Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Pediatric Healthcare-A Rapid Evidence Assessment.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241290481
C Bartholdson, E Broström, M D Iversen, J Granhagen Jungner
{"title":"Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Pediatric Healthcare-A Rapid Evidence Assessment.","authors":"C Bartholdson, E Broström, M D Iversen, J Granhagen Jungner","doi":"10.1177/23743735241290481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to describe what is known in the scientific literature about patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in pediatric healthcare and identify areas for further exploration. PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, COCHRANE, and SveMed+ combined with free text search in FireFox and Safari web browsers using Medical Subject Headings terms were used. Outcomes of interest were patient experience and measures of these constructs. Of the 316 studies identified, 68 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-eight studies (72%) were published between 2015 and 2020 and more than half (53%) were published in Europe. Most studies of PREMs in pediatric healthcare included adult proxies as participants. Seventy-eight percent of studies consisted of > 100 participants. Thirty-six studies (53%) were quantitative studies, 26 (38%) were evaluative studies of patient experience measures, and 6 (9%) were qualitative in design. Three hundred eleven domains were identified and further categorized into 14 domain areas. This research is important because it aims to amplify the voices of children in healthcare and establish a foundation for developing validated pediatric-PREMs that is grounded in children's firsthand experiences of care, rather than relying primarily on proxy accounts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241290481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241290481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to describe what is known in the scientific literature about patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in pediatric healthcare and identify areas for further exploration. PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, COCHRANE, and SveMed+ combined with free text search in FireFox and Safari web browsers using Medical Subject Headings terms were used. Outcomes of interest were patient experience and measures of these constructs. Of the 316 studies identified, 68 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-eight studies (72%) were published between 2015 and 2020 and more than half (53%) were published in Europe. Most studies of PREMs in pediatric healthcare included adult proxies as participants. Seventy-eight percent of studies consisted of > 100 participants. Thirty-six studies (53%) were quantitative studies, 26 (38%) were evaluative studies of patient experience measures, and 6 (9%) were qualitative in design. Three hundred eleven domains were identified and further categorized into 14 domain areas. This research is important because it aims to amplify the voices of children in healthcare and establish a foundation for developing validated pediatric-PREMs that is grounded in children's firsthand experiences of care, rather than relying primarily on proxy accounts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童医疗保健中患者报告经验措施——快速证据评估
本研究的目的是描述什么是已知的科学文献中关于儿童医疗保健的病人报告的经验措施(PREMs),并确定进一步探索的领域。PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、b谷歌Scholar、COCHRANE和SveMed+结合使用医学主题标题在FireFox和Safari网络浏览器中进行免费文本搜索。感兴趣的结果是患者体验和这些构念的测量。在确定的316项研究中,有68项符合纳入标准。2015年至2020年间发表了48项研究(72%),其中一半以上(53%)发表在欧洲。大多数儿科医疗保健的PREMs研究包括成人代理作为参与者。78%的研究由100名参与者组成。36项研究(53%)为定量研究,26项研究(38%)为患者体验措施的评价性研究,6项研究(9%)为定性设计。确定了311个域,并将其进一步划分为14个域。这项研究很重要,因为它旨在扩大儿童在医疗保健中的声音,并为开发基于儿童第一手护理经验的有效儿科prems奠定基础,而不是主要依赖代理账户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gendered Experiences of Intravenous Iron Infusion Reactions: A Patient Perspective. Addressing the Underrepresentation of African American Mental Health Professionals: A Call to Action. Enhancing Patient Choice Through the Development of Physical Therapist Online Biographies. Engaging Patients with Headache in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): ACTIvated Veterans Engagement Group (ACTIVE) to Improve Delivery of Patient-Centered Headache Services. Impact of Standardized Reporting Systems on Patient Experience in Radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1