Efficacy of preemptive multimodal analgesia initiated at various time points before total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05621-x
Qiuru Wang, Xingcheng Li, Jian Hu, Changjun Chen, Jing Yang, Pengde Kang
{"title":"Efficacy of preemptive multimodal analgesia initiated at various time points before total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial","authors":"Qiuru Wang,&nbsp;Xingcheng Li,&nbsp;Jian Hu,&nbsp;Changjun Chen,&nbsp;Jing Yang,&nbsp;Pengde Kang","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05621-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Preemptive multimodal analgesia (PMA) is commonly employed for pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal timing for initiating PMA remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of PMA administered at different time points before TKA.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 120 patients who underwent TKA were randomized into three groups. PMA (200 mg celecoxib and 150 mg pregabalin administered every 12 h) was initiated 48 h (group A), 24 h (group B), and 1 h (group C) before surgery. The primary outcome was the postoperative administration of morphine hydrochloride as a rescue analgesic. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative pain assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), functional recovery assessed by knee motion range and ambulation distance, time until hospital discharge, and complication rates.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with group C, groups A and B exhibited significantly lower morphine consumption within 24 h after surgery, lower total morphine consumption, longer time to first rescue analgesia, and superior range of knee motion on the day of surgery. Groups A and B did not exhibit significant differences in these outcomes. The three groups did not differ significantly in postoperative VAS pain scores, ambulation distance, length of hospital stay, or complication rates.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In comparison with PMA starting at 1 h preoperatively, initiating PMA at 24 and 48 h preoperatively provided better postoperative pain relief. Considering the aim of minimizing the amount of ineffective medication received by patients, initiating PMA at 24 h preoperatively may be a more favorable option for patients undergoing TKA. However, the clinical significance of our results and the optimal starting time for PMA require further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05621-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Preemptive multimodal analgesia (PMA) is commonly employed for pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal timing for initiating PMA remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of PMA administered at different time points before TKA.

Materials and methods

In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 120 patients who underwent TKA were randomized into three groups. PMA (200 mg celecoxib and 150 mg pregabalin administered every 12 h) was initiated 48 h (group A), 24 h (group B), and 1 h (group C) before surgery. The primary outcome was the postoperative administration of morphine hydrochloride as a rescue analgesic. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative pain assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), functional recovery assessed by knee motion range and ambulation distance, time until hospital discharge, and complication rates.

Results

Compared with group C, groups A and B exhibited significantly lower morphine consumption within 24 h after surgery, lower total morphine consumption, longer time to first rescue analgesia, and superior range of knee motion on the day of surgery. Groups A and B did not exhibit significant differences in these outcomes. The three groups did not differ significantly in postoperative VAS pain scores, ambulation distance, length of hospital stay, or complication rates.

Conclusions

In comparison with PMA starting at 1 h preoperatively, initiating PMA at 24 and 48 h preoperatively provided better postoperative pain relief. Considering the aim of minimizing the amount of ineffective medication received by patients, initiating PMA at 24 h preoperatively may be a more favorable option for patients undergoing TKA. However, the clinical significance of our results and the optimal starting time for PMA require further investigation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术前不同时间点先发制人多模式镇痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲随机对照试验
预防性多模态镇痛(PMA)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后疼痛控制的常用方法。然而,启动PMA的最佳时机仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较TKA前不同时间点给予PMA的疗效。材料和方法在这项前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验中,120例接受TKA的患者被随机分为三组。术前48小时(A组)、24小时(B组)和1小时(C组)开始PMA (200 mg塞来昔布和150 mg普瑞巴林,每12小时给药一次)。主要结果是术后给予盐酸吗啡作为救急镇痛药。次要结果包括首次镇痛时间、术后疼痛用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估、膝关节活动范围和行走距离评估功能恢复、出院时间和并发症发生率。结果与C组比较,A组和B组术后24 h内吗啡用量明显减少,吗啡总用量明显减少,首次抢救镇痛时间较长,手术当日膝关节活动范围明显改善。A组和B组在这些结果上没有显着差异。三组在术后VAS疼痛评分、行走距离、住院时间或并发症发生率方面无显著差异。结论与术前1 h开始PMA相比,术前24 h和48 h开始PMA能更好地缓解术后疼痛。考虑到最大限度地减少患者接受无效药物的数量,术前24小时开始PMA可能是TKA患者更有利的选择。然而,我们的结果的临床意义和PMA的最佳起始时间需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Optimal timing for hemodialysis in relation to hip fracture surgery for patients with end-stage renal disease 20 years of blood management and VTE prevention in orthopedic surgery in the Netherlands – a nationwide survey The use of communication applications in orthopaedics: a scoping review Analysis of mental health outcomes in major versus minor upper extremity amputations: a retrospective national database study Double-row wired anchors combined with “8” cross tension bands: an innovative procedure for the treatment of inferior pole fractures of the patella and its finite element and biomechanical evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1