{"title":"Articles of Public Interest","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/acer.15506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Among young adults who frequently use cannabis, drinking alcohol is linked to intensified cannabis cravings in men and reduced cannabis cravings in women, a novel study suggests. The findings potentially illuminate mechanisms driving the combined use of the two substances and could inform sex-specific approaches to preventing or addressing the resulting harms. Young adults commonly use alcohol and cannabis together (i.e., co-use), and people who use both substances experience more negative consequences—including worse outcomes for alcohol use disorder treatment—than those who use one or the other. Co-use may be partially driven “cross-substance-induced” craving, in which the repeated co-use of two substances prompts one to become a trigger for the other. Research on this effect involving alcohol and cannabis—previously limited to laboratory testing and remote monitoring—has hinted at sex differences in these effects. For the study in <i>Alcohol: Clinical Experimental Research</i>, investigators explored cross-substance craving in daily life contexts, the first study of its kind.</p><p>Researchers worked with 63 young adults (aged 18–21, predominantly White) who used cannabis frequently. Across two weeks, participants reported their alcohol use and cannabis cravings multiple times each day, a method known as ecological momentary assessment, which yielded more than 3400 reports. Using statistical analysis, the researchers explored whether drinking was associated with stronger cannabis cravings. They also examined the influence of sex and the amount of drinks consumed on this effect.</p><p>Overall, participants used cannabis about 6 days a week and alcohol 2 days a week. Co-use occurred on 27% of days, with similar rates reported by men and women. Among men, drinking alcohol was linked to higher cannabis cravings, implying that the use of alcohol enhanced their desire for cannabis. When women drank, however, they reported somewhat reduced cannabis cravings (this effect was not significant). Levels of alcohol use did not affect men's cannabis cravings, although higher alcohol consumption was linked to more significant reductions in the desire for cannabis among women.</p><p>These findings may reflect differing motives for co-use based on sex. Young men often use substances for social reasons and to enhance positive feelings. In these cases, using one substance may amplify the desire for another to intensify the “high.” In contrast, young women are more likely than men to use substances to cope with negative emotions. For them, one substance may suffice to fulfill this function, reducing the need for additional substance use. Alternatively, young women may consciously seek to avoid the negative consequences of combining substances, which can include sexual assault.</p><p>Alcohol and cannabis co-use are likely to continue to increase as cannabis laws become more permissive, and young men may be especially vulnerable to negative outcomes due to heightened susceptibility to cross-substance craving. In contrast, young women may use substances more on a substitution, rather than complementary, basis. As such, restricting cannabis access might lead women to shift toward greater alcohol use instead. This highlights a challenge for policies: efforts to reduce risk for one group could inadvertently increase harm for another. These findings may not generalize to other demographics or to young people who use alcohol and cannabis less frequently. Further research is needed in diverse populations and communities with varying substance use policies.</p><p>Alcohol use and cannabis craving in daily life: Sex differences and associations among young adults. C. Davis, N.E. Ramer, L. Squeglia, K. Gex, A. McRae, S. McKee, W. Roberts, K.M. Gray, N.L. Baker, R. Tomko. (https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15461)</p><p>Moderate alcohol use does not reduce cardiometabolic disease risk among veterans of European, African, or Hispanic ancestry, a new study suggests. The findings add to growing evidence that traditional research methods applied to drinking levels and certain disease outcomes have created illusory and misleading results. Heavy drinking is known to be linked to coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Traditional observational studies have, however, associated moderate drinking with the lowest risk and abstinence with a moderate risk (the U-curve or J-curve effect). In recent years, the U-curve has been increasingly attributed to confounding errors—when study results are distorted by other factors. In this case, the abstinence category is implicated since it establishes a false equivalence between study participants with widely differing risk factors (lifelong non-drinkers, those who stopped drinking for health or other alcohol-related problems, and those who falsely reported not drinking). Scientists have become able to control for these and other confounders using Mendelian randomization (MR), which draws on genetic data to explore disease risk. Most MR studies—largely limited to people of Asian and European origin—have found no link between moderate alcohol use and CHD or T2D, though some suggest a raised risk. For the study in <i>Alcohol: Clinical & Experimental Research</i>, investigators applied old and new analytical methods to a large, diverse data pool of US veterans.</p><p>Researchers worked with participants from the Million Veteran Program (MVP), which incorporates genetic information, alcohol exposure data, and electronic health records. The researchers identified more than 33,000 patients with CHD diagnoses, whom they matched to 165,000 controls without CHD, with a median age of 61% and 97% male. Seventy-four percent were European American, 18% African American, and 6% Hispanic American. There were more than 28,000 patients with T2D, matched to 141,000 controls without T2D, with a median age of 59, 93% male, and 65% European American, 25% African American, and 8% Hispanic American. They performed both observational and MR analyses exploring the relationship between alcohol consumption, CHD, and T2D. The models accounted for demographic factors, blood pressure, smoking, and other factors. For ancestry groups of sufficient size, genetic risk scores linked to alcohol use, blood pressure, and smoking were incorporated.</p><p>The observational analysis yielded the familiar U-shaped curve linking alcohol use with CHD and T2D among European and African Americans—but not among Hispanic Americans, a much smaller sample. The MR analysis of the full sample found no evidence of drinking level as a causal risk factor for CHD or T2D. This was the case when working with variants of ADH1B, a gene with well-established links to alcohol use, and when using genetic risk scores based on other relevant variants (for European Americans). Adjusting for the effects of blood pressure and smoking similarly showed no link between alcohol use and cardiometabolic disease risk.</p><p>This study provides persuasive additional evidence that moderate drinking is not protective against cardiometabolic disease and that the U-shaped curve is a product of confounding errors. It provides the most extensive exploration to date of the relationship between drinking level and CHD and T2D in African American and Hispanic American populations. Additional MR analysis is needed involving larger samples of non-European populations.</p><p>A Mendelian randomization study of alcohol use and cardiometabolic disease risk in a multi-ancestry population from the VA Million Veteran Program. R. Kember, C. Rentsch, J. Lynch, M. Vujkovic, B. Voight, A. Justice, T. L. Assimes, H. Kranzler. (https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15445)</p><p>An early-stage study has found that a drug commonly prescribed for diabetes may prove to help treat people with alcohol use disorder. The study, published in <i>Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research</i>, found that the diabetes drug metformin reduced alcohol intake in mice. While more research is needed to determine whether metformin can be effective in treating humans with alcohol use disorder, the findings suggest a potential for improved options for affordable, effective treatment through the repurposing of currently available medications.</p><p>Using mice selectively bred for reaching high blood alcohol levels, researchers conducted a number of experiments to examine the effects of metformin on acute and chronic binge-like levels of alcohol consumption.</p><p>Metformin was found to reduce both acute and chronic binge-like consumption of alcohol in the mice. In one experiment, the mice were given access to alcohol, water, and saccharin. The mice that received metformin prior to having access to the alcohol consumed less alcohol than those that did not receive the metformin. The metformin did not affect the mice's intake of the other fluids. Another experiment showed that reductions in alcohol intake were not due to increased clearance of ethanol from the bloodstream; metformin had no effect on how the body breaks down alcohol in the body.</p><p>Based on prior studies, the researchers had hypothesized that a particular enzyme was influenced by ethanol and metformin and responsible for the reductions in alcohol consumption. They examined the levels and activity of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, or AMPK, an enzyme that is sensitive to alcohol and is considered to be involved in neural processes, including learning, memory, and motivation. However, metformin and ethanol appeared to have no effect on AMPK in this study.</p><p>The experiments showed no differences in effects between male and female mice, but prior studies have shown sex differences in effects, and human females have higher rates of adverse reactions to metformin. Given the small samples in this study, more rigorous research is needed to evaluate the effects and side effects on different populations. The study authors recommend additional research on dosing and the effects of metformin on the consequences of harmful drinking, such as cognitive impairments.</p><p>Alcohol use disorder costs the United States $250 billion and more than 175,000 lives each year. Metformin is an already FDA-approved drug that is shown to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective in Type 2 diabetes. It has also been shown to be protective against several neurological disorders. The researchers recommend further study on metformin as a treatment for alcohol use disorder, which could improve accessible, effective, and equitable treatment for people with alcohol use disorders. While they examined metformin as a standalone treatment, they also point to the potential to combine metformin with existing medications for alcohol use disorder to boost their effectiveness.</p><p>Effects of metformin on binge-like ethanol drinking and adenosine monophosphate kinase signaling in inbred High Drinking in the Dark - Line 1 mice. K. Grigsby, J. Palacios Aragon, A.E. Chan, S. Spencer, A. Ozburn. (https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15460)</p><p>Half of 18- to 25-year-olds believe that the average young adult drives or rides in a car at least once a month while the driver is under the influence of alcohol and cannabis. Yet, seventy percent believe that both driving and riding in a car while the driver is under the influence of both alcohol and cannabis is totally unacceptable, and three percent of young adults report driving under the simultaneous influence of alcohol and cannabis, according to a study just published in <i>Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research</i>. The findings indicate that perceptions of social norms may sway young adults’ behavior related to driving under the influence of alcohol and cannabis differently than they do for alcohol alone and may inform strategies to reduce driving under the influence of alcohol and cannabis.</p><p>The study analyzed data from a cohort of two thousand 18- to 25-year-olds in Washington State to understand the associations between perceived social norms and self-reported behaviors related to driving or riding in a car while the driver is under the influence of alcohol and cannabis.</p><p>The findings showed a statistically significant positive association between the perceived social acceptability of driving under the influence of both alcohol and cannabis, as well as of riding with a driver who is under the influence of both substances and the likelihood of engaging in that behavior oneself. Perceptions of how common it is for other people to ride in a car while the driver is under the influence of both cannabis and alcohol were positively associated with the likelihood of doing so oneself.</p><p>The researchers did not find a significant association between perceptions of how common it was for other young adults to drive under the influence of both cannabis and alcohol and the individual's likelihood to do so. This finding was unexpected, as prior studies on alcohol have found perceptions of alcohol use by peers to be linked to one's own alcohol use.</p><p>For the study, participants were asked whether, in the prior 30 days, they had driven within three hours of using alcohol or cannabis or ridden in a car with someone who had. Twelve percent said they drove after using cannabis, and 20 percent said they rode with someone who had used cannabis. With regard to alcohol, 12 percent said they drove under the influence, and 11 percent were passengers in a car with an alcohol-impaired driver.</p><p>The rates of driving after using both alcohol and cannabis were lower–three percent for driving while impaired and five percent for riding with an impaired driver. However, simultaneous use of cannabis and alcohol seems to create greater impairment than either substance individually, with an estimated ten percent higher risk of accidents compared to driving under the influence of alcohol alone. Previous studies have found that many people perceive driving after cannabis use to be safer than driving after alcohol use.</p><p>The study highlights the discrepancy between perceived social norms and behavior and supports the need for efforts to reduce driving while impaired by the simultaneous use of alcohol and cannabis.</p><p>Young adult DUI behavior and perceived norms of driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use. B. Hultgren, M. Delawalla, V. Szydlowski, K. Guttmannova, J. Cadigan, J. Kilmer, C. Lee, M. Larimer. (https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15459)</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"48 12","pages":"2206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.15506","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Among young adults who frequently use cannabis, drinking alcohol is linked to intensified cannabis cravings in men and reduced cannabis cravings in women, a novel study suggests. The findings potentially illuminate mechanisms driving the combined use of the two substances and could inform sex-specific approaches to preventing or addressing the resulting harms. Young adults commonly use alcohol and cannabis together (i.e., co-use), and people who use both substances experience more negative consequences—including worse outcomes for alcohol use disorder treatment—than those who use one or the other. Co-use may be partially driven “cross-substance-induced” craving, in which the repeated co-use of two substances prompts one to become a trigger for the other. Research on this effect involving alcohol and cannabis—previously limited to laboratory testing and remote monitoring—has hinted at sex differences in these effects. For the study in Alcohol: Clinical Experimental Research, investigators explored cross-substance craving in daily life contexts, the first study of its kind.
Researchers worked with 63 young adults (aged 18–21, predominantly White) who used cannabis frequently. Across two weeks, participants reported their alcohol use and cannabis cravings multiple times each day, a method known as ecological momentary assessment, which yielded more than 3400 reports. Using statistical analysis, the researchers explored whether drinking was associated with stronger cannabis cravings. They also examined the influence of sex and the amount of drinks consumed on this effect.
Overall, participants used cannabis about 6 days a week and alcohol 2 days a week. Co-use occurred on 27% of days, with similar rates reported by men and women. Among men, drinking alcohol was linked to higher cannabis cravings, implying that the use of alcohol enhanced their desire for cannabis. When women drank, however, they reported somewhat reduced cannabis cravings (this effect was not significant). Levels of alcohol use did not affect men's cannabis cravings, although higher alcohol consumption was linked to more significant reductions in the desire for cannabis among women.
These findings may reflect differing motives for co-use based on sex. Young men often use substances for social reasons and to enhance positive feelings. In these cases, using one substance may amplify the desire for another to intensify the “high.” In contrast, young women are more likely than men to use substances to cope with negative emotions. For them, one substance may suffice to fulfill this function, reducing the need for additional substance use. Alternatively, young women may consciously seek to avoid the negative consequences of combining substances, which can include sexual assault.
Alcohol and cannabis co-use are likely to continue to increase as cannabis laws become more permissive, and young men may be especially vulnerable to negative outcomes due to heightened susceptibility to cross-substance craving. In contrast, young women may use substances more on a substitution, rather than complementary, basis. As such, restricting cannabis access might lead women to shift toward greater alcohol use instead. This highlights a challenge for policies: efforts to reduce risk for one group could inadvertently increase harm for another. These findings may not generalize to other demographics or to young people who use alcohol and cannabis less frequently. Further research is needed in diverse populations and communities with varying substance use policies.
Alcohol use and cannabis craving in daily life: Sex differences and associations among young adults. C. Davis, N.E. Ramer, L. Squeglia, K. Gex, A. McRae, S. McKee, W. Roberts, K.M. Gray, N.L. Baker, R. Tomko. (https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15461)
Moderate alcohol use does not reduce cardiometabolic disease risk among veterans of European, African, or Hispanic ancestry, a new study suggests. The findings add to growing evidence that traditional research methods applied to drinking levels and certain disease outcomes have created illusory and misleading results. Heavy drinking is known to be linked to coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Traditional observational studies have, however, associated moderate drinking with the lowest risk and abstinence with a moderate risk (the U-curve or J-curve effect). In recent years, the U-curve has been increasingly attributed to confounding errors—when study results are distorted by other factors. In this case, the abstinence category is implicated since it establishes a false equivalence between study participants with widely differing risk factors (lifelong non-drinkers, those who stopped drinking for health or other alcohol-related problems, and those who falsely reported not drinking). Scientists have become able to control for these and other confounders using Mendelian randomization (MR), which draws on genetic data to explore disease risk. Most MR studies—largely limited to people of Asian and European origin—have found no link between moderate alcohol use and CHD or T2D, though some suggest a raised risk. For the study in Alcohol: Clinical & Experimental Research, investigators applied old and new analytical methods to a large, diverse data pool of US veterans.
Researchers worked with participants from the Million Veteran Program (MVP), which incorporates genetic information, alcohol exposure data, and electronic health records. The researchers identified more than 33,000 patients with CHD diagnoses, whom they matched to 165,000 controls without CHD, with a median age of 61% and 97% male. Seventy-four percent were European American, 18% African American, and 6% Hispanic American. There were more than 28,000 patients with T2D, matched to 141,000 controls without T2D, with a median age of 59, 93% male, and 65% European American, 25% African American, and 8% Hispanic American. They performed both observational and MR analyses exploring the relationship between alcohol consumption, CHD, and T2D. The models accounted for demographic factors, blood pressure, smoking, and other factors. For ancestry groups of sufficient size, genetic risk scores linked to alcohol use, blood pressure, and smoking were incorporated.
The observational analysis yielded the familiar U-shaped curve linking alcohol use with CHD and T2D among European and African Americans—but not among Hispanic Americans, a much smaller sample. The MR analysis of the full sample found no evidence of drinking level as a causal risk factor for CHD or T2D. This was the case when working with variants of ADH1B, a gene with well-established links to alcohol use, and when using genetic risk scores based on other relevant variants (for European Americans). Adjusting for the effects of blood pressure and smoking similarly showed no link between alcohol use and cardiometabolic disease risk.
This study provides persuasive additional evidence that moderate drinking is not protective against cardiometabolic disease and that the U-shaped curve is a product of confounding errors. It provides the most extensive exploration to date of the relationship between drinking level and CHD and T2D in African American and Hispanic American populations. Additional MR analysis is needed involving larger samples of non-European populations.
A Mendelian randomization study of alcohol use and cardiometabolic disease risk in a multi-ancestry population from the VA Million Veteran Program. R. Kember, C. Rentsch, J. Lynch, M. Vujkovic, B. Voight, A. Justice, T. L. Assimes, H. Kranzler. (https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15445)
An early-stage study has found that a drug commonly prescribed for diabetes may prove to help treat people with alcohol use disorder. The study, published in Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research, found that the diabetes drug metformin reduced alcohol intake in mice. While more research is needed to determine whether metformin can be effective in treating humans with alcohol use disorder, the findings suggest a potential for improved options for affordable, effective treatment through the repurposing of currently available medications.
Using mice selectively bred for reaching high blood alcohol levels, researchers conducted a number of experiments to examine the effects of metformin on acute and chronic binge-like levels of alcohol consumption.
Metformin was found to reduce both acute and chronic binge-like consumption of alcohol in the mice. In one experiment, the mice were given access to alcohol, water, and saccharin. The mice that received metformin prior to having access to the alcohol consumed less alcohol than those that did not receive the metformin. The metformin did not affect the mice's intake of the other fluids. Another experiment showed that reductions in alcohol intake were not due to increased clearance of ethanol from the bloodstream; metformin had no effect on how the body breaks down alcohol in the body.
Based on prior studies, the researchers had hypothesized that a particular enzyme was influenced by ethanol and metformin and responsible for the reductions in alcohol consumption. They examined the levels and activity of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, or AMPK, an enzyme that is sensitive to alcohol and is considered to be involved in neural processes, including learning, memory, and motivation. However, metformin and ethanol appeared to have no effect on AMPK in this study.
The experiments showed no differences in effects between male and female mice, but prior studies have shown sex differences in effects, and human females have higher rates of adverse reactions to metformin. Given the small samples in this study, more rigorous research is needed to evaluate the effects and side effects on different populations. The study authors recommend additional research on dosing and the effects of metformin on the consequences of harmful drinking, such as cognitive impairments.
Alcohol use disorder costs the United States $250 billion and more than 175,000 lives each year. Metformin is an already FDA-approved drug that is shown to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective in Type 2 diabetes. It has also been shown to be protective against several neurological disorders. The researchers recommend further study on metformin as a treatment for alcohol use disorder, which could improve accessible, effective, and equitable treatment for people with alcohol use disorders. While they examined metformin as a standalone treatment, they also point to the potential to combine metformin with existing medications for alcohol use disorder to boost their effectiveness.
Effects of metformin on binge-like ethanol drinking and adenosine monophosphate kinase signaling in inbred High Drinking in the Dark - Line 1 mice. K. Grigsby, J. Palacios Aragon, A.E. Chan, S. Spencer, A. Ozburn. (https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15460)
Half of 18- to 25-year-olds believe that the average young adult drives or rides in a car at least once a month while the driver is under the influence of alcohol and cannabis. Yet, seventy percent believe that both driving and riding in a car while the driver is under the influence of both alcohol and cannabis is totally unacceptable, and three percent of young adults report driving under the simultaneous influence of alcohol and cannabis, according to a study just published in Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research. The findings indicate that perceptions of social norms may sway young adults’ behavior related to driving under the influence of alcohol and cannabis differently than they do for alcohol alone and may inform strategies to reduce driving under the influence of alcohol and cannabis.
The study analyzed data from a cohort of two thousand 18- to 25-year-olds in Washington State to understand the associations between perceived social norms and self-reported behaviors related to driving or riding in a car while the driver is under the influence of alcohol and cannabis.
The findings showed a statistically significant positive association between the perceived social acceptability of driving under the influence of both alcohol and cannabis, as well as of riding with a driver who is under the influence of both substances and the likelihood of engaging in that behavior oneself. Perceptions of how common it is for other people to ride in a car while the driver is under the influence of both cannabis and alcohol were positively associated with the likelihood of doing so oneself.
The researchers did not find a significant association between perceptions of how common it was for other young adults to drive under the influence of both cannabis and alcohol and the individual's likelihood to do so. This finding was unexpected, as prior studies on alcohol have found perceptions of alcohol use by peers to be linked to one's own alcohol use.
For the study, participants were asked whether, in the prior 30 days, they had driven within three hours of using alcohol or cannabis or ridden in a car with someone who had. Twelve percent said they drove after using cannabis, and 20 percent said they rode with someone who had used cannabis. With regard to alcohol, 12 percent said they drove under the influence, and 11 percent were passengers in a car with an alcohol-impaired driver.
The rates of driving after using both alcohol and cannabis were lower–three percent for driving while impaired and five percent for riding with an impaired driver. However, simultaneous use of cannabis and alcohol seems to create greater impairment than either substance individually, with an estimated ten percent higher risk of accidents compared to driving under the influence of alcohol alone. Previous studies have found that many people perceive driving after cannabis use to be safer than driving after alcohol use.
The study highlights the discrepancy between perceived social norms and behavior and supports the need for efforts to reduce driving while impaired by the simultaneous use of alcohol and cannabis.
Young adult DUI behavior and perceived norms of driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use. B. Hultgren, M. Delawalla, V. Szydlowski, K. Guttmannova, J. Cadigan, J. Kilmer, C. Lee, M. Larimer. (https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15459)
一项新的研究表明,在经常使用大麻的年轻人中,饮酒与男性对大麻的渴望增强和女性对大麻的渴望减少有关。这些发现可能阐明了促使这两种物质联合使用的机制,并可能为预防或解决由此产生的危害提供针对性别的方法。年轻人通常同时使用酒精和大麻(即共同使用),使用这两种物质的人比使用其中一种物质的人经历了更多的负面后果,包括酒精使用障碍治疗的结果更差。共同使用可能部分驱动“交叉物质诱导”的渴望,其中两种物质的重复共同使用促使其中一种成为另一种的触发因素。对酒精和大麻的影响的研究——以前仅限于实验室测试和远程监测——暗示了这些影响的性别差异。在《酒精:临床实验研究》的研究中,研究人员探索了日常生活中对跨物质的渴望,这是同类研究中的第一项。研究人员对63名经常使用大麻的年轻人(年龄在18-21岁之间,主要是白人)进行了研究。在两周的时间里,参与者每天多次报告他们的酒精使用和大麻渴望,这种方法被称为生态瞬间评估,产生了3400多份报告。通过统计分析,研究人员探索了饮酒是否与更强烈的大麻渴望有关。他们还研究了性别和饮酒量对这种影响的影响。总体而言,参与者每周使用大麻约6天,每周使用酒精约2天。共同使用的天数占27%,男性和女性报告的比例相似。在男性中,饮酒与更强烈的大麻渴望有关,这意味着酒精的使用增强了他们对大麻的渴望。然而,当女性喝酒时,她们对大麻的渴望有所减少(这种影响并不显著)。酒精的使用水平不影响男性对大麻的渴望,尽管较高的酒精消费量与女性对大麻的渴望更显着减少有关。这些发现可能反映了基于性别的共同使用动机的不同。年轻人经常出于社会原因和增强积极情绪而使用药物。在这些情况下,使用一种物质可能会放大对另一种物质的渴望,从而增强“快感”。相比之下,年轻女性比男性更有可能使用药物来应对负面情绪。对他们来说,一种物质可能足以满足这一功能,减少了对其他物质使用的需求。另外,年轻女性可能会有意识地寻求避免混合药物的负面后果,其中可能包括性侵犯。随着大麻法律变得更加宽松,酒精和大麻的同时使用可能会继续增加,年轻男子可能特别容易受到负面后果的影响,因为他们更容易对多种物质产生渴望。相比之下,年轻妇女可能更多地是在替代而不是补充的基础上使用药物。因此,限制吸食大麻可能会导致女性转而更多地使用酒精。这凸显了政策面临的一个挑战:减少一个群体风险的努力可能会在不经意间增加对另一个群体的伤害。这些发现可能不适用于其他人口统计数据或使用酒精和大麻频率较低的年轻人。需要对具有不同药物使用政策的不同人群和社区进行进一步研究。日常生活中的酒精使用和大麻渴望:年轻人之间的性别差异和关联。C. Davis, N.E. Ramer, L. Squeglia, K. Gex, A. McRae, S. McKee, W. Roberts, K.M. Gray, N.L. Baker, R. Tomko。(https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15461)Moderate一项新的研究表明,饮酒不会降低欧洲、非洲或西班牙裔退伍军人患心血管代谢疾病的风险。越来越多的证据表明,传统的研究方法应用于饮酒水平和某些疾病的后果,产生了虚幻和误导性的结果,这些发现进一步证明了这一点。大量饮酒与冠心病(CHD)和2型糖尿病(T2D)有关。然而,传统的观察性研究将适度饮酒与最低风险联系起来,而戒酒与中等风险联系起来(u型曲线或j型曲线效应)。近年来,u型曲线越来越多地归因于混杂误差——当研究结果被其他因素扭曲时。在这种情况下,戒酒类别是有牵连的,因为它在具有广泛不同风险因素的研究参与者(终身不饮酒者,因健康或其他酒精相关问题而停止饮酒的人,以及谎称不饮酒的人)之间建立了虚假的等同。科学家们已经能够使用孟德尔随机化(MR)来控制这些和其他混杂因素,孟德尔随机化利用遗传数据来探索疾病风险。 大多数磁共振研究——主要局限于亚洲和欧洲人——没有发现适度饮酒与冠心病或T2D之间的联系,尽管有些研究表明风险增加。对酒精的研究:临床&;实验研究,调查人员将新旧分析方法应用于美国退伍军人的大量不同数据池。研究人员与百万退伍军人计划(MVP)的参与者合作,该计划包含遗传信息、酒精暴露数据和电子健康记录。研究人员确定了33,000多名被诊断为冠心病的患者,并将其与165,000名没有冠心病的对照组进行了匹配,这些患者的中位年龄为61%,其中97%为男性。74%是欧洲裔美国人,18%是非洲裔美国人,6%是西班牙裔美国人。超过28,000例T2D患者,141,000例无T2D对照,中位年龄为59岁,93%为男性,65%为欧洲裔美国人,25%为非洲裔美国人,8%为西班牙裔美国人。他们进行了观察性和磁共振分析,探讨了饮酒、冠心病和糖尿病之间的关系。这些模型考虑了人口因素、血压、吸烟和其他因素。对于足够大的祖先群体,纳入了与饮酒、血压和吸烟相关的遗传风险评分。观察性分析在欧洲和非洲裔美国人中得出了熟悉的u型曲线,将饮酒与冠心病和T2D联系起来,但在西班牙裔美国人中没有,这是一个小得多的样本。对全部样本的核磁共振分析发现,没有证据表明饮酒水平是冠心病或糖尿病的因果风险因素。在研究ADH1B的变体时就是这种情况,ADH1B是一种与饮酒有明确联系的基因,在使用基于其他相关变体的遗传风险评分时(针对欧裔美国人)。对血压和吸烟的影响进行调整后,同样显示酒精使用与心脏代谢疾病风险之间没有联系。这项研究提供了有说服力的额外证据,证明适度饮酒对心脏代谢疾病没有保护作用,u形曲线是混杂误差的产物。该研究为非裔美国人和西班牙裔美国人的饮酒水平与冠心病和T2D之间的关系提供了迄今为止最广泛的探索。需要对非欧洲人群进行更大样本的核磁共振分析。一项来自VA百万退伍军人计划的多祖先人群中酒精使用和心脏代谢疾病风险的孟德尔随机研究R. Kember, C. Rentsch, J. Lynch, M. Vujkovic, B. Voight, A. Justice, T. L. Assimes, H. Kranzler。(https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15445)An早期研究发现,一种通常用于治疗糖尿病的药物可能有助于治疗酒精使用障碍患者。这项发表在《酒精:临床与实验研究》上的研究发现,治疗糖尿病的药物二甲双胍减少了小鼠的酒精摄入量。虽然需要更多的研究来确定二甲双胍是否能有效治疗人类酒精使用障碍,但研究结果表明,通过重新利用现有药物,有可能改善可负担得起的有效治疗方案。研究人员利用选择性饲养的高血液酒精水平小鼠,进行了一系列实验,以检验二甲双胍对急性和慢性酗酒水平的影响。研究发现,二甲双胍可以减少小鼠急性和慢性酗酒。在一项实验中,老鼠被给予酒精、水和糖精。在接触酒精之前接受二甲双胍治疗的小鼠比没有接受二甲双胍治疗的小鼠消耗的酒精少。二甲双胍对小鼠摄入其他液体没有影响。另一项实验表明,酒精摄入量的减少并不是因为血液中乙醇清除量的增加;二甲双胍对人体分解酒精的方式没有影响。基于先前的研究,研究人员假设一种特殊的酶受到乙醇和二甲双胍的影响,并负责减少酒精消费量。他们检测了腺苷单磷酸活化蛋白激酶(AMPK)的水平和活性,AMPK是一种对酒精敏感的酶,被认为与神经过程有关,包括学习、记忆和动机。然而,在这项研究中,二甲双胍和乙醇似乎对AMPK没有影响。实验显示雄性和雌性老鼠对二甲双胍的影响没有差异,但之前的研究显示了影响的性别差异,而且人类女性对二甲双胍的不良反应率更高。鉴于本研究的样本较小,需要更严格的研究来评估对不同人群的影响和副作用。 该研究的作者建议进一步研究二甲双胍的剂量和对有害饮酒后果的影响,如认知障碍。酒精使用障碍每年给美国造成2500亿美元的损失,超过17.5万人死亡。二甲双胍是一种已经获得fda批准的药物,被证明对2型糖尿病是安全、耐受性良好和有效的。它还被证明可以预防几种神经系统疾病。研究人员建议进一步研究二甲双胍作为酒精使用障碍的治疗方法,这可以改善对酒精使用障碍患者的可及性、有效性和公平性治疗。虽然他们将二甲双胍作为一种单独的治疗方法进行了研究,但他们也指出,将二甲双胍与现有的治疗酒精使用障碍的药物联合使用,可能会提高其疗效。二甲双胍对暗系1型近交系高饮酒症小鼠酗酒样酒精饮酒和腺苷单磷酸激酶信号传导的影响。K. Grigsby, J. Palacios Aragon, A.E. Chan, S. Spencer, A. Ozburn。(https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15460)Half) 18至25岁的年轻人认为,在酒精和大麻的影响下,年轻人平均每月至少开车或乘车一次。然而,根据刚刚发表在《酒精:临床与实验研究》上的一项研究,70%的人认为,司机在酒精和大麻的影响下开车和坐车是完全不可接受的。3%的年轻人报告说,他们在酒精和大麻的同时影响下开车。研究结果表明,对社会规范的认知可能会影响年轻人在酒精和大麻影响下的驾驶行为,而不是仅仅影响酒精,并可能为减少在酒精和大麻影响下驾驶的战略提供信息。该研究分析了来自华盛顿州的2000名18至25岁年轻人的数据,以了解感知到的社会规范和自我报告的行为之间的联系,这些行为与司机在酒精和大麻的影响下驾驶或乘车有关。调查结果显示,在感知到的在酒精和大麻的影响下驾驶的社会可接受性,以及与受这两种物质影响的司机一起乘车,与自己从事这种行为的可能性之间存在统计学上显著的正相关关系。当司机在大麻和酒精的双重影响下开车时,别人开车是很常见的,这种认知与自己这样做的可能性呈正相关。研究人员没有发现其他年轻人在大麻和酒精的影响下开车的普遍程度与个人这样做的可能性之间存在显著关联。这一发现出乎意料,因为之前的酒精研究发现,同龄人对酒精使用的看法与自己的酒精使用有关。在这项研究中,参与者被问及,在过去的30天里,他们是否在使用酒精或大麻的3小时内开车,或者与使用过酒精或大麻的人一起坐车。12%的人说他们在吸食大麻后开车,20%的人说他们和吸食大麻的人一起坐车。关于酒精,12%的人说他们在酒精影响下开车,11%的人与酒精受损的司机坐在一起。同时使用酒精和大麻的人开车的比例要低一些,在有障碍的情况下开车的比例为3%,和有障碍的司机一起开车的比例为5%。然而,同时使用大麻和酒精似乎比单独使用任何一种物质造成更大的损害,与仅在酒精影响下驾驶相比,估计事故风险高出10%。先前的研究发现,许多人认为吸食大麻后开车比饮酒后开车更安全。该研究强调了社会规范和行为之间的差异,并支持有必要努力减少同时使用酒精和大麻而受损的驾驶。青年酒后驾驶行为和同时使用酒精和大麻影响下的驾驶感知规范。B. Hultgren, M. Delawalla, V. Szydlowski, K. Guttmannova, J. Cadigan, J. Kilmer, C. Lee, M. Larimer。(https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15459)