Scaling up mental health service provision through multisectoral integration: A qualitative analysis of factors shaping delivery and uptake among South Sudanese refugees and healthcare workers in Uganda.

IF 2.6 Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895241288574
Jacqueline N Ndlovu, Soukaina Ouizzane, Marx R Leku, Kenneth K Okware, Hafsa Sentongo, Bathsheba Nyangwen, Nawaraj Upadhaya, Morten Skovdal, Jura L Augustinavicius, Wietse A Tol
{"title":"Scaling up mental health service provision through multisectoral integration: A qualitative analysis of factors shaping delivery and uptake among South Sudanese refugees and healthcare workers in Uganda.","authors":"Jacqueline N Ndlovu, Soukaina Ouizzane, Marx R Leku, Kenneth K Okware, Hafsa Sentongo, Bathsheba Nyangwen, Nawaraj Upadhaya, Morten Skovdal, Jura L Augustinavicius, Wietse A Tol","doi":"10.1177/26334895241288574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing need for mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions that can feasibly be provided to larger groups of people, particularly in humanitarian settings. However, scaling up mental health interventions is notoriously difficult. There are therefore growing calls for integrating mental health outside traditional health structures, both to increase reach and to address social determinants of mental health. The objective of this study is to explore barriers and facilitators of Self-Help Plus (SH+), an MHPSS innovation implemented through multisectoral integration. We explore delivery and uptake at the scale of SH+ and aim to understand intervention adaptation needs when integrating SH+ within other health and non-health sectors in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews in two phases: first for a needs and resource assessment, and second for a process evaluation. We conducted 50 in-depth interviews with BRAC Uganda and MoH partner staff, intervention facilitators, and target impact group members between July and December 2022. A thematic network analysis process was used to identify barriers and facilitators of SH+ delivery and uptake at scale in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five major factors that should be considered when scaling through multisectoral integration, namely: (1) adaptivity, (2) funding mechanisms, (3) social capital, (4) participation, and (5) sustainability. Within these factors, there were varying degrees to which a factor was a facilitator or barrier, depending on participants' perceptions of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that multisectoral integration of SH+ into sectors both inside and outside of health may be a viable means to scale SH+ and increase reach. However, funding, partnerships, co-creation, and adaptability need to be further explored to facilitate better and more sustainable integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"26334895241288574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241288574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a growing need for mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions that can feasibly be provided to larger groups of people, particularly in humanitarian settings. However, scaling up mental health interventions is notoriously difficult. There are therefore growing calls for integrating mental health outside traditional health structures, both to increase reach and to address social determinants of mental health. The objective of this study is to explore barriers and facilitators of Self-Help Plus (SH+), an MHPSS innovation implemented through multisectoral integration. We explore delivery and uptake at the scale of SH+ and aim to understand intervention adaptation needs when integrating SH+ within other health and non-health sectors in Uganda.

Method: We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews in two phases: first for a needs and resource assessment, and second for a process evaluation. We conducted 50 in-depth interviews with BRAC Uganda and MoH partner staff, intervention facilitators, and target impact group members between July and December 2022. A thematic network analysis process was used to identify barriers and facilitators of SH+ delivery and uptake at scale in Uganda.

Results: We identified five major factors that should be considered when scaling through multisectoral integration, namely: (1) adaptivity, (2) funding mechanisms, (3) social capital, (4) participation, and (5) sustainability. Within these factors, there were varying degrees to which a factor was a facilitator or barrier, depending on participants' perceptions of the intervention.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that multisectoral integration of SH+ into sectors both inside and outside of health may be a viable means to scale SH+ and increase reach. However, funding, partnerships, co-creation, and adaptability need to be further explored to facilitate better and more sustainable integration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过多部门整合扩大精神卫生服务的提供:对乌干达南苏丹难民和卫生保健工作者提供和接受的影响因素的定性分析。
背景:越来越需要能够切实向更多人群提供的心理健康和社会心理支持(MHPSS)干预措施,特别是在人道主义环境中。然而,扩大心理健康干预是出了名的困难。因此,越来越多的人呼吁将精神卫生纳入传统卫生结构之外,以扩大覆盖面并解决精神卫生的社会决定因素。本研究的目的是探讨自助+ (Self-Help Plus, SH+)的障碍和促进因素,这是一种通过多部门整合实施的MHPSS创新。我们在乌干达的其他卫生和非卫生部门整合SH+时,探索SH+规模的交付和吸收,旨在了解干预适应需求。方法:我们采用深度访谈的方法进行定性研究,分两个阶段进行:第一阶段进行需求和资源评估,第二阶段进行过程评估。在2022年7月至12月期间,我们对BRAC乌干达和卫生部合作伙伴工作人员、干预协调员和目标影响小组成员进行了50次深度访谈。专题网络分析过程用于确定乌干达大规模提供和吸收SH+的障碍和促进因素。结果:我们确定了通过多部门整合扩大规模时应考虑的五个主要因素,即:(1)适应性,(2)融资机制,(3)社会资本,(4)参与,(5)可持续性。在这些因素中,根据参与者对干预的看法,一个因素在不同程度上是促进因素还是障碍。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在卫生部门内外多部门整合健康+可能是扩大健康+规模和扩大覆盖范围的可行手段。然而,需要进一步探索资金、伙伴关系、共同创造和适应性,以促进更好和更可持续的一体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-Based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to Document Modifications to a Multilevel Deimplementation Strategy Aimed at Reducing Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Pain. Using Incentivization as a Strategy to Improve Implementation of a Motivational Interviewing Brief Intervention for Substance Use Disorders in HIV Settings: Results of a 26-Site Parallel Groups Cluster-Randomized Type-3 Hybrid Trial. Exploring Factors Across Levels Impacting Educators' Selection of Evidence-Based Practices for Autistic Students. Real-World Implementation and Impact of Digital CBT for Insomnia on Healthcare Utilization: A Propensity-Matched Controlled Study. Cascading Training Model to Promote Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Across South Africa: Rollout in an HIV Service Organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1