Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Hospital Infection Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.12.001
A. Bauer , H. Sturm , P. Martus , B. Brüggenjürgen , H. Eberhardt , E. Mayer , R. Schulz , J. Bernhold , T. Krause , P. Höllein , J. Liese , S. Wolf , S. Joos , M. Grünewald , STAUfrei Consortium
{"title":"Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)","authors":"A. Bauer ,&nbsp;H. Sturm ,&nbsp;P. Martus ,&nbsp;B. Brüggenjürgen ,&nbsp;H. Eberhardt ,&nbsp;E. Mayer ,&nbsp;R. Schulz ,&nbsp;J. Bernhold ,&nbsp;T. Krause ,&nbsp;P. Höllein ,&nbsp;J. Liese ,&nbsp;S. Wolf ,&nbsp;S. Joos ,&nbsp;M. Grünewald ,&nbsp;STAUfrei Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. This study aimed to shift the process of screening and decontamination of <em>S</em>. <em>aureus</em> [meticillin-resistant <em>S. aureus</em> (MRSA) and meticillin-susceptible <em>S. aureus</em> (MSSA)] out of the hospital setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between April 2019 and March 2022, 8054 (intervention group <em>N</em>=3390, control group 4664) patients (age &gt;18 years) undergoing elective procedures in a hospital in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) were recruited for the study. The intervention consisted of 5 days of decontamination carried out by patients (or their caregivers) in their domestic environment. The analysis comprised a simple arm comparison of colonization rates at admission between study groups, as well as adjusted logistic regressions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After adjustment for relevant risk factors, the intervention reduced the risk of <em>S</em>. <em>aureus</em> colonization at admission by 14%; this difference was significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.10; <em>P</em>=0.046). Re-admission was significantly less common in the intervention group. Signs of wound infection and recolonization after invasive procedures did not differ significantly between the study groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Outpatient decontamination measures appear to be more effective compared with routine care. As the results from logistic regressions are based on MSSA, its consideration in clinical hygiene management should be discussed. Strict adherence during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was challenging, potentially underestimating the overall impact of the intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"157 ","pages":"Pages 19-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124004018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Staphylococcus aureus colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. This study aimed to shift the process of screening and decontamination of S. aureus [meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)] out of the hospital setting.

Methods

Between April 2019 and March 2022, 8054 (intervention group N=3390, control group 4664) patients (age >18 years) undergoing elective procedures in a hospital in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) were recruited for the study. The intervention consisted of 5 days of decontamination carried out by patients (or their caregivers) in their domestic environment. The analysis comprised a simple arm comparison of colonization rates at admission between study groups, as well as adjusted logistic regressions.

Results

After adjustment for relevant risk factors, the intervention reduced the risk of S. aureus colonization at admission by 14%; this difference was significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.10; P=0.046). Re-admission was significantly less common in the intervention group. Signs of wound infection and recolonization after invasive procedures did not differ significantly between the study groups.

Conclusions

Outpatient decontamination measures appear to be more effective compared with routine care. As the results from logistic regressions are based on MSSA, its consideration in clinical hygiene management should be discussed. Strict adherence during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was challenging, potentially underestimating the overall impact of the intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊进行的筛查和去污程序能否减少金黄色葡萄球菌的定植并减轻选择性医院手术患者的相关并发症?对照干预研究(STAUfrei)。
背景:外科手术中金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)定殖增加伤口感染的风险。迄今为止,预防战略主要集中在医院,尽管有建议在家中进行院前消毒,这可以由患者自己进行。目前的研究旨在将SA(耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA))的筛选和净化过程转移到医院环境之外。方法:在2019年4月至2022年3月期间,在德国巴登-符腾堡州一家医院接受选择性手术的N=8054例(干预组=3390例)患者(bb0 - 18岁)纳入研究。干预包括由患者(或其护理人员)在其家庭环境中进行为期5天的净化。该分析包括对研究组入院时的定植率进行简单的对照比较以及调整后的逻辑回归。结果:调整相关危险因素后,干预使入院时SA定植的风险降低了14%,具有统计学意义(优势比:0.86 (95% CI: 0.74-0.10;p = 0.046)。干预组再次住院的频率也显著降低。有创手术后伤口感染和再定植的迹象在研究组之间没有显著差异。结论:与常规护理相比,门诊消毒措施更有效。由于logistic回归的结果是基于甲氧西林敏感SA (MSSA),在临床卫生管理中应考虑到它。大流行期间的严格遵守具有挑战性,可能低估了干预措施的总体影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
期刊最新文献
Drain decontamination using in-situ generated ozone. Factors associated with core competencies of infection prevention and control practitioners in 511 hospitals: A large cross-sectional survey in Guizhou in southwest China. Prognosis analysis and infection-related risk factors of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from a general hospital in China, 2019-2023. Survey of healthcare-associated sink infrastructure, and sink trap antibiotic residues and biochemistry, in 29 UK hospitals. Optimization and evaluation of new decontamination procedures inactivating human prions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1