Gait recovery in patients with late assessment of incomplete spinal cord injury: A retrospective study in Argentina.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2434304
Marcelo A Gatti, Yamila Dieni, Lucia Yaccuzzi, María E Rivas, Daniela G L Terson de Paleville
{"title":"Gait recovery in patients with late assessment of incomplete spinal cord injury: A retrospective study in Argentina.","authors":"Marcelo A Gatti, Yamila Dieni, Lucia Yaccuzzi, María E Rivas, Daniela G L Terson de Paleville","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2434304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective data analysis study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess gait recovery rates in subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) at the start of rehabilitation and to report their gait performance.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary inpatient Rehabilitation Center in Argentina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed data from 143 individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (AIS/ASIA Impairment Scale C and D) within 90 days of injury, all non-ambulatory upon admission. Gait status at discharge was evaluated using the 6-minute walk test and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II). Statistical evaluations utilized Pearson chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Approval was obtained from Fleni's Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 65 patients with AIS C, 69% regained walking function, compared to 87% of the 74 patients with AIS D (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Walkers had a mean total motor score of 67 (±19) versus 51.7 (±25.5) for non-walkers (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and a total pinprick sensation score of 69.8 (± 27.5) vs. 49.5 (± 29) (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Additionally, 54% of AIS C and 86% of AIS D patients aged ≥ 50 regained walking ability; however, age-related differences were statistically significant only in AIS C group (<i>p</i> = 0,015). AIS D patients walked a mean of 249 meters (±134), while AIS C walked 207 meters (±128) (<i>p</i> = 0.07). The median WISCI II score between the two groups were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with incomplete motor SCI who participated in inpatient rehabilitation regained walking, with motor score and pinprick sensation correlating to walking ability. Gait performance was comparable between AIS C and D.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2434304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective data analysis study.

Objectives: To assess gait recovery rates in subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) at the start of rehabilitation and to report their gait performance.

Setting: Tertiary inpatient Rehabilitation Center in Argentina.

Methods: The study analyzed data from 143 individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (AIS/ASIA Impairment Scale C and D) within 90 days of injury, all non-ambulatory upon admission. Gait status at discharge was evaluated using the 6-minute walk test and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II). Statistical evaluations utilized Pearson chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Approval was obtained from Fleni's Ethics Committee.

Results: Among the 65 patients with AIS C, 69% regained walking function, compared to 87% of the 74 patients with AIS D (p = 0.01). Walkers had a mean total motor score of 67 (±19) versus 51.7 (±25.5) for non-walkers (p = 0.002), and a total pinprick sensation score of 69.8 (± 27.5) vs. 49.5 (± 29) (p = 0.001). Additionally, 54% of AIS C and 86% of AIS D patients aged ≥ 50 regained walking ability; however, age-related differences were statistically significant only in AIS C group (p = 0,015). AIS D patients walked a mean of 249 meters (±134), while AIS C walked 207 meters (±128) (p = 0.07). The median WISCI II score between the two groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Most patients with incomplete motor SCI who participated in inpatient rehabilitation regained walking, with motor score and pinprick sensation correlating to walking ability. Gait performance was comparable between AIS C and D.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation of the German language version of the QUAlity of life assessment of spina bifida for adults (QUALAS-A-G). Gait recovery in patients with late assessment of incomplete spinal cord injury: A retrospective study in Argentina. Heavy moxibustion at Sanyin point ameliorates neurogenic bladder dysfunction in spinal cord injury rats through the PI3 K/mTOR pathway. Osteoporosis and osteopenia in young adults with spinal cord injury: The necessity of an early bone mineral density checkup. Evolution of the Veterans Health Administration Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders (SCI/D) Registry (VHA SCIDR): Characterization from 1994 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1