Antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of non-invasive clinical Haemophilus influenzae isolates in Germany 2019 and 2020.

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlae197
Thiemo Frank, Esther Wohlfarth, Heike Claus, Manuel Krone, Thiên-Trí Lâm, Michael Kresken
{"title":"Antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of non-invasive clinical <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> isolates in Germany 2019 and 2020.","authors":"Thiemo Frank, Esther Wohlfarth, Heike Claus, Manuel Krone, Thiên-Trí Lâm, Michael Kresken","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> (Hi) is known as a cause of invasive and non-invasive diseases. Especially ear, nose and throat (ENT) infections are common reasons for antibiotic prescriptions in outpatient settings in Germany. Therefore, antibiotic resistance surveillance is important to provide the basis of recommendations for the empirical usage of antibiotic agents.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide data on susceptibility rates of oral antibiotics for non-invasive clinical Hi isolates in Germany and to investigate molecular resistance patterns of β-lactams, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Isolates were collected from a sentinel network of diagnostic laboratories in a prospective multicentre prevalence study. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done with a commercial broth microdilution kit. MICs were interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines. Resistance gene sequencing and WGS were performed to analyze molecular antibiotic resistance patterns and genetic relationships between the isolates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 215 Hi isolates were collected from 23 laboratories across Germany. The highest resistance rates were found for amoxicillin (<i>n</i> = 30; 14%), cefuroxime (<i>n</i> = 40; 18.6%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) (<i>n</i> = 34; 15.8%). Resistance to amoxicillin was mainly due to <i>bla<sub>TEM-1</sub></i> (<i>n</i> = 29; 96.7%). PBP3 alterations were found in 39 of 40 cefuroxime-resistant isolates (97.5%). Two of the cefuroxime-resistant isolates harboured PBP3 mutation patterns that have not yet been associated with cefuroxime resistance; in one of them, a known <i>lpoA</i> mutation was found. One isolate showed no mutations in PBP3 or <i>lpoA.</i> All co-trimoxazole-resistant isolates (15.8%) showed known mutations in <i>folA</i> and its promoter region. Additionally, point mutations in <i>folP</i> were identified in a subset of these isolates. The most frequent sequence types (STs) were ST57 (<i>n</i> = 10) and ST103 (<i>n</i> = 10). Genetic cluster analysis identified six clusters, but no epidemiological link could be confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resistance to oral antibiotics in non-invasive clinical Hi isolates in Germany was generally low. Amoxicillin is estimated to cover 86% of infections involving non-invasive Hi and, therefore, is still effective for the first-line empirical treatment for ENT infections in Germany. Further surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility in non-invasive Hi isolates is important to ensure the data basis for guidelines of antibiotic usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 6","pages":"dlae197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Haemophilus influenzae (Hi) is known as a cause of invasive and non-invasive diseases. Especially ear, nose and throat (ENT) infections are common reasons for antibiotic prescriptions in outpatient settings in Germany. Therefore, antibiotic resistance surveillance is important to provide the basis of recommendations for the empirical usage of antibiotic agents.

Objectives: To provide data on susceptibility rates of oral antibiotics for non-invasive clinical Hi isolates in Germany and to investigate molecular resistance patterns of β-lactams, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

Methods: Isolates were collected from a sentinel network of diagnostic laboratories in a prospective multicentre prevalence study. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done with a commercial broth microdilution kit. MICs were interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines. Resistance gene sequencing and WGS were performed to analyze molecular antibiotic resistance patterns and genetic relationships between the isolates.

Results: In total, 215 Hi isolates were collected from 23 laboratories across Germany. The highest resistance rates were found for amoxicillin (n = 30; 14%), cefuroxime (n = 40; 18.6%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) (n = 34; 15.8%). Resistance to amoxicillin was mainly due to blaTEM-1 (n = 29; 96.7%). PBP3 alterations were found in 39 of 40 cefuroxime-resistant isolates (97.5%). Two of the cefuroxime-resistant isolates harboured PBP3 mutation patterns that have not yet been associated with cefuroxime resistance; in one of them, a known lpoA mutation was found. One isolate showed no mutations in PBP3 or lpoA. All co-trimoxazole-resistant isolates (15.8%) showed known mutations in folA and its promoter region. Additionally, point mutations in folP were identified in a subset of these isolates. The most frequent sequence types (STs) were ST57 (n = 10) and ST103 (n = 10). Genetic cluster analysis identified six clusters, but no epidemiological link could be confirmed.

Conclusion: Resistance to oral antibiotics in non-invasive clinical Hi isolates in Germany was generally low. Amoxicillin is estimated to cover 86% of infections involving non-invasive Hi and, therefore, is still effective for the first-line empirical treatment for ENT infections in Germany. Further surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility in non-invasive Hi isolates is important to ensure the data basis for guidelines of antibiotic usage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年和2020年德国非侵袭性临床流感嗜血杆菌分离株的抗生素耐药性和分子特征
背景:流感嗜血杆菌(Hi)被认为是侵袭性和非侵袭性疾病的病因。特别是耳鼻喉(ENT)感染是德国门诊抗生素处方的常见原因。因此,抗生素耐药性监测对于为抗生素的经验性使用提供建议依据具有重要意义。目的:提供德国临床非侵袭性Hi分离株口服抗生素的药敏率数据,探讨β-内酰胺类、环丙沙星、多西环素和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑的分子耐药模式。方法:在前瞻性多中心流行病学研究中,从诊断实验室的哨点网络收集分离物。药敏试验采用商业肉汤微量稀释试剂盒。mic按照EUCAST指南进行解释。采用耐药基因测序和WGS分析菌株的分子耐药模式和遗传关系。结果:在德国23个实验室共采集到215株Hi分离株。阿莫西林耐药率最高(n = 30;14%),头孢呋辛(n = 40;18.6%)和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(复方新恶唑)(n = 34;15.8%)。对阿莫西林耐药主要是由于blaem -1 (n = 29;96.7%)。40株头孢呋辛耐药菌株中有39株(97.5%)出现PBP3改变。两株头孢呋辛耐药菌株携带的PBP3突变模式尚未与头孢呋辛耐药相关;在其中一人身上发现了已知的lpoA突变。一株分离物未显示PBP3或lpoA突变。所有耐药菌株(15.8%)均在folA及其启动子区出现已知突变。此外,在这些分离株的一个子集中发现了folP的点突变。最常见的序列类型是ST57 (n = 10)和ST103 (n = 10)。遗传聚类分析确定了6个聚类,但没有证实流行病学联系。结论:德国临床非侵袭性Hi分离株对口服抗生素的耐药性普遍较低。据估计,阿莫西林覆盖了86%的非侵入性Hi感染,因此,在德国,阿莫西林仍然是耳鼻喉科感染的一线经验治疗有效。进一步监测非侵入性Hi分离株的抗菌药物敏感性对于确保抗生素使用指南的数据基础至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive analysis of antimicrobial resistance of clinical emm89 Streptococcus pyogenes in Japan. Antibiotic resistance in the Middle East and Southern Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Insights into MLSB resistance in invasive group A streptococci in West Virginia, USA. Plasma concentration of azithromycin and correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with enteric fever. Assessing the impact of using a patient counselling prompt-the TARGET antibiotic checklist in England's community pharmacies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1