Optimizing total hip arthroplasty: the gripper table mounted system for enhanced soft tissue preservation and postoperative outcomes

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05625-7
Kentaro Iwakiri, Yoichi Ohta, Yukihide Minoda, Shuhei Ueno, Akio Kobayashi, Hiroaki Nakamura
{"title":"Optimizing total hip arthroplasty: the gripper table mounted system for enhanced soft tissue preservation and postoperative outcomes","authors":"Kentaro Iwakiri,&nbsp;Yoichi Ohta,&nbsp;Yukihide Minoda,&nbsp;Shuhei Ueno,&nbsp;Akio Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05625-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In total hip arthroplasty (THA), soft tissue retraction is crucial, but traditional methods may cause damage. This study addresses the issue by introducing the Gripper Table Mounted System, a pulley-based retraction system. The research compares THA outcomes with and without the Gripper system, whether reducing soft tissue damage and postoperative pain. The Gripper, with its unique design, aims to minimize tissue damage during surgery.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study conducted a retrospective analysis of 180 patients (180 hips) who underwent THA via an antero-lateral approach with the Gripper System or conventional retraction methods. Primary outcomes included gluteus medius cross-sectional area and hip abductor muscle strength. Secondary outcomes were pain VAS, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, laboratory data, and WOMAC score.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The study compared outcomes between those using the Gripper System (Gripper + group, <i>n</i> = 58) and those without (Gripper - group, <i>n</i> = 122). Both groups exhibited no significant differences in demographics or operative parameters. Gripper + group showed enhanced recovery in gluteus medius cross-sectional area and hip abductor muscle strength, with significant analgesia at various postoperative time points. No complications were noted in either group.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Gripper system proved effective in early analgesia, swift recovery of hip strength, and preserving muscle area. Its single-use, sterile, and compact design offers advantages over traditional retractor holders or human assistance, potentially reducing soft tissue damage and postoperative pain. This study concluded the Gripper system’s value in reducing pain and restoring strength in THA.</p><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Therapeutic Level III.</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>The University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) registration number UMIN000052948.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05625-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), soft tissue retraction is crucial, but traditional methods may cause damage. This study addresses the issue by introducing the Gripper Table Mounted System, a pulley-based retraction system. The research compares THA outcomes with and without the Gripper system, whether reducing soft tissue damage and postoperative pain. The Gripper, with its unique design, aims to minimize tissue damage during surgery.

Materials and methods

The study conducted a retrospective analysis of 180 patients (180 hips) who underwent THA via an antero-lateral approach with the Gripper System or conventional retraction methods. Primary outcomes included gluteus medius cross-sectional area and hip abductor muscle strength. Secondary outcomes were pain VAS, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, laboratory data, and WOMAC score.

Results

The study compared outcomes between those using the Gripper System (Gripper + group, n = 58) and those without (Gripper - group, n = 122). Both groups exhibited no significant differences in demographics or operative parameters. Gripper + group showed enhanced recovery in gluteus medius cross-sectional area and hip abductor muscle strength, with significant analgesia at various postoperative time points. No complications were noted in either group.

Conclusions

The Gripper system proved effective in early analgesia, swift recovery of hip strength, and preserving muscle area. Its single-use, sterile, and compact design offers advantages over traditional retractor holders or human assistance, potentially reducing soft tissue damage and postoperative pain. This study concluded the Gripper system’s value in reducing pain and restoring strength in THA.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level III.

Trial registration

The University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) registration number UMIN000052948.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化全髋关节置换术:用于增强软组织保存和术后结果的夹具安装系统
背景在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,软组织收缩是至关重要的,但传统的方法可能会造成损伤。本研究通过引入一种基于滑轮的收放系统——夹手工作台安装系统来解决这个问题。该研究比较了有和没有Gripper系统的THA结果,是否减少了软组织损伤和术后疼痛。该夹具设计独特,旨在最大限度地减少手术过程中的组织损伤。材料和方法本研究回顾性分析了180例(180髋)经前外侧入路、夹持系统或常规内收方法行THA手术的患者。主要结果包括臀中肌横截面积和髋外展肌力量。次要结果为疼痛、VAS、术中出血、手术时间、实验室数据和WOMAC评分。结果本研究比较了使用Gripper系统的患者(Gripper +组,n = 58)和未使用Gripper系统的患者(n = 122)的结果。两组在人口统计学和手术参数上均无显著差异。夹持+组臀中肌横截面积和髋外展肌力量恢复增强,术后各时间点均有明显镇痛作用。两组均无并发症发生。结论该系统具有早期镇痛、快速恢复髋部力量、保留肌肉面积等优点。它的一次性使用,无菌和紧凑的设计比传统的牵开支架或人工辅助具有优势,潜在地减少软组织损伤和术后疼痛。本研究总结了grip系统在THA中减轻疼痛和恢复力量方面的价值。证据水平:治疗性III级。试验注册大学医院医疗信息网(UMIN)注册号为UMIN000052948。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Impact of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation on implant complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a propensity-matched cohort study Comparative analysis of posterior column screw trajectories: pararectus vs. lateral window of the pelvis Risk of infection after knee arthroscopy and after intra-articular steroid injections (IASI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) Vascular bone tumors of the pelvis and extremities: an 18-case clinical and radiological analysis Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for isolated radial head fractures: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1