Comparison of postoperative blood loss in cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05687-7
Yong Deok Kim, Nicole Cho, Sueen Sohn, Seokjae Park, Hwang Yong You, In Jun Koh
{"title":"Comparison of postoperative blood loss in cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review","authors":"Yong Deok Kim,&nbsp;Nicole Cho,&nbsp;Sueen Sohn,&nbsp;Seokjae Park,&nbsp;Hwang Yong You,&nbsp;In Jun Koh","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05687-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>: With the advancement of porous surface processing technology, cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has once again garnered attention. Cementless TKA lacks cement sealing, raising concerns regarding potential blood loss. Recently, patient blood management (PBM) protocols have been introduced to mitigate postoperative blood loss and transfusions. In this systematic review, we aimed to address whether cementless TKA leads to increased blood loss and transfusion rates as compared with cemented TKA. Additionally, we explored the impact of contemporary PBM protocols on post-TKA hemodynamics.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This systematic review included prospective randomized trials and retrospective studies that compared blood loss and PBM between cementless and cemented TKA. A comprehensive literature search for publications from 1980 onwards was conducted using databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Furthermore, we conducted a thorough examination of the bibliographies of all relevant articles that were retrieved. Studies that met our inclusion criteria were assessed carefully for pertinent data. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Re-views and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42024507236).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of twelve studies were included in this study. Among these, six papers reported lower blood loss in cemented TKA, while the other six papers found no significant difference in perioperative blood loss between the two groups. From the perspective of PBM, seven studies applied PBM protocols including systematic and topical tranexamic acid, autogenous transfusion, strict transfusion threshold and drain clamping, while the remaining five studies did not. If PBM protocols were implemented, no significant difference in blood loss was observed based on the implant fixation method.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the context of recent studies implementing PBM protocols, the choice of implant fixation method appears to have no relevant impact on post-TKA blood loss. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the reporting of outcomes and PBM protocols exhibit considerable variation and heterogeneity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05687-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

: With the advancement of porous surface processing technology, cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has once again garnered attention. Cementless TKA lacks cement sealing, raising concerns regarding potential blood loss. Recently, patient blood management (PBM) protocols have been introduced to mitigate postoperative blood loss and transfusions. In this systematic review, we aimed to address whether cementless TKA leads to increased blood loss and transfusion rates as compared with cemented TKA. Additionally, we explored the impact of contemporary PBM protocols on post-TKA hemodynamics.

Methods

This systematic review included prospective randomized trials and retrospective studies that compared blood loss and PBM between cementless and cemented TKA. A comprehensive literature search for publications from 1980 onwards was conducted using databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Furthermore, we conducted a thorough examination of the bibliographies of all relevant articles that were retrieved. Studies that met our inclusion criteria were assessed carefully for pertinent data. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Re-views and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42024507236).

Results

A total of twelve studies were included in this study. Among these, six papers reported lower blood loss in cemented TKA, while the other six papers found no significant difference in perioperative blood loss between the two groups. From the perspective of PBM, seven studies applied PBM protocols including systematic and topical tranexamic acid, autogenous transfusion, strict transfusion threshold and drain clamping, while the remaining five studies did not. If PBM protocols were implemented, no significant difference in blood loss was observed based on the implant fixation method.

Conclusion

In the context of recent studies implementing PBM protocols, the choice of implant fixation method appears to have no relevant impact on post-TKA blood loss. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the reporting of outcomes and PBM protocols exhibit considerable variation and heterogeneity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无骨水泥和骨水泥全膝关节置换术术后出血量的比较:一项系统综述
导言:随着多孔表面处理技术的进步,无骨水泥全膝关节置换术(TKA)再次受到人们的关注。无水泥TKA缺乏水泥密封,增加了对潜在失血的担忧。最近,引入了患者血液管理(PBM)方案来减轻术后失血和输血。在这篇系统综述中,我们旨在探讨与骨水泥TKA相比,无骨水泥TKA是否会导致失血和输血率增加。此外,我们探讨了当代PBM方案对tka后血流动力学的影响。方法本系统综述包括前瞻性随机试验和回顾性研究,比较无骨水泥和骨水泥TKA的失血量和PBM。使用PubMed、MEDLINE和EMBASE等数据库对1980年以来的出版物进行了全面的文献检索。此外,我们对检索到的所有相关文章的参考书目进行了彻底的检查。我们对符合纳入标准的研究进行了仔细的相关数据评估。该系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024507236)中注册。结果本研究共纳入12项研究。其中,有6篇文献报道了骨水泥TKA组的出血量较低,另外6篇文献报道了两组围手术期出血量无显著差异。从PBM的角度来看,7项研究采用了PBM方案,包括系统和局部氨甲环酸、自体输血、严格输血阈值和引流夹紧,其余5项研究未采用PBM方案。如果采用PBM方案,则根据植入物固定方法观察到的失血量无显著差异。结论在最近实施PBM方案的研究中,种植体固定方法的选择似乎对tka后失血没有相关影响。然而,值得注意的是,结果报告和PBM方案表现出相当大的差异和异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Pelvic insufficiency fractures after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer in female patients: an updated meta-analysis of 11,272 patients. The ulna osteotomy locking plate II in patients with ulnocarpal impaction syndrome: a retrospective evaluation. Tranexamic acid reduces transfusion requirements after pelvic osteotomy: a nationwide propensity score-matched analysis. Revision rate of large head diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: long-term results Influence of different preservation methods on the mechanical in vitro stability of bones: a comparative study using porcine metatarsals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1