Structured pre-delivery huddles enhance confidence in managing newborns with critical congenital heart disease in the delivery room.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1038/s41372-024-02196-8
Alyssa R Thomas, Caitlin Bowen, Elisa Abdulhayoglu, Elizabeth Brennick, Kendra Woo, Margaret F Everett, Eleonore Valencia, Kristen T Leeman, Simon M Manning, Elisabeth Kaza
{"title":"Structured pre-delivery huddles enhance confidence in managing newborns with critical congenital heart disease in the delivery room.","authors":"Alyssa R Thomas, Caitlin Bowen, Elisa Abdulhayoglu, Elizabeth Brennick, Kendra Woo, Margaret F Everett, Eleonore Valencia, Kristen T Leeman, Simon M Manning, Elisabeth Kaza","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02196-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborns with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) require specialized delivery room management, but varying experience and knowledge can reduce confidence and impact care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-delivery, structured huddle checklist was introduced, addressing team roles, expected physiology, and management plans. PDSA cycles incorporated guidelines and simulation-based education to improve confidence in specialized resuscitation strategies. Surveys were conducted at baseline and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline, all-respondent confidence in managing \"all types of CCHD\" was somewhat confident (median 3/5; IQR 2-4) increasing to moderately confident (4/5; IQR 2-4) at 6 months (p = 0.59). Respondents with 0-3 years' experience showed increased confidence over 6 months in identifying unstable infants (from baseline 24% to 67% moderately/very confident, p = 0.005), prostaglandin E1 needs (from 24% to 62%, p = 0.013) and sedation requirements (from 5% to 33%, p = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structured huddles improved confidence among less experienced team members, emphasizing the importance of shared mental models before CCHD deliveries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02196-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Newborns with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) require specialized delivery room management, but varying experience and knowledge can reduce confidence and impact care.

Methods: A pre-delivery, structured huddle checklist was introduced, addressing team roles, expected physiology, and management plans. PDSA cycles incorporated guidelines and simulation-based education to improve confidence in specialized resuscitation strategies. Surveys were conducted at baseline and 6 months.

Results: Baseline, all-respondent confidence in managing "all types of CCHD" was somewhat confident (median 3/5; IQR 2-4) increasing to moderately confident (4/5; IQR 2-4) at 6 months (p = 0.59). Respondents with 0-3 years' experience showed increased confidence over 6 months in identifying unstable infants (from baseline 24% to 67% moderately/very confident, p = 0.005), prostaglandin E1 needs (from 24% to 62%, p = 0.013) and sedation requirements (from 5% to 33%, p = 0.045).

Conclusion: Structured huddles improved confidence among less experienced team members, emphasizing the importance of shared mental models before CCHD deliveries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构化的产前会议提高了在产房管理新生儿重症先天性心脏病的信心。
背景:新生儿重症先天性心脏病(CCHD)需要专门的产房管理,但不同的经验和知识会降低信心和影响护理。方法:引入了一份交付前、结构化的会议清单,列出了团队角色、预期生理和管理计划。PDSA循环纳入指南和基于模拟的教育,以提高对专业复苏策略的信心。在基线和6个月时进行调查。结果:基线,所有被调查者对管理“所有类型CCHD”的信心都有一定的信心(中位数为3/5;IQR 2-4)增加到中等自信(4/5;6个月时IQR为2-4)(p = 0.59)。具有0-3年经验的受访者在6个月内对识别不稳定婴儿(从基线24%到67%中度/非常自信,p = 0.005),前列腺素E1需求(从24%到62%,p = 0.013)和镇静需求(从5%到33%,p = 0.045)的信心增加。结论:结构化的会议提高了经验不足的团队成员的信心,强调了在CCHD分娩前共享心理模型的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Is it time for a separate residency and department in "Neonatal Critical Care Medicine"? The impact of standardization of care for neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation. Early exclusive enteral feeding in 30-33 weeks gestation infants: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology fellow assessment and evaluation: embracing the word salad of CBME, EPAs, and milestones. Changes in the treatment and outcomes of different severities of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in California: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1