Intrinsic and environmental drivers of pairwise cohesion in wild Canis social groups

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4492
John F. Benson, David A. Keiter, Peter J. Mahoney, Benjamin L. Allen, Lee Allen, Francisco Álvares, Morgan L. Anderson, Shannon M. Barber-Meyer, Adi Barocas, James C. Beasley, Linda Behrendorff, Jerrold L. Belant, Dean E. Beyer Jr, Luigi Boitani, Bridget L. Borg, Stan Boutin, Erin E. Boydston, Justin L. Brown, Joseph K. Bump, Jonathon D. Cepek, Michael J. Chamberlain, Yvette M. Chenaux-Ibrahim, Seth G. Cherry, Duško Ćirović, Paolo Ciucci, H. Dean Cluff, Susan M. Cooper, Kevin R. Crooks, Daniel L. J. Dupont, Robert N. Fisher, Daniel Fortin, Thomas D. Gable, Emilio García, Eli Geffen, Stanley D. Gehrt, Michael Gillingham, Douglas C. Heard, Mark Hebblewhite, Joseph W. Hinton, Austin T. Homkes, Chris G. Howden, Djuro Huber, Pat J. Jackson, Kyle Joly, Allicia Kelly, Marcella J. Kelly, Katrien A. Kingdon, Abhijeet Kulkarni, Josip Kusak, Gerald W. Kuzyk, Bryce C. Lake, Luis Llaneza, José Vicente López-Bao, Daniel R. MacNulty, Ashley A. D. McLaren, Philip D. McLoughlin, Evelyn H. Merrill, Kenneth J. Mills, Numi Mitchell, Seth A. Moore, Matthew A. Mumma, Maureen H. Murray, Marco Musiani, Mónia Nakamura, Eric W. Neilson, Lalenia M. Neufeld, Thomas M. Newsome, John K. Oakleaf, Vicente Palacios, Marlo M. Perdicas, Thomas Perry, Tyler R. Petroelje, Cyrenea B. Piper, Christina M. Prokopenko, Laura R. Prugh, Seth P. D. Riley, Helena Rio-Maior, Gretchen H. Roffler, Dale Rollins, Håkan Sand, Fiona K. A. Schmiegelow, Dale R. Seip, Mathew S. Sorum, Colleen C. St. Clair, Robin Steenweg, Michael W. Strohbach, Jack Tatler, Maria Thaker, Connor A. Thompson, Julie W. Turner, Abi T. Vanak, Eric Vander Wal, Petter Wabakken, Scott E. Walter, Sarah C. Webster, Tyler J. Wheeldon, Camilla Wikenros, Steve K. Windels, Julie K. Young, Sana Zabihi-Seissan, Barbara Zimmermann, Brent R. Patterson
{"title":"Intrinsic and environmental drivers of pairwise cohesion in wild Canis social groups","authors":"John F. Benson,&nbsp;David A. Keiter,&nbsp;Peter J. Mahoney,&nbsp;Benjamin L. Allen,&nbsp;Lee Allen,&nbsp;Francisco Álvares,&nbsp;Morgan L. Anderson,&nbsp;Shannon M. Barber-Meyer,&nbsp;Adi Barocas,&nbsp;James C. Beasley,&nbsp;Linda Behrendorff,&nbsp;Jerrold L. Belant,&nbsp;Dean E. Beyer Jr,&nbsp;Luigi Boitani,&nbsp;Bridget L. Borg,&nbsp;Stan Boutin,&nbsp;Erin E. Boydston,&nbsp;Justin L. Brown,&nbsp;Joseph K. Bump,&nbsp;Jonathon D. Cepek,&nbsp;Michael J. Chamberlain,&nbsp;Yvette M. Chenaux-Ibrahim,&nbsp;Seth G. Cherry,&nbsp;Duško Ćirović,&nbsp;Paolo Ciucci,&nbsp;H. Dean Cluff,&nbsp;Susan M. Cooper,&nbsp;Kevin R. Crooks,&nbsp;Daniel L. J. Dupont,&nbsp;Robert N. Fisher,&nbsp;Daniel Fortin,&nbsp;Thomas D. Gable,&nbsp;Emilio García,&nbsp;Eli Geffen,&nbsp;Stanley D. Gehrt,&nbsp;Michael Gillingham,&nbsp;Douglas C. Heard,&nbsp;Mark Hebblewhite,&nbsp;Joseph W. Hinton,&nbsp;Austin T. Homkes,&nbsp;Chris G. Howden,&nbsp;Djuro Huber,&nbsp;Pat J. Jackson,&nbsp;Kyle Joly,&nbsp;Allicia Kelly,&nbsp;Marcella J. Kelly,&nbsp;Katrien A. Kingdon,&nbsp;Abhijeet Kulkarni,&nbsp;Josip Kusak,&nbsp;Gerald W. Kuzyk,&nbsp;Bryce C. Lake,&nbsp;Luis Llaneza,&nbsp;José Vicente López-Bao,&nbsp;Daniel R. MacNulty,&nbsp;Ashley A. D. McLaren,&nbsp;Philip D. McLoughlin,&nbsp;Evelyn H. Merrill,&nbsp;Kenneth J. Mills,&nbsp;Numi Mitchell,&nbsp;Seth A. Moore,&nbsp;Matthew A. Mumma,&nbsp;Maureen H. Murray,&nbsp;Marco Musiani,&nbsp;Mónia Nakamura,&nbsp;Eric W. Neilson,&nbsp;Lalenia M. Neufeld,&nbsp;Thomas M. Newsome,&nbsp;John K. Oakleaf,&nbsp;Vicente Palacios,&nbsp;Marlo M. Perdicas,&nbsp;Thomas Perry,&nbsp;Tyler R. Petroelje,&nbsp;Cyrenea B. Piper,&nbsp;Christina M. Prokopenko,&nbsp;Laura R. Prugh,&nbsp;Seth P. D. Riley,&nbsp;Helena Rio-Maior,&nbsp;Gretchen H. Roffler,&nbsp;Dale Rollins,&nbsp;Håkan Sand,&nbsp;Fiona K. A. Schmiegelow,&nbsp;Dale R. Seip,&nbsp;Mathew S. Sorum,&nbsp;Colleen C. St. Clair,&nbsp;Robin Steenweg,&nbsp;Michael W. Strohbach,&nbsp;Jack Tatler,&nbsp;Maria Thaker,&nbsp;Connor A. Thompson,&nbsp;Julie W. Turner,&nbsp;Abi T. Vanak,&nbsp;Eric Vander Wal,&nbsp;Petter Wabakken,&nbsp;Scott E. Walter,&nbsp;Sarah C. Webster,&nbsp;Tyler J. Wheeldon,&nbsp;Camilla Wikenros,&nbsp;Steve K. Windels,&nbsp;Julie K. Young,&nbsp;Sana Zabihi-Seissan,&nbsp;Barbara Zimmermann,&nbsp;Brent R. Patterson","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animals within social groups respond to costs and benefits of sociality by adjusting the proportion of time they spend in close proximity to other individuals in the group (cohesion). Variation in cohesion between individuals, in turn, shapes important group-level processes such as subgroup formation and fission–fusion dynamics. Although critical to animal sociality, a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing cohesion remains a gap in our knowledge of cooperative behavior in animals. We tracked 574 individuals from six species within the genus <i>Canis</i> in 15 countries on four continents with GPS telemetry to estimate the time that pairs of individuals within social groups spent in close proximity and test hypotheses regarding drivers of cohesion. Pairs of social canids (<i>Canis</i> spp.) varied widely in the proportion of time they spent together (5%–100%) during seasonal monitoring periods relative to both intrinsic characteristics and environmental conditions. The majority of our data came from three species of wolves (gray wolves, eastern wolves, and red wolves) and coyotes. For these species, cohesion within social groups was greatest between breeding pairs and varied seasonally as the nature of cooperative activities changed relative to annual life history patterns. Across species, wolves were more cohesive than coyotes. For wolves, pairs were less cohesive in larger groups, and when suitable, small prey was present reflecting the constraints of food resources and intragroup competition on social associations. Pair cohesion in wolves declined with increased anthropogenic modification of the landscape and greater climatic variability, underscoring challenges for conserving social top predators in a changing world. We show that pairwise cohesion in social groups varies strongly both within and across <i>Canis</i> species, as individuals respond to changing ecological context defined by resources, competition, and anthropogenic disturbance. Our work highlights that cohesion is a highly plastic component of animal sociality that holds significant promise for elucidating ecological and evolutionary mechanisms underlying cooperative behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals within social groups respond to costs and benefits of sociality by adjusting the proportion of time they spend in close proximity to other individuals in the group (cohesion). Variation in cohesion between individuals, in turn, shapes important group-level processes such as subgroup formation and fission–fusion dynamics. Although critical to animal sociality, a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing cohesion remains a gap in our knowledge of cooperative behavior in animals. We tracked 574 individuals from six species within the genus Canis in 15 countries on four continents with GPS telemetry to estimate the time that pairs of individuals within social groups spent in close proximity and test hypotheses regarding drivers of cohesion. Pairs of social canids (Canis spp.) varied widely in the proportion of time they spent together (5%–100%) during seasonal monitoring periods relative to both intrinsic characteristics and environmental conditions. The majority of our data came from three species of wolves (gray wolves, eastern wolves, and red wolves) and coyotes. For these species, cohesion within social groups was greatest between breeding pairs and varied seasonally as the nature of cooperative activities changed relative to annual life history patterns. Across species, wolves were more cohesive than coyotes. For wolves, pairs were less cohesive in larger groups, and when suitable, small prey was present reflecting the constraints of food resources and intragroup competition on social associations. Pair cohesion in wolves declined with increased anthropogenic modification of the landscape and greater climatic variability, underscoring challenges for conserving social top predators in a changing world. We show that pairwise cohesion in social groups varies strongly both within and across Canis species, as individuals respond to changing ecological context defined by resources, competition, and anthropogenic disturbance. Our work highlights that cohesion is a highly plastic component of animal sociality that holds significant promise for elucidating ecological and evolutionary mechanisms underlying cooperative behavior.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生犬类社会群体两两凝聚力的内在和环境驱动因素。
社会群体中的动物通过调整与群体中其他个体接近的时间比例(凝聚力)来应对社会性的成本和收益。反过来,个体间凝聚力的变化也会影响重要的群体层面的过程,如亚群体的形成和裂变-融合动力学。尽管凝聚力对动物的社会性至关重要,但全面了解影响凝聚力的因素仍然是我们对动物合作行为认识的一个空白。我们利用全球定位系统遥测技术追踪了来自四大洲 15 个国家犬科动物属中 6 个物种的 574 个个体,以估算社会群体中成对个体相互接近的时间,并检验有关凝聚力驱动因素的假设。在季节性监测期间,社会性犬科动物(Canis spp.)的成对个体在一起的时间比例(5%-100%)因内在特征和环境条件的不同而有很大差异。我们的大部分数据来自三种狼(灰狼、东部狼和红狼)和郊狼。对于这些物种来说,社会群体内部的凝聚力在繁殖对之间最强,并且随着合作活动的性质相对于年度生活史模式的变化而随季节变化。在所有物种中,狼比郊狼更有凝聚力。对于狼来说,在较大的群体中,狼对的凝聚力较低,当有合适的小型猎物存在时,狼对的凝聚力较高,这反映了食物资源和群体内竞争对社会联合的限制。狼的成对凝聚力随着人类对地貌的改造和气候变异的增加而下降,这凸显了在不断变化的世界中保护社会性顶级食肉动物所面临的挑战。我们的研究表明,随着个体对由资源、竞争和人为干扰所决定的不断变化的生态环境做出反应,社会群体中的成对凝聚力在犬科动物物种内部和物种之间都存在很大差异。我们的研究突出表明,凝聚力是动物社会性中可塑性极强的组成部分,对于阐明合作行为背后的生态和进化机制具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Image Mean plant toxicity modulates the effects of plant defense variability Lack of successful sexual reproduction suggests the irreversible parthenogenesis in a stick insect Erratum to “Poor relationships between NEON airborne observation platform data and field-based vegetation traits at a mesic grassland”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1