A New Diagnostic Approach for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Using a Combination of Scores Based on Flow Cytometry and Automated Hematology Sysmex XN Analyzers

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY International Journal of Laboratory Hematology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1111/ijlh.14404
Ludovic Firrera, Benjamin Podvin, Julien Herlem, Marion Magierowicz, Alexandre Willaume, Vincent Thibaud, Agnès Charpentier
{"title":"A New Diagnostic Approach for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Using a Combination of Scores Based on Flow Cytometry and Automated Hematology Sysmex XN Analyzers","authors":"Ludovic Firrera,&nbsp;Benjamin Podvin,&nbsp;Julien Herlem,&nbsp;Marion Magierowicz,&nbsp;Alexandre Willaume,&nbsp;Vincent Thibaud,&nbsp;Agnès Charpentier","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The first-step in diagnosis of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) is essentially based on bone marrow cytomorphology. However, cytomorphology of MDS is often a difficult exercise, subject to inter-operator variability. Our study aims to evaluate whether the combination of two dysplasia scores, the extended Ogata score and the MDS-CBC score, could improve the screening of MDS patients among patients with chronic cytopenia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Extended Ogata score and MDS-CBC score have been measured on a retrospective cohort of 63 patients with a clinical suspicion of MDS based on the presence of cytopenia. Among these patients, 33 patients were diagnosed as MDS (MDS group) and 30 patients were diagnosed with another cause of cytopenia (non-MDS cytopenic control group).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our results show excellent performance of the combined scores in predicting MDS when the two scores are concordant: positive predictive value (PPV) = 96% and negative predictive value (NPV) = 92%. In comparison, in the same cohort, extended Ogata score alone showed a PPV = 90% and NPV = 79%, MDS-CBC score alone showed a PPV = 85% and NPV = 86%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>For the first time, our results show that the combination of these two dysplasia scores constitutes a useful and rapid tool for the assessment of dysplasia associated with MDS. In the MDS diagnostic process, the use of combined scores could constitute a valuable tool to enable early strong prediction of MDS in cytopenic patients and to target patients who initially require additional genetic assays.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"47 2","pages":"236-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijlh.14404","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The first-step in diagnosis of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) is essentially based on bone marrow cytomorphology. However, cytomorphology of MDS is often a difficult exercise, subject to inter-operator variability. Our study aims to evaluate whether the combination of two dysplasia scores, the extended Ogata score and the MDS-CBC score, could improve the screening of MDS patients among patients with chronic cytopenia.

Methods

Extended Ogata score and MDS-CBC score have been measured on a retrospective cohort of 63 patients with a clinical suspicion of MDS based on the presence of cytopenia. Among these patients, 33 patients were diagnosed as MDS (MDS group) and 30 patients were diagnosed with another cause of cytopenia (non-MDS cytopenic control group).

Results

Our results show excellent performance of the combined scores in predicting MDS when the two scores are concordant: positive predictive value (PPV) = 96% and negative predictive value (NPV) = 92%. In comparison, in the same cohort, extended Ogata score alone showed a PPV = 90% and NPV = 79%, MDS-CBC score alone showed a PPV = 85% and NPV = 86%.

Conclusion

For the first time, our results show that the combination of these two dysplasia scores constitutes a useful and rapid tool for the assessment of dysplasia associated with MDS. In the MDS diagnostic process, the use of combined scores could constitute a valuable tool to enable early strong prediction of MDS in cytopenic patients and to target patients who initially require additional genetic assays.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于流式细胞术和自动血液学Sysmex XN分析仪的评分组合诊断骨髓增生异常肿瘤的新方法。
骨髓增生异常肿瘤(MDS)诊断的第一步基本上是基于骨髓细胞形态学。然而,MDS的细胞形态学通常是一个困难的练习,受制于操作者之间的可变性。我们的研究旨在评估扩展Ogata评分和MDS- cbc评分两种异常增生评分的结合是否可以改善慢性细胞减少患者中MDS患者的筛查。方法:对63例因存在细胞减少而临床怀疑为MDS的患者进行回顾性队列测量扩展绪方评分和MDS- cbc评分。其中33例诊断为MDS (MDS组),30例诊断为其他原因的细胞减少(非MDS细胞减少对照组)。结果:我们的研究结果显示,当两个评分一致时,联合评分对MDS的预测效果很好:阳性预测值(PPV) = 96%,阴性预测值(NPV) = 92%。相比之下,在同一队列中,单独扩展Ogata评分显示PPV = 90%, NPV = 79%,单独MDS-CBC评分显示PPV = 85%, NPV = 86%。结论:我们的研究结果首次表明,这两种异常增生评分的结合是评估MDS相关异常增生的有效且快速的工具。在MDS诊断过程中,使用联合评分可以成为一种有价值的工具,能够在细胞减少患者中对MDS进行早期强预测,并针对最初需要额外基因检测的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information A Rare ZMYND8::PDGFRβ Fusion Transcript in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Molecular Characterization of δβ Thalassemia/Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin and Its Correlation With Clinical and Hematological Profile; a Single Center Study in North India Zopiclone Overdose Is an Important and Under-Recognized Cause of Drug-Induced Oxidative Hemolysis: A Case Series Identified by Heinz Body Test Request
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1