Unveiling the neural dynamics of the theory of mind: a fMRI study on belief processing phases.

Karolina Golec-Staśkiewicz, Jakub Wojciechowski, Maciej Haman, Tomasz Wolak, Joanna Wysocka, Agnieszka Pluta
{"title":"Unveiling the neural dynamics of the theory of mind: a fMRI study on belief processing phases.","authors":"Karolina Golec-Staśkiewicz, Jakub Wojciechowski, Maciej Haman, Tomasz Wolak, Joanna Wysocka, Agnieszka Pluta","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theory of mind (ToM), the ability to interpret others' behaviors in terms of mental states, has been extensively studied through the False-Belief Task (FBT). However, limited research exists regarding the distinction between different phases of FBT, suggesting that they are subserved by separate neural mechanisms. Further inquiry into this matter seems crucial for deepening our knowledge of the neurocognitive basis of mental-state processing. Therefore, we employed functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to examine neural responses and functional connectivity within the core network for ToM across phases of the FBT, which was administered to 61 healthy adults during scanning. The region-of-interest analysis revealed heightened responses of the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) during and increased activation of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during the outcome phase. Negative connectivity between these regions was observed during belief-formation. Unlike the TPJ, mPFC responded similarly to conditions that require belief reasoning and to control conditions that do not entail tracking mental states. Our results indicate a functional dissociation within the core network for ToM. While the TPJ is possibly engaged in coding beliefs, the mPFC shows no such specificity. These findings advance our understanding of the unique roles of the TPJ and mPFC in mental-state processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM), the ability to interpret others' behaviors in terms of mental states, has been extensively studied through the False-Belief Task (FBT). However, limited research exists regarding the distinction between different phases of FBT, suggesting that they are subserved by separate neural mechanisms. Further inquiry into this matter seems crucial for deepening our knowledge of the neurocognitive basis of mental-state processing. Therefore, we employed functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to examine neural responses and functional connectivity within the core network for ToM across phases of the FBT, which was administered to 61 healthy adults during scanning. The region-of-interest analysis revealed heightened responses of the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) during and increased activation of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during the outcome phase. Negative connectivity between these regions was observed during belief-formation. Unlike the TPJ, mPFC responded similarly to conditions that require belief reasoning and to control conditions that do not entail tracking mental states. Our results indicate a functional dissociation within the core network for ToM. While the TPJ is possibly engaged in coding beliefs, the mPFC shows no such specificity. These findings advance our understanding of the unique roles of the TPJ and mPFC in mental-state processing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示心智理论的神经动力学:信念加工阶段的fMRI研究。
心理理论(ToM)是一种从心理状态来解释他人行为的能力,它通过错误信念任务(FBT)得到了广泛的研究。然而,关于FBT不同阶段之间的区别研究有限,表明它们是由不同的神经机制服务的。对这一问题的进一步研究似乎对加深我们对精神状态处理的神经认知基础的认识至关重要。因此,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来检查跨FBT阶段ToM核心网络内的神经反应和功能连接,在扫描期间对61名健康成人进行FBT。兴趣区分析显示,在结果阶段,颞顶交界处(TPJ)的反应增强,内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)的激活增加。在信念形成过程中观察到这些区域之间的负连接。与TPJ不同,mPFC对需要信念推理的条件和不需要追踪精神状态的控制条件的反应相似。我们的结果表明ToM的核心网络中存在功能性解离。虽然TPJ可能参与信念编码,但mPFC没有显示出这种特异性。这些发现促进了我们对TPJ和mPFC在心理状态处理中的独特作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cognitive and neural underpinnings of friend-prioritization in a perceptual matching task. Emotional characteristics and intrinsic brain network functional connectivity among adults aged 75. Premovement activity in the corticospinal tract is amplified by the placebo effect: an active inference account. Neural mechanisms underlying the interactive exchange of facial emotional expressions. Exercising Self-Control Increases Responsivity to Hedonic and Eudaimonic Rewards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1