Amit K Mahajan, Nancy Collar, Frances Muldowney, Paul Gorka, Duy K Duong, Priya P Patel, Joseph Cicenia, Douglas K Hogarth, Steven Nathan
{"title":"Echocardiography Findings for Pulmonary Hypertension During Workup for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.","authors":"Amit K Mahajan, Nancy Collar, Frances Muldowney, Paul Gorka, Duy K Duong, Priya P Patel, Joseph Cicenia, Douglas K Hogarth, Steven Nathan","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a minimally invasive intervention that improves dyspnea and quality of life in select individuals with emphysema. Echocardiography is the initial screening tool for pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients evaluated for BLVR. Multiple BLVR and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) trials have used and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) of 45 mm Hg as a cutoff for potential significant PH. However, PH is established hemodynamically by right heart catheterization (RHC), not echocardiography due to notoriously inaccurate RSVP values in patients with lung disease, especially those with COPD and suboptimal acoustic imaging windows. Over a 5-year period, all patients who met PFT criteria for BLVR underwent a routine screening echocardiogram for PH. Twenty-four patients with a RVSP >45 mm Hg or suspicion of significant PH on echocardiography were subjected to RHC. Twenty-one (88%) with suspicion for significant PH based on echocardiography did not have significant PH on RHC. Three patients (12%) had significant PH based on RHC precluding them from BLVR. Ten of the 21 patients with echo suspected PH, but RHC negative PH qualified for BLVR. Twelve-month follow-up data was available for 7 of these patients post-BLVR that included change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The mean change in FEV1 showed an increase of 0.154 L, 6MWD increase of 42 m, and SGRQ decrease of 11.5 points. On the basis of results from this study, all patients being evaluated for BLVR found to have a RVSP over 45 mm Hg on echocardiography should undergo RHC to confirm significant PH.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a minimally invasive intervention that improves dyspnea and quality of life in select individuals with emphysema. Echocardiography is the initial screening tool for pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients evaluated for BLVR. Multiple BLVR and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) trials have used and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) of 45 mm Hg as a cutoff for potential significant PH. However, PH is established hemodynamically by right heart catheterization (RHC), not echocardiography due to notoriously inaccurate RSVP values in patients with lung disease, especially those with COPD and suboptimal acoustic imaging windows. Over a 5-year period, all patients who met PFT criteria for BLVR underwent a routine screening echocardiogram for PH. Twenty-four patients with a RVSP >45 mm Hg or suspicion of significant PH on echocardiography were subjected to RHC. Twenty-one (88%) with suspicion for significant PH based on echocardiography did not have significant PH on RHC. Three patients (12%) had significant PH based on RHC precluding them from BLVR. Ten of the 21 patients with echo suspected PH, but RHC negative PH qualified for BLVR. Twelve-month follow-up data was available for 7 of these patients post-BLVR that included change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The mean change in FEV1 showed an increase of 0.154 L, 6MWD increase of 42 m, and SGRQ decrease of 11.5 points. On the basis of results from this study, all patients being evaluated for BLVR found to have a RVSP over 45 mm Hg on echocardiography should undergo RHC to confirm significant PH.
支气管镜下肺减容术(BLVR)是一种微创干预,可改善肺气肿患者的呼吸困难和生活质量。超声心动图是BLVR患者肺动脉高压(PH)的初步筛查工具。多次BLVR和肺减容积手术(LVRS)试验使用45毫米汞柱的右心室收缩压(RVSP)作为潜在显著PH的截止值。然而,PH是通过右心导管(RHC)而不是超声心动图来确定的,因为众所周知,肺病患者的RSVP值不准确,特别是那些患有COPD和次优声学成像窗口的患者。在5年的时间里,所有符合PFT标准的BLVR患者都进行了常规的PH超声心动图筛查。24例RVSP >45 mm Hg或超声心动图上怀疑有明显PH的患者进行了RHC检查。21例(88%)超声心动图怀疑有明显的PH值,但RHC没有明显的PH值。3例(12%)患者有基于RHC的显著PH,排除BLVR。21例患者中有10例回声怀疑PH,但RHC阴性PH符合BLVR。其中7例患者在blvr后12个月的随访数据包括1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)的变化。FEV1的平均变化增加了0.154 L, 6MWD增加了42 m, SGRQ下降了11.5点。根据本研究的结果,所有在超声心动图上发现RVSP超过45 mm Hg的BLVR评估患者都应进行RHC以确认明显的PH。