A Phoneme-Scale Assessment of Multichannel Speech Enhancement Algorithms.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Trends in Hearing Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23312165241292205
Nasser-Eddine Monir, Paul Magron, Romain Serizel
{"title":"A Phoneme-Scale Assessment of Multichannel Speech Enhancement Algorithms.","authors":"Nasser-Eddine Monir, Paul Magron, Romain Serizel","doi":"10.1177/23312165241292205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the intricate acoustic landscapes where speech intelligibility is challenged by noise and reverberation, multichannel speech enhancement emerges as a promising solution for individuals with hearing loss. Such algorithms are commonly evaluated at the utterance scale. However, this approach overlooks the granular acoustic nuances revealed by phoneme-specific analysis, potentially obscuring key insights into their performance. This paper presents an in-depth phoneme-scale evaluation of three state-of-the-art multichannel speech enhancement algorithms. These algorithms-filter-and-sum network, minimum variance distortionless response, and Tango-are here extensively evaluated across different noise conditions and spatial setups, employing realistic acoustic simulations with measured room impulse responses, and leveraging diversity offered by multiple microphones in a binaural hearing setup. The study emphasizes the fine-grained phoneme-scale analysis, revealing that while some phonemes like plosives are heavily impacted by environmental acoustics and challenging to deal with by the algorithms, others like nasals and sibilants see substantial improvements after enhancement. These investigations demonstrate important improvements in phoneme clarity in noisy conditions, with insights that could drive the development of more personalized and phoneme-aware hearing aid technologies. Additionally, while this study provides extensive data on the physical metrics of processed speech, these physical metrics do not necessarily imitate human perceptions of speech, and the impact of the findings presented would have to be investigated through listening tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":"28 ","pages":"23312165241292205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165241292205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the intricate acoustic landscapes where speech intelligibility is challenged by noise and reverberation, multichannel speech enhancement emerges as a promising solution for individuals with hearing loss. Such algorithms are commonly evaluated at the utterance scale. However, this approach overlooks the granular acoustic nuances revealed by phoneme-specific analysis, potentially obscuring key insights into their performance. This paper presents an in-depth phoneme-scale evaluation of three state-of-the-art multichannel speech enhancement algorithms. These algorithms-filter-and-sum network, minimum variance distortionless response, and Tango-are here extensively evaluated across different noise conditions and spatial setups, employing realistic acoustic simulations with measured room impulse responses, and leveraging diversity offered by multiple microphones in a binaural hearing setup. The study emphasizes the fine-grained phoneme-scale analysis, revealing that while some phonemes like plosives are heavily impacted by environmental acoustics and challenging to deal with by the algorithms, others like nasals and sibilants see substantial improvements after enhancement. These investigations demonstrate important improvements in phoneme clarity in noisy conditions, with insights that could drive the development of more personalized and phoneme-aware hearing aid technologies. Additionally, while this study provides extensive data on the physical metrics of processed speech, these physical metrics do not necessarily imitate human perceptions of speech, and the impact of the findings presented would have to be investigated through listening tests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Hearing
Trends in Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation to Noise in Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Word Recognition On the Feasibility of Using Behavioral Listening Effort Test Methods to Evaluate Auditory Performance in Cochlear Implant Users Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users (Why) Do Transparent Hearing Devices Impair Speech Perception in Collocated Noise? Remixing Preferences for Western Instrumental Classical Music of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1