Cross-Programmatic Efficiency: The System is Greater Than the Sum of Its Programs.

Health systems and reform Pub Date : 2024-12-18 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2024.2427715
Susan P Sparkes, Alexandra J Earle, Joseph Kutzin
{"title":"Cross-Programmatic Efficiency: The System is Greater Than the Sum of Its Programs.","authors":"Susan P Sparkes, Alexandra J Earle, Joseph Kutzin","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2024.2427715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health programs play important roles in health systems, contributing to the development of best practices, guidelines, awareness, and advocacy for specific services, populations, or conditions. However, a person's health is not defined by single conditions or interventions and therefore cannot be fully catered to by only one program. Additionally, the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) index has stagnated in recent years, even for programmatic outcomes heavily supported by external assistance, raising concerns about the efficiency and sustainability of many programs and their objectives. The World Health Organization's cross-programmatic efficiency analysis (CPEA) approach provides a way to assess programs with a system-wide perspective. CPEA is an approach for analyzing programs based on health system functions and considers how the entire system, including programs, aligns to meet objectives. It focuses on identifying areas of duplication or misalignment as targets for reforms. This policy report summarizes findings from CPEA analyses conducted by six countries (Bhutan, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania) between 2017 and 2021. The cases demonstrate the extent and areas of duplication across programs, including information systems, health workforce, and supply chains. Duplications and misalignments in the generation of human and physical resources (subsequently referred to as \"inputs\") are often driven by how health programs are financed and governed. These inefficiencies directly impact how people receive health services. Comparing CPEA findings from multiple countries demonstrates that using the whole health system as the unit of analysis is critical when seeking to increase system efficiency and align available resources to meet UHC objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"10 3","pages":"2427715"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2427715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health programs play important roles in health systems, contributing to the development of best practices, guidelines, awareness, and advocacy for specific services, populations, or conditions. However, a person's health is not defined by single conditions or interventions and therefore cannot be fully catered to by only one program. Additionally, the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) index has stagnated in recent years, even for programmatic outcomes heavily supported by external assistance, raising concerns about the efficiency and sustainability of many programs and their objectives. The World Health Organization's cross-programmatic efficiency analysis (CPEA) approach provides a way to assess programs with a system-wide perspective. CPEA is an approach for analyzing programs based on health system functions and considers how the entire system, including programs, aligns to meet objectives. It focuses on identifying areas of duplication or misalignment as targets for reforms. This policy report summarizes findings from CPEA analyses conducted by six countries (Bhutan, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania) between 2017 and 2021. The cases demonstrate the extent and areas of duplication across programs, including information systems, health workforce, and supply chains. Duplications and misalignments in the generation of human and physical resources (subsequently referred to as "inputs") are often driven by how health programs are financed and governed. These inefficiencies directly impact how people receive health services. Comparing CPEA findings from multiple countries demonstrates that using the whole health system as the unit of analysis is critical when seeking to increase system efficiency and align available resources to meet UHC objectives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨程序效率:系统大于其程序的总和。
卫生规划在卫生系统中发挥着重要作用,有助于制定针对特定服务、人群或疾病的最佳做法、指南、认识和宣传。然而,一个人的健康不是由单一的条件或干预措施来定义的,因此不能仅由一个方案来完全满足。此外,全民健康覆盖(UHC)指数近年来停滞不前,即使在得到外部援助大力支持的规划成果方面也是如此,这引起了人们对许多规划及其目标的效率和可持续性的担忧。世界卫生组织的跨规划效率分析(CPEA)方法提供了一种从全系统角度评估规划的方法。CPEA是一种基于卫生系统功能分析项目的方法,并考虑整个系统(包括项目)如何协调一致以实现目标。它侧重于确定重复或不一致的领域作为改革目标。本政策报告总结了2017年至2021年间六个国家(不丹、加纳、肯尼亚、南非、斯里兰卡和坦桑尼亚)进行的CPEA分析的结果。这些案例表明了各规划之间存在重复的程度和领域,包括信息系统、卫生人力和供应链。人力和物质资源(随后称为“投入”)产生的重复和错位往往是由卫生规划的融资和管理方式驱动的。这些效率低下直接影响人们获得卫生服务的方式。比较来自多个国家的CPEA结果表明,在寻求提高系统效率和调整现有资源以实现全民健康覆盖目标时,将整个卫生系统作为分析单位至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient and Effective Diabetes Care in the Era of Digitalization and Hypercompetitive Research Culture: A Focused Review in the Western Pacific Region with Malaysia as a Case Study. How Health Systems World-wide Fail Type 2 Diabetics. Does Public Financial Management Save Life? Evidence from a Quantitative Review of PFM and Health Outcomes in Sub-Saharan African Countries. COVID-19 Deaths in Long-Term Care Facilities in the US: An Urgent Call for Equitable and Integrated Health Systems and an All-Hazards Approach to the Next Crisis. Resilience of Primary Health Care in Ukraine: Challenges of the Pandemic and War.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1