Enoxaparin 40mg Twice Daily with Peak Anti-Xa Adjustments is Safe and Necessary to Achieve Therapeutic Chemoprophylaxis in Burn-Injured Patients.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae201
Desiree N Pinto, Sophia Lee, Cory Johnson, Rola Halabi, Tuan D Le, Lauren T Moffatt, Bonnie C Carney, Shane K Mathew, Melissa McLawhorn, Shawn Tejiram, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W Shupp
{"title":"Enoxaparin 40mg Twice Daily with Peak Anti-Xa Adjustments is Safe and Necessary to Achieve Therapeutic Chemoprophylaxis in Burn-Injured Patients.","authors":"Desiree N Pinto, Sophia Lee, Cory Johnson, Rola Halabi, Tuan D Le, Lauren T Moffatt, Bonnie C Carney, Shane K Mathew, Melissa McLawhorn, Shawn Tejiram, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W Shupp","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn injury results in hypercoagulability and an increased venous thromboembolism risk. However, the most effective chemoprophylaxis for burn-injured patients has yet to be elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to identify the safety and efficacy of a burn center's venous thromboembolism protocol modification which increased the dose of enoxaparin from 40mg daily to 40mg twice daily with peak anti-Xa level adjustments. It was hypothesized that this change would not increase bleeding complications and would decrease venous thromboembolism rates. All adult, burn-injured patients admitted to a regional burn center were retrospectively reviewed one year before and after the implementation of this protocol modification. There were no differences in demographics, injury characteristics, or hospital length of stay between the pre- (n=432) and post-protocol modification (n=407) groups. Bleeding complications did not increase in the post-protocol group, including intraoperative blood loss (50 vs 25cc), the total number of transfusions (9.0 vs 6.0 units), and GI bleeding events (0.7 vs 0.2%) (all p>0.05). Most patients receiving enoxaparin 40mg twice daily achieved an initial therapeutic level based on peak anti-Xa measurements (46.5%), yet the rate of venous thromboembolisms between pre- and post-protocol groups was not statistically different (1.4 vs 0.7%, p=0.5072). Factors associated with an initial sub- or supratherapeutic peak anti-Xa level were percent total body surface area, weight, body mass index, and creatinine clearance. Overall, this study demonstrated that a higher dose of enoxaparin (40mg twice daily) with peak anti-Xa level adjustments was safe in burn-injured patients and necessary to obtain therapeutic levels of chemoprophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burn injury results in hypercoagulability and an increased venous thromboembolism risk. However, the most effective chemoprophylaxis for burn-injured patients has yet to be elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to identify the safety and efficacy of a burn center's venous thromboembolism protocol modification which increased the dose of enoxaparin from 40mg daily to 40mg twice daily with peak anti-Xa level adjustments. It was hypothesized that this change would not increase bleeding complications and would decrease venous thromboembolism rates. All adult, burn-injured patients admitted to a regional burn center were retrospectively reviewed one year before and after the implementation of this protocol modification. There were no differences in demographics, injury characteristics, or hospital length of stay between the pre- (n=432) and post-protocol modification (n=407) groups. Bleeding complications did not increase in the post-protocol group, including intraoperative blood loss (50 vs 25cc), the total number of transfusions (9.0 vs 6.0 units), and GI bleeding events (0.7 vs 0.2%) (all p>0.05). Most patients receiving enoxaparin 40mg twice daily achieved an initial therapeutic level based on peak anti-Xa measurements (46.5%), yet the rate of venous thromboembolisms between pre- and post-protocol groups was not statistically different (1.4 vs 0.7%, p=0.5072). Factors associated with an initial sub- or supratherapeutic peak anti-Xa level were percent total body surface area, weight, body mass index, and creatinine clearance. Overall, this study demonstrated that a higher dose of enoxaparin (40mg twice daily) with peak anti-Xa level adjustments was safe in burn-injured patients and necessary to obtain therapeutic levels of chemoprophylaxis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
依诺肝素40mg,每日2次,抗xa调节峰是安全的,是实现烧伤患者化疗预防治疗的必要条件。
烧伤导致高凝性和静脉血栓栓塞风险增加。然而,最有效的化学预防烧伤患者尚未阐明。因此,本研究旨在确定烧伤中心静脉血栓栓塞方案修改的安全性和有效性,该方案将依诺肝素的剂量从每天40mg增加到40mg,每天2次,并调整抗xa水平峰值。假设这种改变不会增加出血并发症,并会降低静脉血栓栓塞率。所有在区域烧伤中心住院的成人烧伤患者在实施本方案修改前后一年进行回顾性分析。方案修改前组(n=432)和方案修改后组(n=407)在人口统计学、损伤特征或住院时间方面没有差异。方案后组的出血并发症没有增加,包括术中出血量(50 vs 25cc)、总输血次数(9.0 vs 6.0单位)和胃肠道出血事件(0.7 vs 0.2%)(均p < 0.05)。大多数接受依诺肝素40mg每日两次的患者达到了基于峰值抗xa测量的初始治疗水平(46.5%),但方案前组和方案后组之间的静脉血栓栓塞率无统计学差异(1.4 vs 0.7%, p=0.5072)。与初始亚治疗或超治疗峰值抗xa水平相关的因素是总体表面积百分比、体重、体重指数和肌酐清除率。总的来说,本研究表明,高剂量的依诺肝素(40mg,每日两次)和峰值抗xa水平调整对烧伤患者是安全的,并且是获得治疗水平的化学预防所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Burn center versus burn unit, which is better? Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and its Use in Burn Wounds: An Updated Systematic Review. Burn Progression in Human Skin - A Review of Current Knowledge and Opportunities for Future Research. Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review. Wildland Firefighters Suffer Increasing Risk of Job-Related Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1