More food, but less land and water for nature: Why agricultural productivity gains did not materialize

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural Water Management Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109229
Chris Seijger , Anton Urfels , Maria Christoforidou , Petra Hellegers , Gerlo Borghuis , Simon Langan , Gerardo van Halsema
{"title":"More food, but less land and water for nature: Why agricultural productivity gains did not materialize","authors":"Chris Seijger ,&nbsp;Anton Urfels ,&nbsp;Maria Christoforidou ,&nbsp;Petra Hellegers ,&nbsp;Gerlo Borghuis ,&nbsp;Simon Langan ,&nbsp;Gerardo van Halsema","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Realism about productivity gains in agriculture and water is critical to understand if the world can feed itself while protecting nature. We use government-reported data to review progress over 2000–2020 compared to projections for irrigated and rainfed agriculture and trade. Our results over the period 2000–2020 show that productivity gains largely did not materialize. Instead of consolidating cereal production and trade in favourable regions like North America, Europe and Russia, their arable land declined by 35 million hectares, while arable land expanded by 74 million hectares in Africa, Latin America and Eastern Asia. Likewise, water productivity gains did not materialize, as photosynthesis breakthroughs did not occur. Land productivity (yield) gains were projected to rise 21–61 %, making the observed increase in cereal yields of 31 % a slight one. This puts the world on the path of using steadily more land and water to produce food and feed, at the expense of nature. Solutions to veer off this path include reducing food demand (including dietary change), stabilising rainfed agriculture and broadening the crop genetic resources base.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"307 ","pages":"Article 109229"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424005651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Realism about productivity gains in agriculture and water is critical to understand if the world can feed itself while protecting nature. We use government-reported data to review progress over 2000–2020 compared to projections for irrigated and rainfed agriculture and trade. Our results over the period 2000–2020 show that productivity gains largely did not materialize. Instead of consolidating cereal production and trade in favourable regions like North America, Europe and Russia, their arable land declined by 35 million hectares, while arable land expanded by 74 million hectares in Africa, Latin America and Eastern Asia. Likewise, water productivity gains did not materialize, as photosynthesis breakthroughs did not occur. Land productivity (yield) gains were projected to rise 21–61 %, making the observed increase in cereal yields of 31 % a slight one. This puts the world on the path of using steadily more land and water to produce food and feed, at the expense of nature. Solutions to veer off this path include reducing food demand (including dietary change), stabilising rainfed agriculture and broadening the crop genetic resources base.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更多的食物,但更少的土地和水的自然:为什么农业生产力的提高没有实现
要了解世界能否在保护自然的同时养活自己,在农业和水资源方面提高生产力的现实主义是至关重要的。我们使用政府报告的数据来审查2000-2020年期间的进展,并将其与灌溉和雨养农业和贸易的预测进行比较。我们在2000年至2020年期间的结果表明,生产率的提高在很大程度上没有实现。北美、欧洲和俄罗斯等有利地区的谷物生产和贸易没有得到巩固,他们的耕地面积减少了3500万公顷,而非洲、拉丁美洲和东亚的耕地面积增加了7400万公顷。同样,由于光合作用的突破没有发生,水生产力的提高也没有实现。预计土地生产力(产量)将增加21-61 %,使观测到的谷物产量增加31 %显得微不足道。这将使世界走上一条以牺牲自然为代价,不断使用更多土地和水来生产粮食和饲料的道路。改变这条道路的解决方案包括减少粮食需求(包括改变饮食习惯)、稳定雨养农业和扩大作物遗传资源基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Remote sensing characterisation of cropping systems and their water use to assess irrigation management from field to canal command scale Comparing crop growth models across the contiguous USA with a focus on dry and warm spells Benchmarking farm-level cotton water productivity using on-farm irrigation measurements and remotely sensed yields Integrated soil moisture fusion for enhanced agricultural drought monitoring in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1