Overcoming the streetlight effect: Qualitative examination of community experts’ perceptions of foundations of learning and development (FOLD) skills

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1111/nyas.15273
Marilyn N. Ahun, Dana C. McCoy, Terri J. Sabol, Yuri Kim, Whitney Warren, Joshua Jeong
{"title":"Overcoming the streetlight effect: Qualitative examination of community experts’ perceptions of foundations of learning and development (FOLD) skills","authors":"Marilyn N. Ahun, Dana C. McCoy, Terri J. Sabol, Yuri Kim, Whitney Warren, Joshua Jeong","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developmental science has a long history of studying skills that children need to thrive. However, there has been a primary focus on academic skills, with little attention to the breadth and diversity of other skills that young children need to thrive. Furthermore, little is known about the extent to which community experts involved in early childhood care and education (ECCE) value different early developmental skills. This qualitative study examined how community experts (parents, preschool educators, clinicians, and ECCE leaders) defined and conceptualized six foundations of learning and development (FOLD) skills of child development (curiosity, creativity, critical thinking, self‐regulation and executive function, perspective taking, and internal representations of self). We conducted 60 virtual in‐depth interviews with a socioeconomically, racially, and geographically diverse sample of parents (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 26), educators (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 17), clinicians (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 11), and ECCE leaders (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 6) living in rural and urban areas across the United States. Participants universally acknowledged the importance of FOLD skills as central to development and well‐being in the early childhood period, while also recognizing their interrelatedness with one another. Most participants highlighted self‐regulation and executive function as a core skill. Findings affirm the value of these FOLD skills and highlight the importance of including them as target outcomes of ECCE interventions.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developmental science has a long history of studying skills that children need to thrive. However, there has been a primary focus on academic skills, with little attention to the breadth and diversity of other skills that young children need to thrive. Furthermore, little is known about the extent to which community experts involved in early childhood care and education (ECCE) value different early developmental skills. This qualitative study examined how community experts (parents, preschool educators, clinicians, and ECCE leaders) defined and conceptualized six foundations of learning and development (FOLD) skills of child development (curiosity, creativity, critical thinking, self‐regulation and executive function, perspective taking, and internal representations of self). We conducted 60 virtual in‐depth interviews with a socioeconomically, racially, and geographically diverse sample of parents (n = 26), educators (n = 17), clinicians (n = 11), and ECCE leaders (n = 6) living in rural and urban areas across the United States. Participants universally acknowledged the importance of FOLD skills as central to development and well‐being in the early childhood period, while also recognizing their interrelatedness with one another. Most participants highlighted self‐regulation and executive function as a core skill. Findings affirm the value of these FOLD skills and highlight the importance of including them as target outcomes of ECCE interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展科学在研究儿童茁壮成长所需的技能方面有着悠久的历史。然而,人们主要关注的是学业技能,而很少关注幼儿茁壮成长所需的其他技能的广度和多样性。此外,参与幼儿保育和教育(ECCE)的社区专家对不同早期发展技能的重视程度也鲜为人知。这项定性研究考察了社区专家(家长、学前教育工作者、临床医生和幼儿保育和教育领导者)如何定义和概念化儿童发展的六种学习和发展基础(FOLD)技能(好奇心、创造力、批判性思维、自我调节和执行功能、透视能力和自我内部表征)。我们进行了 60 次虚拟深度访谈,访谈对象包括社会经济、种族和地域多元化的家长(26 人)、教育工作者(17 人)、临床医生(11 人)和幼儿保育和教育领导者(6 人),他们居住在美国的农村和城市地区。与会者普遍承认 FOLD 技能对幼儿期发展和幸福的重要性,同时也认识到它们之间的相互关联性。大多数参与者强调,自我调节和执行功能是一项核心技能。研究结果肯定了这些 FOLD 技能的价值,并强调了将其作为幼儿保育和教育干预措施的目标成果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
期刊最新文献
Researching gender and loneliness differently The helmeted hornbill casque is reinforced by a bundle of exceptionally thick, rod‐like trabeculae Audio-visual concert performances synchronize audience's heart rates Geometric series exists in nature: Evidence from sorted area sequences of floral parts and leaves The rhythm of horse gaits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1