The SurVey of barriers for Vaginal access surgerY (SaVVY) Study: The SaVVY Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.002
Gabriela E Halder, Cecile A Ferrando, Rebecca Rogers, Caren Elhenawy, Cara L Grimes, Sunil Balgobin, Rosanne M Kho, Andrew I Sokol
{"title":"The SurVey of barriers for Vaginal access surgerY (SaVVY) Study: The SaVVY Study.","authors":"Gabriela E Halder, Cecile A Ferrando, Rebecca Rogers, Caren Elhenawy, Cara L Grimes, Sunil Balgobin, Rosanne M Kho, Andrew I Sokol","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to describe vaginal hysterectomy practice patterns as well as facilitators and inhibitors to performing vaginal hysterectomy among gynecologic surgeons. Secondary objectives were to describe facilitators and inhibitors to the teaching and training of vaginal hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative analysis of an online survey and qualitative analyses of the one-on-one interviews on gynecologic surgeons was conducted. This study was approved by the IRB.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey and one-on -one virtual interviews.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Members of the AAGL and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 505 gynecologic surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons were white (66.9%) and had a clinic in North America (67.5%). About 48% of respondents reported \"no barrier\" to performing vaginal hysterectomies including pathology, visualization and exposure, and performance of concomitant procedures. Higher surgical volume was the only factor most commonly rated by surgeons as enabling teaching of vaginal hysterectomy \"quite a bit\" (31.3%). Most surgeons agreed that vaginal hysterectomies are important to women's health (82.8%) and that all gynecologic surgeons should be able to perform vaginal hysterectomies (66.3%). In terms of medical education and training, most surgeons thought that residents should be required to achieve competency for vaginal hysterectomy prior to graduation (71.7%) and disagreed (56.0%) that we should eliminate residency graduation requirements for vaginal hysterectomy numbers. From the one-on-one interviews, major themes identified included: Advocacy, Centralizing Efforts, Compensation and Incentives, Cycle of Low Experience, Decreasing Regional Trends, Lack of Industry Support, Transvaginal versus Laparoscopy Culture, Varied Training Targets and Resources, Innovations in Training, and Self-Motivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaginal hysterectomy remains important to our field. Identified barriers and major themes from this study can direct future efforts to increase its adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: The primary objective of this study was to describe vaginal hysterectomy practice patterns as well as facilitators and inhibitors to performing vaginal hysterectomy among gynecologic surgeons. Secondary objectives were to describe facilitators and inhibitors to the teaching and training of vaginal hysterectomy.

Design: Quantitative analysis of an online survey and qualitative analyses of the one-on-one interviews on gynecologic surgeons was conducted. This study was approved by the IRB.

Setting: Online survey and one-on -one virtual interviews.

Participants: Members of the AAGL and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 505 gynecologic surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons were white (66.9%) and had a clinic in North America (67.5%). About 48% of respondents reported "no barrier" to performing vaginal hysterectomies including pathology, visualization and exposure, and performance of concomitant procedures. Higher surgical volume was the only factor most commonly rated by surgeons as enabling teaching of vaginal hysterectomy "quite a bit" (31.3%). Most surgeons agreed that vaginal hysterectomies are important to women's health (82.8%) and that all gynecologic surgeons should be able to perform vaginal hysterectomies (66.3%). In terms of medical education and training, most surgeons thought that residents should be required to achieve competency for vaginal hysterectomy prior to graduation (71.7%) and disagreed (56.0%) that we should eliminate residency graduation requirements for vaginal hysterectomy numbers. From the one-on-one interviews, major themes identified included: Advocacy, Centralizing Efforts, Compensation and Incentives, Cycle of Low Experience, Decreasing Regional Trends, Lack of Industry Support, Transvaginal versus Laparoscopy Culture, Varied Training Targets and Resources, Innovations in Training, and Self-Motivation.

Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy remains important to our field. Identified barriers and major themes from this study can direct future efforts to increase its adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道手术障碍调查(SaVVY)研究:SaVVY研究。
研究目的:本研究的主要目的是描述阴道子宫切除术的实践模式,以及妇科外科医生进行阴道子宫切除术的促进因素和抑制因素。次要目的是描述阴道子宫切除术教学和培训的促进因素和抑制因素。设计:对妇科外科医生的在线调查进行定量分析,对一对一访谈进行定性分析。本研究已获IRB批准。设置:在线调查和一对一的虚拟访谈。干预措施:无测量方法和主要结果:共有505名妇科外科医生完成了调查。大多数外科医生是白人(66.9%),在北美有诊所(67.5%)。约48%的受访者表示,阴道子宫切除术“没有障碍”,包括病理、可视化和暴露,以及伴随手术的执行。较高的手术量是唯一最常被外科医生评为能够“相当多”地教授阴道子宫切除术的因素(31.3%)。大多数外科医生认为阴道子宫切除术对妇女健康很重要(82.8%),所有妇科外科医生都应该能够进行阴道子宫切除术(66.3%)。在医学教育和培训方面,大多数外科医生(71.7%)认为应要求住院医师在毕业前达到阴道子宫切除术的能力,不同意(56.0%)取消对阴道子宫切除术数量的住院医师毕业要求。从一对一的访谈中,确定的主要主题包括:倡导、集中努力、补偿和激励、低经验周期、区域趋势下降、缺乏行业支持、阴道与腹腔镜文化、不同的培训目标和资源、培训创新和自我激励。结论:阴道子宫切除术在本领域仍具有重要意义。从这项研究中确定的障碍和主要主题可以指导未来增加其采用的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
期刊最新文献
Work Related Pain in Gynecologic Surgeons - A National Survey. Prolapse of residual submucosal leiomyoma following hysteroscopic myomectomy. Insights from the Inaugural JMIG Associate Editors. Cheek acupuncture reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Preoperative Medication for Ovarian Endometrioma Reduces Cyst Size and PainBut Not rASRM score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1