Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)
A. Bauer , H. Sturm , P. Martus , B. Brüggenjürgen , H. Eberhardt , E. Mayer , R. Schulz , J. Bernhold , T. Krause , P. Höllein , J. Liese , S. Wolf , S. Joos , M. Grünewald , STAUfrei Consortium
{"title":"Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)","authors":"A. Bauer , H. Sturm , P. Martus , B. Brüggenjürgen , H. Eberhardt , E. Mayer , R. Schulz , J. Bernhold , T. Krause , P. Höllein , J. Liese , S. Wolf , S. Joos , M. Grünewald , STAUfrei Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. This study aimed to shift the process of screening and decontamination of <em>S</em>. <em>aureus</em> [meticillin-resistant <em>S. aureus</em> (MRSA) and meticillin-susceptible <em>S. aureus</em> (MSSA)] out of the hospital setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between April 2019 and March 2022, 8054 (intervention group <em>N</em>=3390, control group 4664) patients (age >18 years) undergoing elective procedures in a hospital in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) were recruited for the study. The intervention consisted of 5 days of decontamination carried out by patients (or their caregivers) in their domestic environment. The analysis comprised a simple arm comparison of colonization rates at admission between study groups, as well as adjusted logistic regressions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After adjustment for relevant risk factors, the intervention reduced the risk of <em>S</em>. <em>aureus</em> colonization at admission by 14%; this difference was significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.10; <em>P</em>=0.046). Re-admission was significantly less common in the intervention group. Signs of wound infection and recolonization after invasive procedures did not differ significantly between the study groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Outpatient decontamination measures appear to be more effective compared with routine care. As the results from logistic regressions are based on MSSA, its consideration in clinical hygiene management should be discussed. Strict adherence during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was challenging, potentially underestimating the overall impact of the intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"157 ","pages":"Pages 19-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124004018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Staphylococcus aureus colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. This study aimed to shift the process of screening and decontamination of S. aureus [meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)] out of the hospital setting.
Methods
Between April 2019 and March 2022, 8054 (intervention group N=3390, control group 4664) patients (age >18 years) undergoing elective procedures in a hospital in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) were recruited for the study. The intervention consisted of 5 days of decontamination carried out by patients (or their caregivers) in their domestic environment. The analysis comprised a simple arm comparison of colonization rates at admission between study groups, as well as adjusted logistic regressions.
Results
After adjustment for relevant risk factors, the intervention reduced the risk of S. aureus colonization at admission by 14%; this difference was significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.10; P=0.046). Re-admission was significantly less common in the intervention group. Signs of wound infection and recolonization after invasive procedures did not differ significantly between the study groups.
Conclusions
Outpatient decontamination measures appear to be more effective compared with routine care. As the results from logistic regressions are based on MSSA, its consideration in clinical hygiene management should be discussed. Strict adherence during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was challenging, potentially underestimating the overall impact of the intervention.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.