A survey study on the availability of anaesthetic breathing systems and their use in dogs weighing 5–10 kg

IF 1.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.vaa.2024.10.136
Andrew G. Murray, Kerry Woodhouse, Pamela J. Murison
{"title":"A survey study on the availability of anaesthetic breathing systems and their use in dogs weighing 5–10 kg","authors":"Andrew G. Murray,&nbsp;Kerry Woodhouse,&nbsp;Pamela J. Murison","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.10.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate which breathing systems are available and why they are selected in dogs weighing 5–10 kg.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Anonymous online voluntary open survey.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey, designed following CHERRIES guidelines, was advertised through the American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists - List, Association of Veterinary Anaesthesia and European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia (February–March 2022). A convenience sample was taken.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 256 responses received, 138 were completed. This included (<em>n</em> responses received) veterinarians (107) and veterinary nurses or technicians (29) actively involved in the anaesthesia of dogs.</div><div>The most prevalent breathing systems available to respondents were circle (99%), coaxial Bain (79%) and modified Ayre’s T-piece (with adjustable pressure limiting valve) (72%). When recommending a dog weight range suitable for the use with these systems, respondents advised a median (interquartile range) from 5 (3–10) to 100 (100–100), 3 (0–8) to 20 (10–33) and 0 (0–0) to 10 (7–10) kg, respectively. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that important factors in selecting a breathing system were the fresh gas flow requirement (92%), dog weight (91%), resistance (83%) and environmental pollution (79%). In clinical scenarios based on 5–10 kg dogs, the circle system was chosen by 58% for a thin and 77% for a keel-chested <em>versus</em> 44% for an obese and 66% for a barrel-chested dog, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><div>The circle system is the most commonly available breathing system. The minimum weight limit used for the circle system is less than that reported by previous surveys. Several factors influence the choice of breathing system other than dog weight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":"52 1","pages":"Pages 35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146729872400326X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate which breathing systems are available and why they are selected in dogs weighing 5–10 kg.

Study design

Anonymous online voluntary open survey.

Methods

An online survey, designed following CHERRIES guidelines, was advertised through the American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists - List, Association of Veterinary Anaesthesia and European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia (February–March 2022). A convenience sample was taken.

Results

Of the 256 responses received, 138 were completed. This included (n responses received) veterinarians (107) and veterinary nurses or technicians (29) actively involved in the anaesthesia of dogs.
The most prevalent breathing systems available to respondents were circle (99%), coaxial Bain (79%) and modified Ayre’s T-piece (with adjustable pressure limiting valve) (72%). When recommending a dog weight range suitable for the use with these systems, respondents advised a median (interquartile range) from 5 (3–10) to 100 (100–100), 3 (0–8) to 20 (10–33) and 0 (0–0) to 10 (7–10) kg, respectively. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that important factors in selecting a breathing system were the fresh gas flow requirement (92%), dog weight (91%), resistance (83%) and environmental pollution (79%). In clinical scenarios based on 5–10 kg dogs, the circle system was chosen by 58% for a thin and 77% for a keel-chested versus 44% for an obese and 66% for a barrel-chested dog, respectively.

Conclusions and clinical relevance

The circle system is the most commonly available breathing system. The minimum weight limit used for the circle system is less than that reported by previous surveys. Several factors influence the choice of breathing system other than dog weight.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于麻醉呼吸系统的可用性及其在体重5-10公斤的狗身上使用的调查研究。
目的:研究体重5-10公斤的狗有哪些呼吸系统可用,以及为什么选择它们。研究设计:匿名在线自愿公开调查。方法:根据樱桃指南设计的在线调查,通过美国兽医麻醉师学院-名单,兽医麻醉协会和欧洲兽医麻醉与镇痛学院(2022年2月至3月)进行广告宣传。取了方便样本。结果:收到的256份回复中,完成了138份。这包括(收到的n份回复)兽医(107)和兽医护士或技术人员(29)积极参与狗的麻醉。受访者最常用的呼吸系统是圆形呼吸系统(99%)、同轴贝恩呼吸系统(79%)和改良Ayre's t型呼吸系统(带可调限压阀)(72%)。在推荐适合使用这些系统的狗体重范围时,受访者建议的中位数(四分位数范围)分别为5(3-10)至100(100-100),3(0-8)至20(10-33)和0(0-0)至10(7-10)公斤。受访者同意或强烈同意选择呼吸系统的重要因素是新鲜气体流量要求(92%),狗体重(91%),阻力(83%)和环境污染(79%)。在基于5-10公斤狗的临床场景中,58%的瘦狗和77%的龙骨胸狗选择了圆形系统,44%的肥胖狗和66%的桶胸狗分别选择了圆形系统。结论及临床意义:循环呼吸系统是最常用的呼吸系统。圆形系统使用的最小重量限制比以前调查报告的要小。除了狗的体重,还有几个因素会影响呼吸系统的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome: the basic sciences; pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management equipment intensive care chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals welfare issues associated with pain and distress education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.
期刊最新文献
Fluoroscopy-assisted endobronchial intubation in a cat undergoing thoracoscopy. Pharmacokinetics of combinations of dexmedetomidine, vatinoxan and ketamine in male neutered cats. Retrospective evaluation of the effect of xylazine infusion on survival to discharge in horses undergoing exploratory laparotomy for colic. Evaluation of an indirect NaV1.7 inhibitor as adjunctive analgesic in burn-related neuropathic pain in a cat. General anesthesia for dental extractions in a dog with hyperadrenocorticism and myotonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1