Allogeneic stem cell transplantation against aggressive lymphomas: graft-versus-lymphoma effects in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after myeloablative conditioning.
Evgenii Shumilov, Lena Levien, Paolo Mazzeo, Wolfram Jung, Andreas Leha, Raphael Koch, Justin Hasenkamp, Gerald Wulf
{"title":"Allogeneic stem cell transplantation against aggressive lymphomas: graft-versus-lymphoma effects in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after myeloablative conditioning.","authors":"Evgenii Shumilov, Lena Levien, Paolo Mazzeo, Wolfram Jung, Andreas Leha, Raphael Koch, Justin Hasenkamp, Gerald Wulf","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2024.2438805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) represents a curative option for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive lymphomas. We compared outcomes of alloSCT in r/r PTCL and r/r DLBCL pts (<i>n</i> = 150) who underwent identical myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy, GvHD prophylaxis, and relapse management. 5-year PFS and OS were significantly superior in PTCL compared to DLBCL (56% vs. 24%; 56% vs. 28%; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.005). A landmark analysis (day≥ +100 post-alloSCT) markedly favored outcomes in PTCL vs. DLBCL: 5-year PFS and OS of 76% vs. 30% and 76% and 35%, respectively (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.003). Non-relapse mortality was comparable (35% PTCL vs. 34% DLBCL, <i>p</i> = 0.894), whereas post-alloSCT relapse mortality was significantly higher in DLBCL (36% vs. 10%, <i>p</i> = 0.0007). The occurence of limited chronic GvHD did not improve outcomes in DLBCL, whereas extensive chronic GvHD was a negative risk factor for both (HR 2.09 and 2.80, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.006). In conclusion, we gained evidence for strong graft-versus-lymphoma activity against PTCL but not DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2438805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) represents a curative option for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive lymphomas. We compared outcomes of alloSCT in r/r PTCL and r/r DLBCL pts (n = 150) who underwent identical myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy, GvHD prophylaxis, and relapse management. 5-year PFS and OS were significantly superior in PTCL compared to DLBCL (56% vs. 24%; 56% vs. 28%; p ≤ 0.005). A landmark analysis (day≥ +100 post-alloSCT) markedly favored outcomes in PTCL vs. DLBCL: 5-year PFS and OS of 76% vs. 30% and 76% and 35%, respectively (p ≤ 0.003). Non-relapse mortality was comparable (35% PTCL vs. 34% DLBCL, p = 0.894), whereas post-alloSCT relapse mortality was significantly higher in DLBCL (36% vs. 10%, p = 0.0007). The occurence of limited chronic GvHD did not improve outcomes in DLBCL, whereas extensive chronic GvHD was a negative risk factor for both (HR 2.09 and 2.80, p ≤ 0.006). In conclusion, we gained evidence for strong graft-versus-lymphoma activity against PTCL but not DLBCL.
同种异体干细胞移植(alloSCT)是复发/难治性(r/r)侵袭性淋巴瘤患者的治疗选择。我们比较了接受相同的清骨髓调节化疗、GvHD预防和复发管理的r/r PTCL和r/r DLBCL患者(n = 150)的同种异体细胞移植的结果。PTCL的5年PFS和OS明显优于DLBCL (56% vs. 24%;56% vs. 28%;p≤0.005)。具有里程碑意义的分析(移植后≥+100天)明显有利于PTCL与DLBCL的预后:5年PFS和OS分别为76%、30%、76%和35% (p≤0.003)。非复发死亡率相当(PTCL 35% vs DLBCL 34%, p = 0.894),而DLBCL移植后的复发死亡率明显更高(36% vs 10%, p = 0.0007)。有限慢性GvHD的发生并没有改善DLBCL的预后,而广泛慢性GvHD是两者的负风险因素(HR 2.09和2.80,p≤0.006)。总之,我们获得的证据表明,移植物抗淋巴瘤对PTCL有很强的活性,而对DLBCL没有。
期刊介绍:
Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor