete 12-month follow-up, transferred or multiply injured patients, those with prior upper limb fractures, or admission for revision surgeries. Patients were categorized by anesthesia type: GA or plexus block anesthesia (PA). Primary outcomes comprised tourniquet utilization and duration of surgery, while secondary outcomes encompassed complications (e.g., complex regional pain syndrome [CRPS], local wound infection, implant removal necessity) and range of motion at three, six, and twelve months post-surgery. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 127 patients, with 90 (70.9%) in Group GA and 37 (29.1%) in Group PA. Mean patient age was 56.95 (± 18.59) years, with comparable demographics and fracture distribution between groups. Group GA exhibited higher tourniquet usage (96.7% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.029) and longer surgery durations (85.17 ± 37.8 min vs. 65.0 ± 23.0 min, p = 0.013). Complication rates were comparable, Group GA 12.2% versus Group PA 5.4% p = 0.407, OR 2.44; 95%CI 0.51 to 11.58, p = 0.343). Short-term functional outcomes favored Group PA at three months (e.g., Pronation: 81.1° ± 13.6 vs. 74.3° ± 17.5, p = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Solely classifying distal radius fractures does not dictate anesthesia choice. Complexity of injury, anticipated surgery duration, less use of tourniquet, and rehabilitation duration may guide regional anesthesia utilization over GA in distal radius fracture fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-024-00423-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Regional anesthesia increases in popularity in orthopaedic surgery. It is usually applied in elective surgeries of the extremities. The aim of this study was to assess indication of the use of general anesthesia in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.

Methods: Patients undergoing surgical fixation for distal radius fractures between January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2021, were included. Exclusion criteria encompassed incomplete 12-month follow-up, transferred or multiply injured patients, those with prior upper limb fractures, or admission for revision surgeries. Patients were categorized by anesthesia type: GA or plexus block anesthesia (PA). Primary outcomes comprised tourniquet utilization and duration of surgery, while secondary outcomes encompassed complications (e.g., complex regional pain syndrome [CRPS], local wound infection, implant removal necessity) and range of motion at three, six, and twelve months post-surgery. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA system.

Results: The study enrolled 127 patients, with 90 (70.9%) in Group GA and 37 (29.1%) in Group PA. Mean patient age was 56.95 (± 18.59) years, with comparable demographics and fracture distribution between groups. Group GA exhibited higher tourniquet usage (96.7% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.029) and longer surgery durations (85.17 ± 37.8 min vs. 65.0 ± 23.0 min, p = 0.013). Complication rates were comparable, Group GA 12.2% versus Group PA 5.4% p = 0.407, OR 2.44; 95%CI 0.51 to 11.58, p = 0.343). Short-term functional outcomes favored Group PA at three months (e.g., Pronation: 81.1° ± 13.6 vs. 74.3° ± 17.5, p = 0.046).

Conclusion: Solely classifying distal radius fractures does not dictate anesthesia choice. Complexity of injury, anticipated surgery duration, less use of tourniquet, and rehabilitation duration may guide regional anesthesia utilization over GA in distal radius fracture fixation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AO/OTA骨折分类是否决定了手术治疗不稳定桡骨远端骨折的麻醉方式?- 127例全麻与区域麻醉患者的回顾性队列研究。
导读:区域麻醉在骨科手术中越来越受欢迎。它通常应用于四肢的选择性手术。本研究的目的是评估全身麻醉在桡骨远端骨折手术治疗中的适应症。方法:纳入2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间接受桡骨远端骨折手术固定的患者。排除标准包括不完整的12个月随访,转移或多次受伤的患者,先前有上肢骨折的患者,或接受翻修手术的患者。根据麻醉方式对患者进行分类:GA或神经丛阻滞麻醉(PA)。主要结果包括止血带的使用和手术时间,而次要结果包括术后3、6和12个月的并发症(如复杂区域疼痛综合征[CRPS]、局部伤口感染、植入物移除的必要性)和活动范围。采用AO/OTA系统对裂缝进行分类。结果:共纳入127例患者,GA组90例(70.9%),PA组37例(29.1%)。患者平均年龄为56.95(±18.59)岁,两组间的人口统计学和骨折分布相似。GA组止血带使用率较高(96.7%比83.8%,p = 0.029),手术时间较长(85.17±37.8 min比65.0±23.0 min, p = 0.013)。并发症发生率具有可比性,GA组12.2% vs PA组5.4% p = 0.407, OR 2.44;95%CI 0.51 ~ 11.58, p = 0.343)。短期功能结果在三个月时PA组更有利(例如,旋前:81.1°±13.6对74.3°±17.5,p = 0.046)。结论:单纯对桡骨远端骨折进行分类并不能决定麻醉的选择。损伤的复杂性、预期的手术时间、较少使用止血带和康复时间可以指导区域麻醉在桡骨远端骨折固定中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols vs. traditional perioperative care on patient outcomes after colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Medical negligence compensation claims in knee meniscal surgery in Norway: a cross-sectional study. Exploring strategies to enhance patient safety in spine surgery: a review. Does the AO/OTA fracture classification dictate the anesthesia modality for the surgical management of unstable distal radius fractures? - A retrospective cohort study in 127 patients managed by general vs. regional anesthesia. Predicting loss of independence among geriatric patients following gastrointestinal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1