Adverse events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 11.2 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Medicine Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102029
Felicia Ceban, Naomi Abayomi, Aparna Saripella, Jennita Ariaratnam, Glen Katsnelson, Ellene Yan, Marina Englesakis, Tong J Gan, Girish P Joshi, Frances Chung
{"title":"Adverse events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Felicia Ceban, Naomi Abayomi, Aparna Saripella, Jennita Ariaratnam, Glen Katsnelson, Ellene Yan, Marina Englesakis, Tong J Gan, Girish P Joshi, Frances Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be at increased risk for adverse events during procedural sedation, however, there remains a gap in the literature quantifying these risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of peri-procedural adverse events in OSA patients undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings, compared to those without OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2011 to January 4, 2024. The inclusion criteria were: adult patients with OSA undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings, peri-procedural adverse events reported, and control group included. The primary outcome was the incidence of peri-procedural adverse events amongst patients with vs without OSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies (27,973 patients) were included. The odds of respiratory adverse events were significantly increased for patients with OSA (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.03-2.66, P = 0.04). Furthermore, the odds of requiring an airway maneuver/intervention were significantly greater for patients with OSA (OR 3.28, 95 % CI 1.43-7.51, P = 0.005). The odds of cardiovascular adverse events were not significantly increased for patients with OSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with OSA undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings had 1.7-fold greater odds of respiratory adverse events and 3.3-fold greater odds of requiring airway maneuvers/interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49513,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","volume":"80 ","pages":"102029"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be at increased risk for adverse events during procedural sedation, however, there remains a gap in the literature quantifying these risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of peri-procedural adverse events in OSA patients undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings, compared to those without OSA.

Methods: Four databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2011 to January 4, 2024. The inclusion criteria were: adult patients with OSA undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings, peri-procedural adverse events reported, and control group included. The primary outcome was the incidence of peri-procedural adverse events amongst patients with vs without OSA.

Results: Nineteen studies (27,973 patients) were included. The odds of respiratory adverse events were significantly increased for patients with OSA (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.03-2.66, P = 0.04). Furthermore, the odds of requiring an airway maneuver/intervention were significantly greater for patients with OSA (OR 3.28, 95 % CI 1.43-7.51, P = 0.005). The odds of cardiovascular adverse events were not significantly increased for patients with OSA.

Conclusion: Patients with OSA undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings had 1.7-fold greater odds of respiratory adverse events and 3.3-fold greater odds of requiring airway maneuvers/interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Sleep Medicine Reviews 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine Reviews offers global coverage of sleep disorders, exploring their origins, diagnosis, treatment, and implications for related conditions at both individual and public health levels. Articles comprehensively review clinical information from peer-reviewed journals across various disciplines in sleep medicine, encompassing pulmonology, psychiatry, psychology, physiology, otolaryngology, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiology, dentistry, nursing, neurology, and general medicine. The journal features narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and editorials addressing areas of controversy, debate, and future research within the field.
期刊最新文献
A meta-analytic investigation of the effect of sleep deprivation on inhibitory control. Prevalence of depression in pediatric patients with diagnosed or at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Adverse events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Editorial Board What you believe is what you get? A systematic review examining how beliefs and attitudes about sleep are associated with sleep duration in non-clinical samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1