Evaluation of Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Two Different Calcium-based Silicate Indirect Pulp Capping Agents When Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin Restoration: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

Chhaya Patel, Megha Patel, Margi Panchal, Rohan Bhatt, Foram Patel, Disha Makwani
{"title":"Evaluation of Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Two Different Calcium-based Silicate Indirect Pulp Capping Agents When Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin Restoration: A Comparative <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Chhaya Patel, Megha Patel, Margi Panchal, Rohan Bhatt, Foram Patel, Disha Makwani","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect pulp therapy (IPT) is a conservative treatment approach that leaves the deepest caries adjacent to the pulp undisturbed in an effort to avoid pulp exposure. The result of IPT is primarily dependent on the biocompatibility, sealing capacity, adaptability of the overlying restoration to underlying dentin, and strength of the liner material utilized.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate (e-MTA) and biodentine when restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite resin after their initial set time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Around 40 extracted caries-free permanent molars were randomly divided into two groups according to the liner material used (group I (e-MTA) and group II-biodentine). Each group was further divided into subgroups A1, A2, B1, and B2, where A1 and B1 received GIC and A2 and B2 received composite resin restoration after the initial set time. Half of the samples from each subgroup were allotted to two test groups of SBS and microleakage evaluation. The SBS was evaluated using a universal testing machine, and microleakage was assessed using a dye penetration test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for intergroup comparison, and the paired sample <i>t</i>-test was used for intragroup comparison. Categorical data were analyzed using a nonparametric test at the 5% level of significance using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 for Windows.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.001) was found in SBS between the group (e-MTA) + composite and biodentine + composite, where the latter group showed the highest SBS. Microleakage was highest in the group (e-MTA) + GIC (0.6 ± 0.894) and lowest in the group biodentine + composite (0.2 ± 0.447). However, no statistically significant difference was found in microleakage among all four groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the constraints of this study, biodentine can be suggested as the pulp capping agent to be restored with composite resin restoration after its initial set time.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Patel C, Patel M, Panchal M, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Two Different Calcium-based Silicate Indirect Pulp Capping Agents When Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin Restoration: A Comparative <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(9):1035-1040.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 9","pages":"1035-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indirect pulp therapy (IPT) is a conservative treatment approach that leaves the deepest caries adjacent to the pulp undisturbed in an effort to avoid pulp exposure. The result of IPT is primarily dependent on the biocompatibility, sealing capacity, adaptability of the overlying restoration to underlying dentin, and strength of the liner material utilized.

Aim: To evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate (e-MTA) and biodentine when restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite resin after their initial set time.

Materials and methods: Around 40 extracted caries-free permanent molars were randomly divided into two groups according to the liner material used (group I (e-MTA) and group II-biodentine). Each group was further divided into subgroups A1, A2, B1, and B2, where A1 and B1 received GIC and A2 and B2 received composite resin restoration after the initial set time. Half of the samples from each subgroup were allotted to two test groups of SBS and microleakage evaluation. The SBS was evaluated using a universal testing machine, and microleakage was assessed using a dye penetration test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for intergroup comparison, and the paired sample t-test was used for intragroup comparison. Categorical data were analyzed using a nonparametric test at the 5% level of significance using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 for Windows.

Results: A statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) was found in SBS between the group (e-MTA) + composite and biodentine + composite, where the latter group showed the highest SBS. Microleakage was highest in the group (e-MTA) + GIC (0.6 ± 0.894) and lowest in the group biodentine + composite (0.2 ± 0.447). However, no statistically significant difference was found in microleakage among all four groups.

Conclusion: Within the constraints of this study, biodentine can be suggested as the pulp capping agent to be restored with composite resin restoration after its initial set time.

How to cite this article: Patel C, Patel M, Panchal M, et al. Evaluation of Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Two Different Calcium-based Silicate Indirect Pulp Capping Agents When Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin Restoration: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(9):1035-1040.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃离子水门铁和复合树脂修复两种不同钙基硅酸盐间接牙髓封盖剂的微渗漏和剪切强度评价:体外比较研究
背景:间接牙髓治疗(IPT)是一种保守的治疗方法,使牙髓附近最深的龋不受干扰,以避免牙髓暴露。IPT的效果主要取决于生物相容性、密封能力、复盖修复体对牙本质的适应性以及所使用的衬垫材料的强度。目的:评价三氧化矿物骨料(e-MTA)和生物牙本质在初始凝固时间后用玻璃离子水门铁(GIC)和复合树脂修复后的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和微泄漏。材料与方法:选取约40颗拔除的无龋恒磨牙,根据所使用的牙套材料随机分为I组(e-MTA)和ii组(bioentine)。每组进一步分为A1、A2、B1、B2亚组,其中A1、B1接受GIC治疗,A2、B2在初始设定时间后接受复合树脂修复。每个亚组各取一半样品分为SBS和微渗漏评价两组。使用通用试验机评估SBS,使用染料渗透测试评估微泄漏。组间比较采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA),组内比较采用配对样本t检验。分类数据分析使用非参数检验在5%的显著性水平,使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本21为Windows。结果:e-MTA +复合物组与生物牙汀+复合物组SBS差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001),其中生物牙汀+复合物组SBS最高。微渗漏以e-MTA + GIC组最高(0.6±0.894),生物牙汀+复方组最低(0.2±0.447)。但四组间微渗漏无统计学差异。结论:在本研究的限制条件下,生物牙本质可以作为牙髓封盖剂,在初始凝固时间后进行复合树脂修复。如何引用本文:Patel C, Patel M, Panchal M等。玻璃离子水门铁和复合树脂修复两种不同钙基硅酸盐间接牙髓封盖剂的微渗漏和剪切强度评价:体外比较研究中华临床儿科杂志;2017;17(9):1035-1040。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Digital Intraoral Scans Three-dimensional Surface Analysis Compared with Plaster Models Dental Measurement in Mixed Dentition. A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Modeling Videos on Dental Anxiety of 3-6-year-old Children Requiring Treatment under Local Anesthesia: A Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial. An In Vivo Comparative Analysis of Pain Perception in Children Following Lidocaine Gel, Clove Oil, and Precooling for Intraoral Injections: A Pilot Study. An In Vivo Evaluation of Changes in Salivary pH in 3-9-year-old Children Using Chewing Gums (Xylitol) and Lollipops (Xylitol + Erythritol). Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation between Conventional Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Gel-based Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Indirect Pulp Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1