Single and Dual Task Gait Speed in Frailty Screening of Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

IF 2.5 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Primary Care and Community Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21501319241306700
Joey Yeo, Laura Tay, Yong Hao Pua, Shi Min Mah, Ee Ling Tay, Min Xian Wang, Yee Sien Ng
{"title":"Single and Dual Task Gait Speed in Frailty Screening of Community-Dwelling Older Adults.","authors":"Joey Yeo, Laura Tay, Yong Hao Pua, Shi Min Mah, Ee Ling Tay, Min Xian Wang, Yee Sien Ng","doi":"10.1177/21501319241306700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compares dual task (DT) gait speed between robust and frail older adults in the setting of a community-based frailty screening program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted involving older adults aged 50 years or older. Participants were categorized as robust, pre-frail or frail using the FRAIL phenotype. Gait speed was measured under single task (ST) and 2 DT conditions: arithmetic (DT1) and verbal fluency (DT2) tasks. For the arithmetic task, participants counted upwards in multiples of 2, starting from 16. For the verbal fluency task, they named different animals as they walked.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 976 participants were recruited, of which 779 were robust, 181 were pre-frail and 16 were frail. Robust participants exhibited significantly faster DT gait speeds (DT1: 1.12 (0.25)m/s; DT2: 0.97 (0.27)m/s than pre-frail/frail (PFF) participants (DT1: 0.88 (0.30)m/s); DT2: 0.78 (0.30)m/s). Robust participants also demonstrated a significantly faster ST gait speed (1.31 (0.22)m/s) vs 1.05 (0.31)m/s).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DT gait assessment combines both physical and cognitive domains and may serve as a more holistic tool for early frailty detection in the community. The significant differences observed in DT gait speeds highlight the need for integrating cognitive assessments into frailty screening protocols, supporting timely interventions to improve health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"21501319241306700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241306700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compares dual task (DT) gait speed between robust and frail older adults in the setting of a community-based frailty screening program.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving older adults aged 50 years or older. Participants were categorized as robust, pre-frail or frail using the FRAIL phenotype. Gait speed was measured under single task (ST) and 2 DT conditions: arithmetic (DT1) and verbal fluency (DT2) tasks. For the arithmetic task, participants counted upwards in multiples of 2, starting from 16. For the verbal fluency task, they named different animals as they walked.

Results: A total of 976 participants were recruited, of which 779 were robust, 181 were pre-frail and 16 were frail. Robust participants exhibited significantly faster DT gait speeds (DT1: 1.12 (0.25)m/s; DT2: 0.97 (0.27)m/s than pre-frail/frail (PFF) participants (DT1: 0.88 (0.30)m/s); DT2: 0.78 (0.30)m/s). Robust participants also demonstrated a significantly faster ST gait speed (1.31 (0.22)m/s) vs 1.05 (0.31)m/s).

Conclusion: DT gait assessment combines both physical and cognitive domains and may serve as a more holistic tool for early frailty detection in the community. The significant differences observed in DT gait speeds highlight the need for integrating cognitive assessments into frailty screening protocols, supporting timely interventions to improve health outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单任务和双任务步态速度在社区居住老年人衰弱筛查中的作用。
目的:本研究比较了基于社区的衰弱筛查项目中健壮和虚弱老年人的双任务(DT)步态速度。方法:对50岁以上的老年人进行横断面研究。参与者被分类为健壮,虚弱或虚弱使用虚弱表型。在单任务(ST)和2 DT条件下测量步态速度:算术(DT1)和语言流畅(DT2)任务。对于算术任务,参与者从16开始,以2的倍数向上数。在语言流畅性测试中,他们一边走路一边给不同的动物命名。结果:共招募了976名参与者,其中779名健全人,181名体弱,16名体弱。稳健的参与者表现出明显更快的DT步态速度(DT1: 1.12 (0.25)m/s;DT1: 0.97 (0.27)m/s比虚弱前/虚弱(PFF)参与者(DT1: 0.88 (0.30)m/s);DT2: 0.78 (0.30)m/s)。稳健的参与者也表现出明显更快的ST步速(1.31 (0.22)m/s) vs 1.05 (0.31)m/s)。结论:DT步态评估结合了身体和认知领域,可以作为社区早期虚弱检测的更全面的工具。观察到的DT步态速度的显著差异突出了将认知评估纳入虚弱筛查方案的必要性,支持及时干预以改善健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Merging Law and Medicine: Patient Attitudes About and Experiences with Social Needs Screening and Medical-Legal Partnerships in Primary Care. Understanding Experiences of First Contact Physiotherapy in General Practice: A Realist Qualitative Study. The Effects of a Health Literacy Promotion Program on Health Behaviors and Blood Pressure Levels Among Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Dynamics of Lifestyle Counseling for Chronic Diseases Within and Between General Practices and Social Work Services Causal Loop Diagram and Points for Improvement. "The resources are there, it's just not sufficient:" Primary Care Team Members and Their Experiences with Connecting Patients to Needed Resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1