Rationale and approach to evaluating interventions for newborn care in low- and middle-income countries.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1159/000542754
Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Rahima Yasin, Jai K Das, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
{"title":"Rationale and approach to evaluating interventions for newborn care in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Rahima Yasin, Jai K Das, Zulfiqar A Bhutta","doi":"10.1159/000542754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The neonatal period is the most vulnerable time in a child's life, contributing to almost half of all deaths in children under 5 years. Many of these deaths are preventable and are mainly caused by preterm birth, birth asphyxia, or serious infections. Over the past decade, the evidence base for interventions to prevent and manage these causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has expanded significantly. This growth calls for a comprehensive and systematic approach to synthesizing the available evidence. This paper describes the methodological approach taken before and during the conduct of the systematic overviews and reviews included in this supplement. Methods Alongside consultation with a newborn technical advisory group, the overall evidence synthesis approach began with an extensive literature scoping exercise to establish a universe of interventions that were relevant to neonatal health and survival, and to identify the associated systematic reviews examining their effectiveness. Three main approaches were taken to synthesize the evidence based on the availability of prior evidence. New systematic reviews were conducted for topics lacking an existing comprehensive synthesis. Existing systematic reviews with search dates prior to 2020 were updated. High-quality, up-to-date systematic reviews were used without modification. In all cases, trial data from studies conducted in LMICs were sought and prioritized for analysis. Conclusion A comprehensive approach to summarizing the best available evidence for newborn intervention effectiveness is described.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The neonatal period is the most vulnerable time in a child's life, contributing to almost half of all deaths in children under 5 years. Many of these deaths are preventable and are mainly caused by preterm birth, birth asphyxia, or serious infections. Over the past decade, the evidence base for interventions to prevent and manage these causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has expanded significantly. This growth calls for a comprehensive and systematic approach to synthesizing the available evidence. This paper describes the methodological approach taken before and during the conduct of the systematic overviews and reviews included in this supplement. Methods Alongside consultation with a newborn technical advisory group, the overall evidence synthesis approach began with an extensive literature scoping exercise to establish a universe of interventions that were relevant to neonatal health and survival, and to identify the associated systematic reviews examining their effectiveness. Three main approaches were taken to synthesize the evidence based on the availability of prior evidence. New systematic reviews were conducted for topics lacking an existing comprehensive synthesis. Existing systematic reviews with search dates prior to 2020 were updated. High-quality, up-to-date systematic reviews were used without modification. In all cases, trial data from studies conducted in LMICs were sought and prioritized for analysis. Conclusion A comprehensive approach to summarizing the best available evidence for newborn intervention effectiveness is described.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估低收入和中等收入国家新生儿护理干预措施的基本原理和方法。
新生儿期是儿童一生中最脆弱的时期,几乎占5岁以下儿童死亡总数的一半。其中许多死亡是可以预防的,主要是由早产、出生窒息或严重感染造成的。在过去十年中,在低收入和中等收入国家预防和管理这些新生儿死亡和发病原因的干预措施的证据基础已显著扩大。这种增长要求采取全面和系统的方法来综合现有的证据。本文描述了在进行本增刊中包括的系统概述和审查之前和期间采取的方法学方法。方法:除了与新生儿技术咨询小组协商外,总体证据综合方法从广泛的文献范围研究开始,以建立与新生儿健康和生存相关的干预措施,并确定相关的系统评价,以检查其有效性。基于现有证据的可得性,采用了三种主要方法来综合证据。对缺乏现有全面综合的主题进行了新的系统评价。更新了检索日期在2020年之前的现有系统综述。高质量的、最新的系统评价没有被修改。在所有情况下,从中低收入国家进行的研究中寻找试验数据,并优先进行分析。结论:本文描述了一种综合的方法来总结新生儿干预有效性的最佳证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microstructural maturation of the splenium of corpus callosum and cognitive and motor outcome in very preterm infants. Use of Macrogol to accelerate feeding advancement in extremely preterm infants. Interventions to prevent and manage infections in pregnancy. Validation of a New Classification for Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants: Insights from a Large Japanese Cohort. Association of early nutrition with bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity and MRI lung characteristics in preterm infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1