{"title":"Slark: A Performance Robust Decentralized Inter-Datacenter Deadline-Aware Coflows Scheduling Framework With Local Information","authors":"Xiaodong Dong;Lihai Nie;Zheli Liu;Yang Xiang","doi":"10.1109/TPDS.2024.3508275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inter-datacenter network applications generate massive coflows for purposes, e.g., backup, synchronization, and analytics, with deadline requirements. Decentralized coflow scheduling frameworks are desirable for their scalability in cross-domain deployment but grappling with the challenge of information agnosticism for lack of cross-domain privileges. Current information-agnostic coflow scheduling methods are incompatible with decentralized frameworks for relying on centralized controllers to continuously monitor and learn from coflow global transmission states to infer global coflow information. Alternative methods propose mechanisms for decentralized global coflow information gathering and synchronization. However, they require dedicated physical hardware or control logic, which could be impractical for incremental deployment. This article proposes Slark, a decentralized deadline-aware coflow scheduling framework, which meets coflows’ soft and hard deadline requirements using only local traffic information. It eschews requiring global coflow transmission states and dedicated hardware or control logic by leveraging multiple software-implemented scheduling agents working independently on each node and integrating such information agnosticism into node-specific bandwidth allocation by modeling it as a robust optimization problem with flow information on the other nodes represented as uncertain parameters. Subsequently, we validate the performance robustness of Slark by investigating how perturbations in the optimal objective function value and the associated optimal solution are affected by uncertain parameters. Finally, we propose a firebug-swarm-optimization-based heuristic algorithm to tackle the non-convexity in our problem. Experimental results demonstrate that Slark can significantly enhance transmission revenue and increase soft and hard deadline guarantee ratios by 10.52% and 7.99% on average.","PeriodicalId":13257,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","volume":"36 2","pages":"197-211"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10770555/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inter-datacenter network applications generate massive coflows for purposes, e.g., backup, synchronization, and analytics, with deadline requirements. Decentralized coflow scheduling frameworks are desirable for their scalability in cross-domain deployment but grappling with the challenge of information agnosticism for lack of cross-domain privileges. Current information-agnostic coflow scheduling methods are incompatible with decentralized frameworks for relying on centralized controllers to continuously monitor and learn from coflow global transmission states to infer global coflow information. Alternative methods propose mechanisms for decentralized global coflow information gathering and synchronization. However, they require dedicated physical hardware or control logic, which could be impractical for incremental deployment. This article proposes Slark, a decentralized deadline-aware coflow scheduling framework, which meets coflows’ soft and hard deadline requirements using only local traffic information. It eschews requiring global coflow transmission states and dedicated hardware or control logic by leveraging multiple software-implemented scheduling agents working independently on each node and integrating such information agnosticism into node-specific bandwidth allocation by modeling it as a robust optimization problem with flow information on the other nodes represented as uncertain parameters. Subsequently, we validate the performance robustness of Slark by investigating how perturbations in the optimal objective function value and the associated optimal solution are affected by uncertain parameters. Finally, we propose a firebug-swarm-optimization-based heuristic algorithm to tackle the non-convexity in our problem. Experimental results demonstrate that Slark can significantly enhance transmission revenue and increase soft and hard deadline guarantee ratios by 10.52% and 7.99% on average.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS) is published monthly. It publishes a range of papers, comments on previously published papers, and survey articles that deal with the parallel and distributed systems research areas of current importance to our readers. Particular areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
a) Parallel and distributed algorithms, focusing on topics such as: models of computation; numerical, combinatorial, and data-intensive parallel algorithms, scalability of algorithms and data structures for parallel and distributed systems, communication and synchronization protocols, network algorithms, scheduling, and load balancing.
b) Applications of parallel and distributed computing, including computational and data-enabled science and engineering, big data applications, parallel crowd sourcing, large-scale social network analysis, management of big data, cloud and grid computing, scientific and biomedical applications, mobile computing, and cyber-physical systems.
c) Parallel and distributed architectures, including architectures for instruction-level and thread-level parallelism; design, analysis, implementation, fault resilience and performance measurements of multiple-processor systems; multicore processors, heterogeneous many-core systems; petascale and exascale systems designs; novel big data architectures; special purpose architectures, including graphics processors, signal processors, network processors, media accelerators, and other special purpose processors and accelerators; impact of technology on architecture; network and interconnect architectures; parallel I/O and storage systems; architecture of the memory hierarchy; power-efficient and green computing architectures; dependable architectures; and performance modeling and evaluation.
d) Parallel and distributed software, including parallel and multicore programming languages and compilers, runtime systems, operating systems, Internet computing and web services, resource management including green computing, middleware for grids, clouds, and data centers, libraries, performance modeling and evaluation, parallel programming paradigms, and programming environments and tools.