Amol Mehta, Preethi Reddi, S Javin Bose, Joshua Finesilver, Daryl Goldman, Paramjit Sembhi, Reade Andrew De Leacy, Johanna T Fifi, J Mocco, Benjamin Yim, Shahram Majidi
{"title":"Lower Ticagrelor Dosing in the Dual Antiplatelet Regimen for Neurointerventional Procedures.","authors":"Amol Mehta, Preethi Reddi, S Javin Bose, Joshua Finesilver, Daryl Goldman, Paramjit Sembhi, Reade Andrew De Leacy, Johanna T Fifi, J Mocco, Benjamin Yim, Shahram Majidi","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ticagrelor, a P2Y12 inhibitor, offers a rapid onset and consistent platelet inhibition, making it a viable alternative for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The optimal ticagrelor dose for neurointerventional procedures, however, remains unclear. We report our experience with ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily plus aspirin 81 mg daily compared with the standard aspirin and clopidogrel regimen for intracranial stenting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, identifying consecutive patients who underwent intracranial stenting for aneurysm treatment or intracranial atherosclerosis. Patients received either ticagrelor 60 mg with aspirin or aspirin with clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Primary outcomes included peri-procedural ischemic and/or hemorrhagic events within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the median P2Y12 reaction unit and in-stent stenosis rates at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 119 patients, 59 received ticagrelor and 60 (50.4%) received clopidogrel. Baseline characteristics including age and gender were comparable between the two groups, although the ticagrelor group had a higher proportion of African-American patients. The majority of patients underwent aneurysm treatment (n=105; 88.23%), while the remainder received stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis (n=14; 11.77%). No ischemic events occurred in either group and intracranial hemorrhage rates were comparable (1.7% in both groups). The median P2Y12 reaction unit was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group (69 vs 126, P<0.001). In-stent stenosis rates were lower with ticagrelor (5% vs 21%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ticagrelor 60 mg for DAPT in intracranial stenting is safe and effective. Larger prospective studies may be required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022536","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ticagrelor, a P2Y12 inhibitor, offers a rapid onset and consistent platelet inhibition, making it a viable alternative for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The optimal ticagrelor dose for neurointerventional procedures, however, remains unclear. We report our experience with ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily plus aspirin 81 mg daily compared with the standard aspirin and clopidogrel regimen for intracranial stenting.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, identifying consecutive patients who underwent intracranial stenting for aneurysm treatment or intracranial atherosclerosis. Patients received either ticagrelor 60 mg with aspirin or aspirin with clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Primary outcomes included peri-procedural ischemic and/or hemorrhagic events within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the median P2Y12 reaction unit and in-stent stenosis rates at 6-month follow-up.
Results: Among 119 patients, 59 received ticagrelor and 60 (50.4%) received clopidogrel. Baseline characteristics including age and gender were comparable between the two groups, although the ticagrelor group had a higher proportion of African-American patients. The majority of patients underwent aneurysm treatment (n=105; 88.23%), while the remainder received stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis (n=14; 11.77%). No ischemic events occurred in either group and intracranial hemorrhage rates were comparable (1.7% in both groups). The median P2Y12 reaction unit was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group (69 vs 126, P<0.001). In-stent stenosis rates were lower with ticagrelor (5% vs 21%).
Conclusion: Ticagrelor 60 mg for DAPT in intracranial stenting is safe and effective. Larger prospective studies may be required to validate these findings.
背景:替格瑞洛是一种P2Y12抑制剂,具有快速起效和持续的血小板抑制作用,使其成为双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的可行替代方案。然而,替格瑞洛用于神经介入治疗的最佳剂量仍不清楚。我们报告了与标准阿司匹林和氯吡格雷方案相比,替格瑞洛60mg每日2次加阿司匹林81mg每日进行颅内支架置入的经验。方法:我们对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,确定连续接受颅内支架治疗动脉瘤或颅内动脉粥样硬化的患者。患者每日服用替格瑞洛60毫克与阿司匹林或阿司匹林与氯吡格雷75毫克。主要结局包括30天内术中缺血和/或出血事件。次要结局是6个月随访时P2Y12反应单位中位数和支架内狭窄率。结果:119例患者中,替格瑞洛59例,氯吡格雷60例(50.4%)。基线特征包括年龄和性别在两组之间具有可比性,尽管替格瑞洛组有更高比例的非裔美国患者。大多数患者接受了动脉瘤治疗(n=105;88.23%),其余接受颅内动脉粥样硬化支架置入术(n=14;11.77%)。两组均未发生缺血事件,颅内出血率相当(两组均为1.7%)。替格瑞洛组中位P2Y12反应单位显著降低(69 vs 126)。结论:替格瑞洛60mg用于DAPT颅内支架置入术是安全有效的。可能需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.