Modifiable risk factors for dementia in India: A cross-sectional study revisiting estimates and reassessing prevention potential and priorities.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001362
Marco Angrisani, Emma Nichols, Erik Meijer, Alden L Gross, Joshua R Ehrlich, Mathew Varghese, Kenneth M Langa, A B Dey, Sara D Adar, Jinkook Lee
{"title":"Modifiable risk factors for dementia in India: A cross-sectional study revisiting estimates and reassessing prevention potential and priorities.","authors":"Marco Angrisani, Emma Nichols, Erik Meijer, Alden L Gross, Joshua R Ehrlich, Mathew Varghese, Kenneth M Langa, A B Dey, Sara D Adar, Jinkook Lee","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About 16% of worldwide dementia cases are in India. Evaluating the prospects for dementia prevention in India requires knowledge of context-specific risk factors, as relationships between risk factors and dementia observed in high-income countries (HICs) may not apply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We computed population attributable fractions (PAFs) for dementia in India by estimating associations between risk factors and dementia, their prevalence and communality, within the same nationally representative sample of 4,096 Indians aged 60 and older, surveyed through the Harmonized Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia for the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI-DAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk factor with the largest PAF (>20%) was no education, followed by vision impairment (14%), physical inactivity (12%), and social isolation (8%). According to our estimates, eliminating exposure to risk factors significantly associated with dementia would potentially prevent up to 70% of dementia cases in India.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Previous estimates, based on samples limited to specific geographic areas and using risk factors' definitions and relative risks from HICs, may not correctly estimate the real opportunities for preventing dementia in India or identify the most critical areas for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: About 16% of worldwide dementia cases are in India. Evaluating the prospects for dementia prevention in India requires knowledge of context-specific risk factors, as relationships between risk factors and dementia observed in high-income countries (HICs) may not apply.

Methods: We computed population attributable fractions (PAFs) for dementia in India by estimating associations between risk factors and dementia, their prevalence and communality, within the same nationally representative sample of 4,096 Indians aged 60 and older, surveyed through the Harmonized Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia for the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI-DAD).

Results: The risk factor with the largest PAF (>20%) was no education, followed by vision impairment (14%), physical inactivity (12%), and social isolation (8%). According to our estimates, eliminating exposure to risk factors significantly associated with dementia would potentially prevent up to 70% of dementia cases in India.

Discussion: Previous estimates, based on samples limited to specific geographic areas and using risk factors' definitions and relative risks from HICs, may not correctly estimate the real opportunities for preventing dementia in India or identify the most critical areas for intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度痴呆症的可改变危险因素:一项横断面研究,重新评估和重新评估预防潜力和优先事项。
背景:全球约16%的痴呆病例发生在印度。评估印度预防痴呆症的前景需要了解具体情况的风险因素,因为在高收入国家观察到的风险因素与痴呆症之间的关系可能并不适用。方法:我们在4096名60岁及以上的印度人的相同全国代表性样本中,通过印度纵向老龄化研究的痴呆症统一诊断评估(LASI-DAD),通过估计危险因素与痴呆症之间的关联、患病率和社区,计算了印度痴呆症的人口归因分数(paf)。结果:PAF最大的危险因素是未受教育(>20%),其次是视力障碍(14%)、缺乏身体活动(12%)和社会孤立(8%)。根据我们的估计,消除与痴呆症显著相关的风险因素可能会预防印度高达70%的痴呆症病例。讨论:以前的估计,基于仅限于特定地理区域的样本,并使用危险因素的定义和来自高收入国家的相对风险,可能无法正确估计印度预防痴呆症的真正机会或确定最关键的干预领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Problem of pain in the USA: evaluating the generalisability of high-impact chronic pain models over time using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. Characterising the killing of girls and women in urban settings in Latin America, 2000–2019: an analysis of variability and time trends using mortality data from vital registration systems Correction: Improving influenza vaccine uptake in clinical risk groups: patient, provider and commissioner perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of expanding delivery pathways in England ‘Two sides of the same coin’? A longitudinal analysis evaluating whether financial austerity accelerated NHS privatisation in England 2013-2020 Client perspectives on creating supportive sexual health environments for people with persistent anxiety: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1