Initial Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Messaging Source Influences Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Older Adults: A Quantitative Survey of Older Adults in Columbus, Ohio.

Nathaniel Albright, Dianne Morrison-Beedy, Ethan Morgan
{"title":"Initial Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Messaging Source Influences Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Older Adults: A Quantitative Survey of Older Adults in Columbus, Ohio.","authors":"Nathaniel Albright, Dianne Morrison-Beedy, Ethan Morgan","doi":"10.1097/JNC.0000000000000512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Older adults account for one in every five new HIV infections in the United States yet are often overlooked in tailored pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) messaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the original PrEP messaging source and its influence on PrEP use among a cohort of older adults. The Columbus Health Aging Project data (N = 794) were used to examine the initial PrEP information source and PrEP use in the past 6 months, adjusting for demographics and sexually transmitted infection (STI) status. Forty-six percent reported an STI, and 11.5% used PrEP. The main sources of PrEP information were peers (42.2%) and health care providers (40.2%); media (17.6%) sources were less common. Compared with those who received PrEP information from their health care provider, those informed by peers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.99) or media (aOR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07-0.42) were less likely to use PrEP. Adjusting for STI-, media-informed remained less likely to have used PrEP compared with those informed by providers (aOR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.55-2.35). These findings highlight the importance of tailored PrEP messaging for older adults for Ending the HIV Epidemic efforts. Media appears less impactful as a messaging approach for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":50263,"journal":{"name":"Janac-Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Janac-Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNC.0000000000000512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Older adults account for one in every five new HIV infections in the United States yet are often overlooked in tailored pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) messaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the original PrEP messaging source and its influence on PrEP use among a cohort of older adults. The Columbus Health Aging Project data (N = 794) were used to examine the initial PrEP information source and PrEP use in the past 6 months, adjusting for demographics and sexually transmitted infection (STI) status. Forty-six percent reported an STI, and 11.5% used PrEP. The main sources of PrEP information were peers (42.2%) and health care providers (40.2%); media (17.6%) sources were less common. Compared with those who received PrEP information from their health care provider, those informed by peers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.99) or media (aOR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07-0.42) were less likely to use PrEP. Adjusting for STI-, media-informed remained less likely to have used PrEP compared with those informed by providers (aOR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.55-2.35). These findings highlight the importance of tailored PrEP messaging for older adults for Ending the HIV Epidemic efforts. Media appears less impactful as a messaging approach for older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初始暴露前预防信息来源影响暴露前预防在老年人中的使用:俄亥俄州哥伦布市老年人的定量调查。
摘要:在美国,每5例新发HIV感染中就有1例是老年人,但在针对性的暴露前预防(PrEP)信息传递中,老年人往往被忽视。本研究的目的是评估PrEP的原始信息来源及其对老年人PrEP使用的影响。采用哥伦布健康老龄化项目数据(N = 794)检查PrEP初始信息源和过去6个月的PrEP使用情况,调整人口统计学和性传播感染(STI)状况。46%的人报告了性传播感染,11.5%的人使用了PrEP。PrEP信息的主要来源是同伴(42.2%)和卫生保健提供者(40.2%);媒体来源(17.6%)较少。与从卫生保健提供者处获得PrEP信息的人相比,由同伴告知的人(调整优势比[aOR] = 0.58;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.34-0.99)或介质(aOR = 0.17;95% CI: 0.07-0.42)使用PrEP的可能性较低。调整STI后,与由提供者告知的相比,媒体告知的使用PrEP的可能性仍较低(aOR = 1.14;95% ci: 0.55-2.35)。这些发现强调了为老年人量身定制PrEP信息传递对于结束艾滋病毒流行工作的重要性。媒体作为一种传递信息的方式对老年人的影响似乎较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care (JANAC) is a peer-reviewed, international nursing journal that covers the full spectrum of the global HIV epidemic, focusing on prevention, evidence-based care management, interprofessional clinical care, research, advocacy, policy, education, social determinants of health, epidemiology, and program development. JANAC functions according to the highest standards of ethical publishing practices and offers innovative publication options, including Open Access and prepublication article posting, where the journal can post articles before they are published with an issue.
期刊最新文献
Influences of Gender-Based Stigma on HIV Prevention and Care Among Older Women: A Scoping Review. Development of a Locator Tool and Protocol to Support People Living With HIV in Baltimore: A Quality Improvement Project. "I'm So Passive, Every Visit Is a Challenge": Stigma Experienced by Older People Living With HIV During Follow-up Health Care Visits in Wuxi, China-A Qualitative Study. Experiences of Young Women Living in Kibra, Kenya, on HIV Risk and Sexual Violence: A Descriptive Study. "They Want to Take Care of Themselves to Take Care of Their Kids": Provider Focus Group Perspectives of Stress and Resilience in Parents Living With HIV and Their Children in the Southeast United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1