Exploring the ethics of using fictional stories for health education on social media to share information and emotions about the HPV vaccine: A cross-sectional study with interdisciplinary health experts.

Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-02-06 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126575
Philip M Massey, Regan M Murray, Kelli Kostizak, Wen-Juo Lo, Michael Yudell
{"title":"Exploring the ethics of using fictional stories for health education on social media to share information and emotions about the HPV vaccine: A cross-sectional study with interdisciplinary health experts.","authors":"Philip M Massey, Regan M Murray, Kelli Kostizak, Wen-Juo Lo, Michael Yudell","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media is used to promote the HPV vaccine through various strategies, including the use of stories and narratives. Understanding the ethical concerns related to the use of social media in this capacity are important. The purpose of this study is to identify ethical concerns of using fictional stories to share information and emotions about the HPV vaccine on social media, ultimately to influence parents on their decision to vaccinate their child.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey with researchers in the fields of health communication, cancer prevention, social media, and public health ethics from October to December 2021. Respondents were presented with a fictional story that consisted of seven connected vignettes about the HPV vaccine. For each vignette, respondents were asked to rate the potential benefits and risk, as well as the potential for ethical concerns of using the fictional narrative style to share information about the HPV vaccine. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, respondents (n = 41) perceived more benefits than risks when it comes to 1) using social media for health education generally and 2) using a story with connected vignettes for vaccine communication. The vignettes prioritizing vaccine hesitancy, positive emotion, and health equity were seen as having the most potential benefit, while the vignettes highlighting vaccine confidence and skepticism were seen as having the most potential risk. Overall, respondents felt there were several ethical concerns of note - persuasion was the most common (15 % of respondents) followed by deception (9 %) and manipulation (8 %). Qualitative data highlighted the importance of transparency and trust to avoid ethical violations and negative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ethical concerns exist when using fictional stories to share health information on social media, particularly as new online technologies make it harder to tell fact from fiction. Practical and actionable recommendations for researchers must be developed, defining a range of ethical responsibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":" ","pages":"126575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media is used to promote the HPV vaccine through various strategies, including the use of stories and narratives. Understanding the ethical concerns related to the use of social media in this capacity are important. The purpose of this study is to identify ethical concerns of using fictional stories to share information and emotions about the HPV vaccine on social media, ultimately to influence parents on their decision to vaccinate their child.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with researchers in the fields of health communication, cancer prevention, social media, and public health ethics from October to December 2021. Respondents were presented with a fictional story that consisted of seven connected vignettes about the HPV vaccine. For each vignette, respondents were asked to rate the potential benefits and risk, as well as the potential for ethical concerns of using the fictional narrative style to share information about the HPV vaccine. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically.

Results: On average, respondents (n = 41) perceived more benefits than risks when it comes to 1) using social media for health education generally and 2) using a story with connected vignettes for vaccine communication. The vignettes prioritizing vaccine hesitancy, positive emotion, and health equity were seen as having the most potential benefit, while the vignettes highlighting vaccine confidence and skepticism were seen as having the most potential risk. Overall, respondents felt there were several ethical concerns of note - persuasion was the most common (15 % of respondents) followed by deception (9 %) and manipulation (8 %). Qualitative data highlighted the importance of transparency and trust to avoid ethical violations and negative outcomes.

Conclusions: Ethical concerns exist when using fictional stories to share health information on social media, particularly as new online technologies make it harder to tell fact from fiction. Practical and actionable recommendations for researchers must be developed, defining a range of ethical responsibilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索在社交媒体上使用虚构故事进行健康教育的伦理,以分享有关HPV疫苗的信息和情感:与跨学科卫生专家的横断面研究。
社交媒体被用来通过各种策略来推广HPV疫苗,包括使用故事和叙述。了解在这种情况下使用社交媒体的伦理问题是很重要的。本研究的目的是确定使用虚构故事在社交媒体上分享有关HPV疫苗的信息和情绪的伦理问题,最终影响父母为孩子接种疫苗的决定。方法:我们于2021年10 - 12月对健康传播、癌症预防、社交媒体和公共卫生伦理等领域的研究人员进行了横断面调查。受访者被呈现了一个虚构的故事,由七个有关HPV疫苗的相互关联的小插曲组成。对于每个小插曲,受访者被要求评估潜在的好处和风险,以及使用虚构的叙事风格来分享有关HPV疫苗的信息的潜在伦理问题。描述性统计汇总反应,定性数据进行主题分析。结果:平均而言,受访者(n = 41)在以下方面认为益处大于风险:1)一般使用社交媒体进行健康教育;2)使用带有相关小片段的故事进行疫苗传播。优先考虑疫苗犹豫、积极情绪和健康公平的小插曲被认为具有最大的潜在益处,而强调疫苗信心和怀疑的小插曲被认为具有最大的潜在风险。总的来说,受访者认为有几个值得注意的道德问题——说服是最常见的(15%的受访者),其次是欺骗(9%)和操纵(8%)。定性数据强调了透明度和信任对避免违反道德和负面后果的重要性。结论:在社交媒体上使用虚构故事分享健康信息时存在伦理问题,特别是在新的在线技术使事实与虚构更难区分的情况下。必须为研究人员制定切实可行的建议,确定一系列伦理责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A neuraminidase-based inactivated influenza virus vaccine significantly reduced virus replication and pathology following homologous challenge in swine. Vaccine safety surveillance in South Africa through COVID-19: A journey to systems strengthening. Comprehensive humoral and cellular immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in adults with cancer. Predictors of HPV vaccination coverage among adolescents in Tennessee during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Pseudovirus nanoparticles targeting the receptor binding HA1 domains of influenza viruses elicited high HA1-specific antibody responses and protected mice against mortality caused by influenza virus challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1