Patient and provider experiences with opioid use disorder care delivered via telehealth: A systematic mixed-studies review

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Drug and alcohol dependence Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112522
Shoshana V. Aronowitz , Naomi Zucker , Morgan Thompson , Richard James , Justin Clapp , David Mandell
{"title":"Patient and provider experiences with opioid use disorder care delivered via telehealth: A systematic mixed-studies review","authors":"Shoshana V. Aronowitz ,&nbsp;Naomi Zucker ,&nbsp;Morgan Thompson ,&nbsp;Richard James ,&nbsp;Justin Clapp ,&nbsp;David Mandell","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and loosening of some opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment regulations in the U.S. and Canada, there has been a rapid rise in the use of telehealth for buprenorphine induction, maintenance, and counseling (tele-bupe). Previous reviews highlight that tele-bupe can expand access to OUD care and improve treatment retention, but none to date have synthesized patient and clinician experiences with and perceptions of this care.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This review synthesized findings from quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies that examined patient and provider experiences with tele-bupe. We assessed the perceived effectiveness and acceptability of this treatment modality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. In July 2023, we searched six databases using keywords ‘telehealth AND opioid use disorder’ (and related terms) for papers published in English. Papers were eligible for inclusion if they reported findings about patient or provider experiences. Two reviewers screened studies for inclusion; 40 studies were included. We used a data-based convergent synthesis design to extract and synthesize findings, and the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients and providers hold generally positive views of tele-bupe and most support its continued use in some form, citing multiple benefits, including accessibility and convenience. Most studies also identified barriers to tele-bupe, including technological challenges. Patients and providers differed in how they thought telehealth affects the clinical relationship, with providers expressing more concern about rapport-building and patients stating that being in their own environments during visits facilitated comfort and openness. The findings also suggest that providers are conflicted about when and for whom tele-bupe is appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall, both patients and providers view tele-bupe favorably; however, providers are conflicted about the patients and situations for which it is appropriate, which may lead to inequities in who is offered this form of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 112522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624014479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and loosening of some opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment regulations in the U.S. and Canada, there has been a rapid rise in the use of telehealth for buprenorphine induction, maintenance, and counseling (tele-bupe). Previous reviews highlight that tele-bupe can expand access to OUD care and improve treatment retention, but none to date have synthesized patient and clinician experiences with and perceptions of this care.

Objective

This review synthesized findings from quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies that examined patient and provider experiences with tele-bupe. We assessed the perceived effectiveness and acceptability of this treatment modality.

Methods

Our systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. In July 2023, we searched six databases using keywords ‘telehealth AND opioid use disorder’ (and related terms) for papers published in English. Papers were eligible for inclusion if they reported findings about patient or provider experiences. Two reviewers screened studies for inclusion; 40 studies were included. We used a data-based convergent synthesis design to extract and synthesize findings, and the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise studies.

Results

Patients and providers hold generally positive views of tele-bupe and most support its continued use in some form, citing multiple benefits, including accessibility and convenience. Most studies also identified barriers to tele-bupe, including technological challenges. Patients and providers differed in how they thought telehealth affects the clinical relationship, with providers expressing more concern about rapport-building and patients stating that being in their own environments during visits facilitated comfort and openness. The findings also suggest that providers are conflicted about when and for whom tele-bupe is appropriate.

Conclusion

Overall, both patients and providers view tele-bupe favorably; however, providers are conflicted about the patients and situations for which it is appropriate, which may lead to inequities in who is offered this form of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过远程医疗提供阿片类药物使用障碍护理的患者和提供者经验:一项系统的混合研究综述。
导论:自2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行开始以及美国和加拿大一些阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗法规的放松以来,丁丙诺啡诱导、维持和咨询(远程医疗)的远程医疗使用迅速增加。以前的评论强调,远程通话可以扩大OUD护理的可及性,并提高治疗的保留性,但迄今为止没有一篇综述综合了患者和临床医生对这种护理的经验和看法。目的:本综述综合了定量、定性和混合方法研究的结果,这些研究检查了远程医疗的患者和提供者的经验。我们评估了这种治疗方式的感知有效性和可接受性。方法:我们的系统评价遵循PRISMA 2020指南。在2023年7月,我们使用关键词“远程医疗和阿片类药物使用障碍”(及相关术语)搜索了六个数据库,以获取发表的英文论文。如果论文报告了有关患者或提供者经验的发现,则有资格纳入。两位审稿人筛选研究纳入;纳入了40项研究。我们使用基于数据的聚合综合设计来提取和综合研究结果,并使用混合方法评估工具来评估研究。结果:患者和医疗服务提供者普遍对远程电话持积极态度,大多数人支持以某种形式继续使用远程电话,并指出其多重好处,包括可及性和便利性。大多数研究还确定了电话通话的障碍,包括技术挑战。患者和提供者对远程保健如何影响临床关系的看法存在差异,提供者对建立融洽关系表示更多关注,而患者则表示,在访问期间在自己的环境中有助于舒适和开放。调查结果还表明,供应商在何时以及对谁来说电话通话是合适的问题上存在分歧。结论:总体而言,患者和医疗服务提供者对远程医疗持积极态度;然而,提供者对患者和适合的情况存在矛盾,这可能导致谁被提供这种形式的护理的不公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
期刊最新文献
Long-term use of Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs: A register-based cohort study in Taiwan Achieving SVR is associated with long term reduced hazardous alcohol use for people who inject drugs receiving HCV treatment: The HERO study Sleep disturbance is associated with greater subjective and neural negative emotionality in people with alcohol use disorder The intersectionality of cannabis use and depression symptoms on functional brain topology in adults Association between the initiation of strong chū-hai consumption and the incidence of hazardous and harmful alcohol use in Japan: An online survey-based cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1