Work Related Pain in Gynecologic Surgeons - A National Survey

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.014
Riley J. Young MD , Alexis Allen BS, MHS , Donald McIntire PhD , Erica F. Robinson MD , Olga Bougie MD, MPH , Kimberly A. Kho MD, MPH
{"title":"Work Related Pain in Gynecologic Surgeons - A National Survey","authors":"Riley J. Young MD ,&nbsp;Alexis Allen BS, MHS ,&nbsp;Donald McIntire PhD ,&nbsp;Erica F. Robinson MD ,&nbsp;Olga Bougie MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Kho MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to: (1) ascertain the prevalence of work-related pain among gynecologic surgeons, (2) describe the risk factors and sequelae of pain, and (3) assess the need for an ergonomic curriculum.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Survey study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The survey was electronically administered.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Gynecologic surgery subspecialists and fellows in training, and Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists who performed gynecologic surgery were included.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>A 38-question anonymous survey was developed from the available ergonomic literature and had 3 main sections: (1) demographic information, (2) pain history, and (3) ergonomic education. A total of 305 gynecologic surgeons participated in the study. Of these, 76.7% were female. Most respondents were Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeons (64.6%) with conventional laparoscopy as the primary surgical modality (65.6%). Of the respondents, 95.7% reported experiencing pain during or after surgery. Female surgeons (p = .018), shorter surgeons (OR = 2.4, 95% confidence interval [1.1, 5.4]), and those with a smaller gloves (p = .025) were more likely to report severe pain. Surgeons who reported worse pain were more likely to seek treatment (p = .007) and to take time off from operating (p &lt;.001). Among the respondents, 79.4% reported engaging in various interventions to treat surgery-related pain. Due to pain, 23.9% reported changing the surgical modality, and 62.5% were concerned about their ability to operate in the future. Of the surgeons, 61.3% did not feel confident in their ability to set up their operating room ergonomically. 98.0% recommend formal ergonomic training for residents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Surgeons are at risk of work-related pain. Gynecologic surgeons have been understudied and face specific ergonomic challenges. In this national survey of high-volume gynecologic surgeons of various subspecialties, we report a high rate of surgery-related pain and significant clinical and nonclinical sequelae of pain, and demonstrate the need to implement and improve ergonomic training for Obstetrics and Gynecology trainees.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"32 7","pages":"Pages 614-620.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465025000354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objective

This study aimed to: (1) ascertain the prevalence of work-related pain among gynecologic surgeons, (2) describe the risk factors and sequelae of pain, and (3) assess the need for an ergonomic curriculum.

Design

Survey study.

Setting

The survey was electronically administered.

Participants

Gynecologic surgery subspecialists and fellows in training, and Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists who performed gynecologic surgery were included.

Measurements and Main Results

A 38-question anonymous survey was developed from the available ergonomic literature and had 3 main sections: (1) demographic information, (2) pain history, and (3) ergonomic education. A total of 305 gynecologic surgeons participated in the study. Of these, 76.7% were female. Most respondents were Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeons (64.6%) with conventional laparoscopy as the primary surgical modality (65.6%). Of the respondents, 95.7% reported experiencing pain during or after surgery. Female surgeons (p = .018), shorter surgeons (OR = 2.4, 95% confidence interval [1.1, 5.4]), and those with a smaller gloves (p = .025) were more likely to report severe pain. Surgeons who reported worse pain were more likely to seek treatment (p = .007) and to take time off from operating (p <.001). Among the respondents, 79.4% reported engaging in various interventions to treat surgery-related pain. Due to pain, 23.9% reported changing the surgical modality, and 62.5% were concerned about their ability to operate in the future. Of the surgeons, 61.3% did not feel confident in their ability to set up their operating room ergonomically. 98.0% recommend formal ergonomic training for residents.

Conclusions

Surgeons are at risk of work-related pain. Gynecologic surgeons have been understudied and face specific ergonomic challenges. In this national survey of high-volume gynecologic surgeons of various subspecialties, we report a high rate of surgery-related pain and significant clinical and nonclinical sequelae of pain, and demonstrate the need to implement and improve ergonomic training for Obstetrics and Gynecology trainees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科外科医生的工作相关疼痛-一项全国性调查。
研究目的:本研究的目的是:1)确定妇科外科医生工作相关疼痛的患病率;2)描述疼痛的风险因素和后遗症;3)评估人体工程学课程的必要性。研究设计:调查研究。设置:调查采用电子方式。参与者:包括妇科外科专科医生和正在接受培训的研究员,以及从事妇科手术的妇产科专家。测量方法:一项包含38个问题的匿名调查是根据现有的人体工程学文献进行的,主要有三个部分:1)人口统计信息,2)疼痛史,3)人体工程学教育。主要结果:305名妇科外科医生参与。76.7%为女性。大多数受访者是微创妇科外科医生(64.6%),主要手术方式是常规腹腔镜(65.6%)。95.7%的受访者表示手术中或手术后疼痛。女性外科医生(p = .018)、身材较矮的外科医生(OR = 2.4,95% CI[1.1, 5.4])和手套尺寸较小的外科医生(p = .025)更有可能报告严重疼痛。报告疼痛更严重的外科医生更有可能寻求治疗(p = .007)并暂停手术(p < .001)。79.4%的受访者表示参与了各种干预措施来治疗手术相关的疼痛。由于疼痛,23.9%的人报告改变了手术方式,62.5%的外科医生担心他们未来的手术能力。61.3%的外科医生对其符合人体工程学的手术室设置能力没有信心。98.0%建议对住院医师进行正式的人体工程学培训。结论:外科医生存在工作相关疼痛的风险。妇科外科医生是一个未被充分研究的人群,具有特定的人体工程学挑战。在这项针对不同亚专科的大量妇科外科医生的全国性调查中,我们报告了手术相关疼痛的高发生率,疼痛的显著临床和非临床后遗症,并证明了实施和改进妇产科学员人体工程学培训的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
期刊最新文献
A Wandering Fibroid's Journey: A Primary Parasitic Myoma. T-shaped uterus metroplasty is associated with increased live birth rate in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: evidence form a matched case-control study. Static Digital Twins for Surgical Planning in Complex Gynecologic Cancer Recurrence: A Proof-of-Concept Feasibility study. Comparison of Indocyanine Green as a Standalone Tracer Versus Technetium-99m Combined with Blue Dye for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Vulvar Cancer. Hysteroscopy contribution in unlocated pregnancy localization diagnosis and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1