Nanomedicine and clinical diagnostics part I: applications in conventional imaging (MRI, X-ray/CT, and ultrasound).

IF 3.9 Nanomedicine (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1080/17435889.2024.2439776
Ahmad Butt, Horacio Bach
{"title":"Nanomedicine and clinical diagnostics part I: applications in conventional imaging (MRI, X-ray/CT, and ultrasound).","authors":"Ahmad Butt, Horacio Bach","doi":"10.1080/17435889.2024.2439776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating nanotechnologies in diagnostic imaging presents a promising step forward compared to traditional methods, which carry certain limitations. Conventional imaging routes, such as X-ray/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, derive significant advantages from nanoparticles (NPs), which allow researchers and clinicians to overcome some of the limitations of traditional imaging agents. In this literature review, we explore recent advancements in nanomaterials being applied in conventional diagnostic imaging techniques by exploring relevant reviews and original research papers (e.g. experimental models and theoretical model studies) in the literature. Collectively, there are numerous nanomaterials currently being examined for use in conventional imaging modalities, and each imaging technique has unique NPs with properties that can be manipulated to answer an array of clinical questions specific to that imaging modality. There are still challenges to consider, including getting regulatory approval for clinical research and routine use about long-term biocompatibility, which collectively emphasize the need for continued research to facilitate the integration of nanotechnology into routine clinical practice. Most importantly, there is a continued need for strong, collaborative efforts between researchers, biomedical engineers, clinicians, and industry stakeholders, which are necessary to bridge the persistent gap between translational ideas and implementation in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74240,"journal":{"name":"Nanomedicine (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"167-182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanomedicine (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17435889.2024.2439776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating nanotechnologies in diagnostic imaging presents a promising step forward compared to traditional methods, which carry certain limitations. Conventional imaging routes, such as X-ray/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, derive significant advantages from nanoparticles (NPs), which allow researchers and clinicians to overcome some of the limitations of traditional imaging agents. In this literature review, we explore recent advancements in nanomaterials being applied in conventional diagnostic imaging techniques by exploring relevant reviews and original research papers (e.g. experimental models and theoretical model studies) in the literature. Collectively, there are numerous nanomaterials currently being examined for use in conventional imaging modalities, and each imaging technique has unique NPs with properties that can be manipulated to answer an array of clinical questions specific to that imaging modality. There are still challenges to consider, including getting regulatory approval for clinical research and routine use about long-term biocompatibility, which collectively emphasize the need for continued research to facilitate the integration of nanotechnology into routine clinical practice. Most importantly, there is a continued need for strong, collaborative efforts between researchers, biomedical engineers, clinicians, and industry stakeholders, which are necessary to bridge the persistent gap between translational ideas and implementation in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳米医学和临床诊断第1部分:在常规成像(MRI, x射线/CT和超声)中的应用。
与传统方法相比,将纳米技术集成到诊断成像中是一个有希望的进步,传统方法具有一定的局限性。传统的成像途径,如x射线/计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像,从纳米颗粒(NPs)中获得了显著的优势,它使研究人员和临床医生能够克服传统显像剂的一些局限性。在这篇文献综述中,我们通过查阅文献中的相关综述和原始研究论文(如实验模型和理论模型研究),探索纳米材料在传统诊断成像技术中的应用的最新进展。总的来说,目前有许多纳米材料正在用于常规成像模式的研究中,每种成像技术都有独特的NPs,其特性可以被操纵来回答一系列特定于该成像模式的临床问题。还有一些挑战需要考虑,包括获得临床研究的监管批准和长期生物相容性的常规使用,这些共同强调了继续研究以促进纳米技术融入常规临床实践的必要性。最重要的是,研究人员、生物医学工程师、临床医生和行业利益相关者之间持续需要强有力的合作努力,这对于弥合转化理念与临床环境实施之间的持续差距是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stiripentol-loaded self-nanoemulsifying delivery system for glioblastoma: therapeutic efficacy in 3D spheroid and xenograft model. Peptide nucleic acid-based biosensor for detection of E. coli with differential pulse voltammetry. Development and characterization of multifunctional dendrimeric nanoconjugates for delivery of rutin: in vitro characterization for potential neuroprotective application. Simultaneous co-delivery of a reporter EGFP gene and doxorubicin to HepG2 cells using AuNPs-Functionalized Graphene Oxide Nanostructures. Nano-icilin-driven TRPM8 activation elicits immunogenic exosomes with antitumor effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1