Detangling experiences of agency in welfare technology use by home care recipients and their staff.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2435566
Samantha A Svärdh, Giana Carli Lorenzini, Anna Siverskog, Steven M Schmidt, Susanne Iwarsson, Sofi Fristedt
{"title":"Detangling experiences of agency in welfare technology use by home care recipients and their staff.","authors":"Samantha A Svärdh, Giana Carli Lorenzini, Anna Siverskog, Steven M Schmidt, Susanne Iwarsson, Sofi Fristedt","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2435566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Welfare technology (WT), defined as digital technology enabling individuals to live securely, actively and independently at home, is often viewed as a solution to care resource shortages. This solution discourse has increasingly been problematised, and ethical issues specifically connected to WT have emerged, e.g., regarding quality of care. The existing array of WT is developed with limited user involvement; primary user perspectives are thus inadequately voiced in research. This study aimed to disentangle how older adults and their homecare staff experience and influence WT use in homecare situations. The qualitative approach encompassed individual semi-structured interviews with homecare staff (<i>n</i> = 26) and older adults (<i>n</i> = 26) receiving homecare as well as utilising WT. Interviews were conducted in five Swedish municipalities, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Three main themes were developed: (1) <i>Lack of agency in WT obtainment,</i> in which a lack of influence in the receiving of WT is illustrated. (2) <i>Contradictory user perspectives regarding WT and agency</i>, in which staffs' perceptions of specific WT are contrasted to older adults', highlighting how WT perceived positively by staff often detract from older adults' agency. (3) <i>Agency and WT use inextricably linked with time</i>, in which it is illustrated how influence over time is intricately connected to experienced agency in WT use. Our findings demonstrate a problematic lack of agency in WT use. Further improvements to current WT, aided by stronger user involvement, as well as certain municipal routines, are necessary if user agency is to be strengthened in relation to WT use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2435566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Welfare technology (WT), defined as digital technology enabling individuals to live securely, actively and independently at home, is often viewed as a solution to care resource shortages. This solution discourse has increasingly been problematised, and ethical issues specifically connected to WT have emerged, e.g., regarding quality of care. The existing array of WT is developed with limited user involvement; primary user perspectives are thus inadequately voiced in research. This study aimed to disentangle how older adults and their homecare staff experience and influence WT use in homecare situations. The qualitative approach encompassed individual semi-structured interviews with homecare staff (n = 26) and older adults (n = 26) receiving homecare as well as utilising WT. Interviews were conducted in five Swedish municipalities, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Three main themes were developed: (1) Lack of agency in WT obtainment, in which a lack of influence in the receiving of WT is illustrated. (2) Contradictory user perspectives regarding WT and agency, in which staffs' perceptions of specific WT are contrasted to older adults', highlighting how WT perceived positively by staff often detract from older adults' agency. (3) Agency and WT use inextricably linked with time, in which it is illustrated how influence over time is intricately connected to experienced agency in WT use. Our findings demonstrate a problematic lack of agency in WT use. Further improvements to current WT, aided by stronger user involvement, as well as certain municipal routines, are necessary if user agency is to be strengthened in relation to WT use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整理机构在家庭护理受助人及其工作人员使用福利技术方面的经验。
福利技术(WT)被定义为数字技术,使个人能够在家中安全,积极和独立地生活,通常被视为护理资源短缺的解决方案。这种解决方案的论述越来越成问题,特别是与WT相关的伦理问题已经出现,例如,关于护理质量。现有的小波变换阵列是在用户参与有限的情况下开发的;因此,在研究中没有充分表达主要用户的观点。本研究旨在厘清老年人和他们的家庭护理人员在家庭护理情况下如何体验和影响WT的使用。定性方法包括与家庭护理人员(n = 26)和接受家庭护理的老年人(n = 26)进行的个人半结构化访谈,以及利用WT。访谈在五个瑞典城市进行,逐字记录并使用主题分析进行分析。本文发展了三个主要主题:(1)在获得小波变换方面缺乏代理,其中说明了在接受小波变换方面缺乏影响力。(2)关于WT和代理的矛盾的用户观点,其中员工对特定WT的感知与老年人形成对比,突出了员工对WT的积极感知往往会减损老年人的代理。(3)代理和WT的使用与时间有着千丝万缕的联系,其中说明了随着时间的推移,影响力如何与WT使用中经验丰富的代理复杂地联系在一起。我们的研究结果表明,在WT的使用中缺乏代理是有问题的。如果要加强用户代理在WT使用方面的作用,就必须在更强的用户参与以及某些市政惯例的帮助下进一步改进当前的WT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of factors affecting axle load and friction forces in a wheelchair. Tools and devices for telerehabilitation in pediatric and adult cystic fibrosis patients: a scoping review. Design priorities for an at-home upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot. Bridging gaps in technology adoption for disabilities. Estimating power wheelchair electronics lifespan based on real-world data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1