Allogeneic stem cell transplantation against aggressive lymphomas: graft-versus-lymphoma effects in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after myeloablative conditioning.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Leukemia & Lymphoma Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1080/10428194.2024.2438805
Evgenii Shumilov, Lena Levien, Paolo Mazzeo, Wolfram Jung, Andreas Leha, Raphael Koch, Justin Hasenkamp, Gerald Wulf
{"title":"Allogeneic stem cell transplantation against aggressive lymphomas: graft-versus-lymphoma effects in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after myeloablative conditioning.","authors":"Evgenii Shumilov, Lena Levien, Paolo Mazzeo, Wolfram Jung, Andreas Leha, Raphael Koch, Justin Hasenkamp, Gerald Wulf","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2024.2438805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) represents a curative option for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive lymphomas. We compared outcomes of alloSCT in r/r PTCL and r/r DLBCL pts (<i>n</i> = 150) who underwent identical myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy, GvHD prophylaxis, and relapse management. 5-year PFS and OS were significantly superior in PTCL compared to DLBCL (56% vs. 24%; 56% vs. 28%; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.005). A landmark analysis (day≥ +100 post-alloSCT) markedly favored outcomes in PTCL vs. DLBCL: 5-year PFS and OS of 76% vs. 30% and 76% and 35%, respectively (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.003). Non-relapse mortality was comparable (35% PTCL vs. 34% DLBCL, <i>p</i> = 0.894), whereas post-alloSCT relapse mortality was significantly higher in DLBCL (36% vs. 10%, <i>p</i> = 0.0007). The occurence of limited chronic GvHD did not improve outcomes in DLBCL, whereas extensive chronic GvHD was a negative risk factor for both (HR 2.09 and 2.80, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.006). In conclusion, we gained evidence for strong graft-versus-lymphoma activity against PTCL but not DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2438805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) represents a curative option for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive lymphomas. We compared outcomes of alloSCT in r/r PTCL and r/r DLBCL pts (n = 150) who underwent identical myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy, GvHD prophylaxis, and relapse management. 5-year PFS and OS were significantly superior in PTCL compared to DLBCL (56% vs. 24%; 56% vs. 28%; p ≤ 0.005). A landmark analysis (day≥ +100 post-alloSCT) markedly favored outcomes in PTCL vs. DLBCL: 5-year PFS and OS of 76% vs. 30% and 76% and 35%, respectively (p ≤ 0.003). Non-relapse mortality was comparable (35% PTCL vs. 34% DLBCL, p = 0.894), whereas post-alloSCT relapse mortality was significantly higher in DLBCL (36% vs. 10%, p = 0.0007). The occurence of limited chronic GvHD did not improve outcomes in DLBCL, whereas extensive chronic GvHD was a negative risk factor for both (HR 2.09 and 2.80, p ≤ 0.006). In conclusion, we gained evidence for strong graft-versus-lymphoma activity against PTCL but not DLBCL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同种异体干细胞移植治疗侵袭性淋巴瘤:骨髓清除后外周血t细胞淋巴瘤和弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的移植物抗淋巴瘤作用
同种异体干细胞移植(alloSCT)是复发/难治性(r/r)侵袭性淋巴瘤患者的治疗选择。我们比较了接受相同的清骨髓调节化疗、GvHD预防和复发管理的r/r PTCL和r/r DLBCL患者(n = 150)的同种异体细胞移植的结果。PTCL的5年PFS和OS明显优于DLBCL (56% vs. 24%;56% vs. 28%;p≤0.005)。具有里程碑意义的分析(移植后≥+100天)明显有利于PTCL与DLBCL的预后:5年PFS和OS分别为76%、30%、76%和35% (p≤0.003)。非复发死亡率相当(PTCL 35% vs DLBCL 34%, p = 0.894),而DLBCL移植后的复发死亡率明显更高(36% vs 10%, p = 0.0007)。有限慢性GvHD的发生并没有改善DLBCL的预后,而广泛慢性GvHD是两者的负风险因素(HR 2.09和2.80,p≤0.006)。总之,我们获得的证据表明,移植物抗淋巴瘤对PTCL有很强的活性,而对DLBCL没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Dose-adjusted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with acute leukemia: experience of a tertiary cancer care center. Early impact of treatment modifications adopted for acute lymphoblastic leukemia during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic; a single center experience and lessons for LMICs. MicroRΝΑ analysis in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms. Possible implications in risk stratification. Blinatumomab use in patients with CD19 positive B-ALL and hepatic dysfunction. Complete remission in a case of acute undifferentiated leukemia with novel combination therapy of FLAG-IDA and venetoclax.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1