Efficacy of Collagen Matrix for Establishing Keratinized Mucosa at Dental Implants: A 5-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.

Diyuan Wei, Qi Wang, Huiping Sui, Yixuan Qin, Han Zhang, Huanxin Meng, Jie Han
{"title":"Efficacy of Collagen Matrix for Establishing Keratinized Mucosa at Dental Implants: A 5-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Diyuan Wei, Qi Wang, Huiping Sui, Yixuan Qin, Han Zhang, Huanxin Meng, Jie Han","doi":"10.1111/cid.13422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the 5-year outcomes of collagen matrix (CM) and free gingival graft (FGG) used to augment the keratinized mucosa (KM) around posterior dental implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients (44 implants) with inadequate KM (< 2 mm) on posterior dental implants were randomized into two groups that received KM augmentation with CM or FGG. Clinical measurements comprising the KM width (KMW), buccal mucosal thickness (MT), and clinical parameters were examined in a 5-year follow-up. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was evaluated with standardized radiographs using the paralleling technique. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during the first week post-surgery and at the 5-year follow-up were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>KMW increased significantly during the follow-up period in both groups. The FGG group had a significantly greater KMW than the CM group at the 1, 2-month follow-up and after the 6-month follow-up. KM shrinkage was observed, and was greatest within the first 2 months post-surgery in both groups. At the 5-year follow-up, the KM shrinkage was significantly different between the groups (FGG: 47%; CM: 70%) (p < 0.01). The MT increased significantly in the FGG group. The clinical parameters and MBL were similar between the groups. The bleeding score in the FGG group was higher than that in the CM group (p < 0.05) within the first 2 days post-surgery, while other PROs scores were similar between groups in the first week post-surgery. At 5-year follow-up, all patients were highly satisfied with the treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FGG was superior to CM in terms of the KM augmentation and MT increase. Except for a slight difference in self-reported bleeding during the first two post-operative days, CM didn't demonstrate other significant advantages in PROMs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR1800018285 (date of registration: 9/9/2018, retrospectively registered. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=24156).</p>","PeriodicalId":93944,"journal":{"name":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the 5-year outcomes of collagen matrix (CM) and free gingival graft (FGG) used to augment the keratinized mucosa (KM) around posterior dental implants.

Materials and methods: Thirty patients (44 implants) with inadequate KM (< 2 mm) on posterior dental implants were randomized into two groups that received KM augmentation with CM or FGG. Clinical measurements comprising the KM width (KMW), buccal mucosal thickness (MT), and clinical parameters were examined in a 5-year follow-up. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was evaluated with standardized radiographs using the paralleling technique. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during the first week post-surgery and at the 5-year follow-up were evaluated.

Results: KMW increased significantly during the follow-up period in both groups. The FGG group had a significantly greater KMW than the CM group at the 1, 2-month follow-up and after the 6-month follow-up. KM shrinkage was observed, and was greatest within the first 2 months post-surgery in both groups. At the 5-year follow-up, the KM shrinkage was significantly different between the groups (FGG: 47%; CM: 70%) (p < 0.01). The MT increased significantly in the FGG group. The clinical parameters and MBL were similar between the groups. The bleeding score in the FGG group was higher than that in the CM group (p < 0.05) within the first 2 days post-surgery, while other PROs scores were similar between groups in the first week post-surgery. At 5-year follow-up, all patients were highly satisfied with the treatments.

Conclusions: FGG was superior to CM in terms of the KM augmentation and MT increase. Except for a slight difference in self-reported bleeding during the first two post-operative days, CM didn't demonstrate other significant advantages in PROMs.

Trial registration: ChiCTR1800018285 (date of registration: 9/9/2018, retrospectively registered. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=24156).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胶原基质在牙种植体中建立角化粘膜的疗效:一项5年随机对照试验。
目的:比较胶原基质(CM)和游离牙龈移植物(FGG)用于增加后牙种植体周围角化黏膜(KM)的5年疗效。材料与方法:30例(44颗种植体)KM不充分患者(结果:两组随访期间KMW均显著升高。FGG组在随访1个月、2个月及随访6个月后KMW均显著高于CM组。两组均观察到KM萎缩,且在术后前2个月内最大。5年随访时,两组间KM收缩率差异有统计学意义(FGG: 47%;结论:FGG在KM增强和MT增加方面优于CM。除了术后头两天的自我报告出血略有差异外,CM在PROMs中没有显示出其他显着优势。试验注册:ChiCTR1800018285(注册日期:9/9/2018,回顾性注册。URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=24156)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated Segmentation of Graft Material in 1-Stage Sinus Lift Based on Artificial Intelligence: A Retrospective Study. Clinical Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Short Implants Placed in Posterior Maxilla: A Case-Control Study. Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis Adjunctive to Surgical Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Treatment: A Retrospective Study. Extended Platelet-Rich Fibrin as a Membrane for Lateral Window Sinus Lifts: A Case Series. Efficacy of Collagen Matrix for Establishing Keratinized Mucosa at Dental Implants: A 5-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1