Artificial intelligence aided serum protein electrophoresis analysis of Finnish patient samples: Retrospective validation

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinica Chimica Acta Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2024.120086
Tapio Lahtiharju , Lassi Paavolainen , Janne Suvisaari , Pasi Nokelainen , Emmi Rotgers , Mikko Anttonen , Outi Itkonen
{"title":"Artificial intelligence aided serum protein electrophoresis analysis of Finnish patient samples: Retrospective validation","authors":"Tapio Lahtiharju ,&nbsp;Lassi Paavolainen ,&nbsp;Janne Suvisaari ,&nbsp;Pasi Nokelainen ,&nbsp;Emmi Rotgers ,&nbsp;Mikko Anttonen ,&nbsp;Outi Itkonen","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2024.120086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Serum protein electrophoresis interpretation requires a substantial amount of manual work. In 2020, Chabrun <em>et al.</em> created a machine learning method called SPECTR for the task. We aimed to validate and test the SPECTR method against our results of more precise immunofixation electrophoresis.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We gathered 34 625 patients and their first serum protein electrophoresis sample in Helsinki University Hospital. We trained three neural network models: (1) a fractionation model to fractionate electropherograms; (2) a classification model to classify samples to normal, ambiguous, and abnormal (<em>i.e.</em> containing paraprotein); (3) an integration model to predict concentration and location of paraproteins.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The fractionation model demonstrated an error rate of ≤0.33 g/L in 95 % samples. The classification model achieved an area under the curve of 97 % in receiver operating characteristic analysis. The integration model demonstrated a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.991 and a root-mean-square error of 1.37 g/L in linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The neural network models proved to be suitable for partial automation in serum protein electrophoresis reporting, <em>i.e.</em> classification of normal electropherograms. Furthermore, the models can accurately suggest the location and concentration of paraproteins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"567 ","pages":"Article 120086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898124023398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Serum protein electrophoresis interpretation requires a substantial amount of manual work. In 2020, Chabrun et al. created a machine learning method called SPECTR for the task. We aimed to validate and test the SPECTR method against our results of more precise immunofixation electrophoresis.

Materials and methods

We gathered 34 625 patients and their first serum protein electrophoresis sample in Helsinki University Hospital. We trained three neural network models: (1) a fractionation model to fractionate electropherograms; (2) a classification model to classify samples to normal, ambiguous, and abnormal (i.e. containing paraprotein); (3) an integration model to predict concentration and location of paraproteins.

Results

The fractionation model demonstrated an error rate of ≤0.33 g/L in 95 % samples. The classification model achieved an area under the curve of 97 % in receiver operating characteristic analysis. The integration model demonstrated a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.991 and a root-mean-square error of 1.37 g/L in linear regression.

Conclusion

The neural network models proved to be suitable for partial automation in serum protein electrophoresis reporting, i.e. classification of normal electropherograms. Furthermore, the models can accurately suggest the location and concentration of paraproteins.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能辅助血清蛋白电泳分析芬兰患者样本:回顾性验证。
背景和目的:血清蛋白电泳解释需要大量的手工工作。2020年,Chabrun等人为该任务创建了一种名为specr的机器学习方法。我们的目的是根据更精确的免疫固定电泳结果验证和测试spectrr方法。材料与方法:在赫尔辛基大学医院收集34 625例患者及其首次血清蛋白电泳样本。我们训练了三个神经网络模型:(1)对电泳图进行分选的分选模型;(2)分类模型,将样本分为正常、模糊和异常(即含有副蛋白);(3)预测副蛋白浓度和位置的集成模型。结果:在95% %的样品中,模型的误差≤0.33 g/L。该分类模型在受试者工作特性分析中的曲线下面积达到97% %。综合模型线性回归的决定系数(R2)为0.991,均方根误差为1.37 g/L。结论:神经网络模型适用于血清蛋白电泳报告的部分自动化,即正常电泳图的分类。此外,该模型可以准确地显示副蛋白的位置和浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Chimica Acta
Clinica Chimica Acta 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
1268
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells. The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Soluble thrombomodulin in preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis". [Clin. Chimica Acta 549 (2024) 120323]. Corrigendum to "Do PHI and PHI density improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer only in the PSA gray zone?" [Clin. Chim. Acta 542 (2023) 117270]. Retraction notice to "A novel sensor to estimate the prevalence of hypochlorous (HOCl) toxicity in individuals with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia" [Clin. Chim. Acta 458 (2016) 144-153]. Corrigendum to "The predictive value of serum mRNA-RGS10 for the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis" [Clin. Chim. Acta 578 (2026) 120531]. Corrigendum to "HbA1c: Gender & age differences in non-diabetic Saudi children & adults in Alqassim Buraidah region" [Clin. Chim. Acta 558(Supplement 1) (2024) 118001].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1