Attitudes Toward Medical Assistance in Dying Among Swedish Palliative Care Professionals.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0183
Mikael Segerlantz, Ingela Beck, Joar Björk, Mattias Elmlund, Carl Johan Fürst, Juliet Jacobsen, Birgit Rasmussen, Maria E C Schelin
{"title":"Attitudes Toward Medical Assistance in Dying Among Swedish Palliative Care Professionals.","authors":"Mikael Segerlantz, Ingela Beck, Joar Björk, Mattias Elmlund, Carl Johan Fürst, Juliet Jacobsen, Birgit Rasmussen, Maria E C Schelin","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The debate over legalizing medical assistance in dying (assisted dying) is ongoing, also in Nordic countries such as Sweden where assisted dying is illegal. A 2020 survey by the Swedish Medical Association highlighted varied perspectives, with 41% of physicians supporting and 34% opposing legalization. Professionals in palliative care were more negative toward it. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess attitudes toward the legalization of, and the need for education about, assisted dying among Swedish palliative care professionals. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> A survey with 19 closed- and 2 open-ended questions was administered to the participants of the 2023 Swedish National Conference on Palliative Care (including physicians, nurses, assistant nurses, administrators, and researchers). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 866 conference participants who were invited, 444 (51%) participated. Predominantly, the cohort comprised women (89%); 60% were nurses and 17% physicians. The results showed that 38% opposed euthanasia, 36% supported it, and 26% remained undecided, with similar findings regarding physician-assisted suicide. There was a significant trend of increasingly negative attitudes with age and experience in palliative care (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Physicians emerged as the group most opposed to euthanasia (80%), whereas assistant nurses were the most positive, with 13% opposing legalization, and 33% of the nurses opposed euthanasia. The open-ended questions revealed thoughts regarding the complexity of the issue and the need for further discussion and education. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In Sweden, where euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is illegal, more than one-third of palliative care professionals were in favor of legalizing these practices while one-fourth were undecided, these proportions differed markedly between professions. Further, we uncovered a significant need for further discussion and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"175-184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The debate over legalizing medical assistance in dying (assisted dying) is ongoing, also in Nordic countries such as Sweden where assisted dying is illegal. A 2020 survey by the Swedish Medical Association highlighted varied perspectives, with 41% of physicians supporting and 34% opposing legalization. Professionals in palliative care were more negative toward it. Objective: To assess attitudes toward the legalization of, and the need for education about, assisted dying among Swedish palliative care professionals. Study Design: A survey with 19 closed- and 2 open-ended questions was administered to the participants of the 2023 Swedish National Conference on Palliative Care (including physicians, nurses, assistant nurses, administrators, and researchers). Results: Of the 866 conference participants who were invited, 444 (51%) participated. Predominantly, the cohort comprised women (89%); 60% were nurses and 17% physicians. The results showed that 38% opposed euthanasia, 36% supported it, and 26% remained undecided, with similar findings regarding physician-assisted suicide. There was a significant trend of increasingly negative attitudes with age and experience in palliative care (p < 0.01). Physicians emerged as the group most opposed to euthanasia (80%), whereas assistant nurses were the most positive, with 13% opposing legalization, and 33% of the nurses opposed euthanasia. The open-ended questions revealed thoughts regarding the complexity of the issue and the need for further discussion and education. Conclusion: In Sweden, where euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is illegal, more than one-third of palliative care professionals were in favor of legalizing these practices while one-fourth were undecided, these proportions differed markedly between professions. Further, we uncovered a significant need for further discussion and education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典姑息治疗专业人员对死亡医疗援助的态度。
背景:关于医疗协助死亡(协助死亡)合法化的辩论正在进行,在瑞典等协助死亡是非法的北欧国家也是如此。瑞典医学协会2020年的一项调查突显了不同的观点,41%的医生支持大麻合法化,34%的医生反对。姑息治疗专业人士对此持更消极的态度。目的:评估瑞典姑息治疗专业人员对协助死亡合法化的态度,以及对协助死亡教育的必要性。研究设计:对2023年瑞典全国姑息治疗会议的参与者(包括医生、护士、助理护士、管理人员和研究人员)进行了一项调查,其中有19个封闭式问题和2个开放式问题。结果:在被邀请的866名与会者中,有444人(51%)参加了会议。主要由女性组成(89%);60%为护士,17%为医生。结果显示,38%的人反对安乐死,36%的人支持,26%的人未定,关于医生协助自杀的调查结果也类似。随着年龄和经验的增加,对姑息治疗持否定态度的人数有明显增加的趋势(p < 0.01)。医生是最反对安乐死的群体(80%),而助理护士是最积极的,13%的人反对安乐死合法化,33%的护士反对安乐死。不限成员名额的问题反映了对这一问题的复杂性和进一步讨论和教育的必要性的看法。结论:在瑞典,安乐死和医生协助自杀是非法的,超过三分之一的姑息治疗专业人员赞成将这些做法合法化,而四分之一的人尚未决定,这些比例在职业之间存在显著差异。此外,我们发现了进一步讨论和教育的重要需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
"Telehealth Allows for Flexibility and More Equity": Provider Perspectives on Telehealth for Outpatient Palliative Care for Underserved Patients. Grief and Bereavement in Pediatric Palliative Care #502. A Systematic Review of Grief Experiences of Children Who Have Lost a Sibling. Pancreatic Enzyme Supplementation for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer #500. Letter to the Editor: Error in Estimating Prevalence of Iatrogenic Opioid Use Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1