Effect of final irrigation protocols on the structural integrity and mechanical properties of the root dentine.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0072
Julia Menezes Savaris, Maria Eduarda Paz Dotto, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva, Bruno Alexandre Pacheco de Castro Henriques, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi
{"title":"Effect of final irrigation protocols on the structural integrity and mechanical properties of the root dentine.","authors":"Julia Menezes Savaris, Maria Eduarda Paz Dotto, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva, Bruno Alexandre Pacheco de Castro Henriques, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the effects of different final irrigation protocols on the mechanical properties and structural integrity of root dentine. One-hundred eight teeth were instrumented and irrigated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) using conventional irrigation (CI). Teeth were distributed into four groups based on final irrigation protocols: Control Group (CG): 17%EDTA/CI + H2O; G1: 2.5%NaOCl/Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) + EDTA/PUI + NaOCl/PUI (60s each); G2: EDTA/PUI + NaOCl/PUI (30s each); G3: EDTA/PUI + NaOCl/PUI + H2O/PUI + CHX/PUI (30s each). Four tests were conducted: three-point flexural strength test, Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis, microhardness assessment, and the push-out bond strength (POBS) of the filling material to the root dentine. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (Flexural strength), and Student t-test (Microhardness). Erosion scores and POBS were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05). Results indicated no significant differences in flexural strength (p > 0.05) among groups. CG exhibited the lowest erosion scores in the cervical third. In the middle third, CG had lower scores than G1 and G2, while in the apical third, CG had lower scores than G1 (p < 0.05). Microhardness values decreased following the protocols (p < 0.05), except for the CG (p > 0.05). G2 displayed higher POBS values in the middle and apical thirds (p < 0.05). The protocols did not significantly influence the flexural strength of root dentine. However, they did affect microhardness and promoted greater erosion. The best results for POBS were observed when the final irrigation involved the sequential use of EDTA and NaOCl employing PUI for 30 seconds in each solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"38 ","pages":"e072"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the effects of different final irrigation protocols on the mechanical properties and structural integrity of root dentine. One-hundred eight teeth were instrumented and irrigated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) using conventional irrigation (CI). Teeth were distributed into four groups based on final irrigation protocols: Control Group (CG): 17%EDTA/CI + H2O; G1: 2.5%NaOCl/Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) + EDTA/PUI + NaOCl/PUI (60s each); G2: EDTA/PUI + NaOCl/PUI (30s each); G3: EDTA/PUI + NaOCl/PUI + H2O/PUI + CHX/PUI (30s each). Four tests were conducted: three-point flexural strength test, Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis, microhardness assessment, and the push-out bond strength (POBS) of the filling material to the root dentine. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (Flexural strength), and Student t-test (Microhardness). Erosion scores and POBS were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05). Results indicated no significant differences in flexural strength (p > 0.05) among groups. CG exhibited the lowest erosion scores in the cervical third. In the middle third, CG had lower scores than G1 and G2, while in the apical third, CG had lower scores than G1 (p < 0.05). Microhardness values decreased following the protocols (p < 0.05), except for the CG (p > 0.05). G2 displayed higher POBS values in the middle and apical thirds (p < 0.05). The protocols did not significantly influence the flexural strength of root dentine. However, they did affect microhardness and promoted greater erosion. The best results for POBS were observed when the final irrigation involved the sequential use of EDTA and NaOCl employing PUI for 30 seconds in each solution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial activity of PMMA enriched with nano-clay loaded with metronidazole and chlorhexidine. Effect of curcumin and three analogues on pre-osteoblast cells' viability, differentiation, and gene expression. Effect of final irrigation protocols on the structural integrity and mechanical properties of the root dentine. Fatigue behavior of sintered, glazed and glass-infiltrated surfaces of 5Y-PSZ bonded plates. Fractal analysis and assessment of lacunarity in mandibular osteoradionecrosis: a cross-sectional study with control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1