Balancing peer preference and payoff pursuit in migration shapes social cohesion within unequal endowment populations

IF 5.3 1区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Chaos Solitons & Fractals Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115878
Xiaoyue Wang , Zhixue He , Ju Chen , Mingjuan Zhang , Lei Shi
{"title":"Balancing peer preference and payoff pursuit in migration shapes social cohesion within unequal endowment populations","authors":"Xiaoyue Wang ,&nbsp;Zhixue He ,&nbsp;Ju Chen ,&nbsp;Mingjuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social cohesion, defined by mutual cooperation and robust social connections, is fundamental for addressing collective challenges. With the growing prevalence of inequality in modern societies, its potential impact on the formation of social cohesion cannot be overlooked. This study investigates social cohesion within a population by incorporating individuals with binary endowments (including both rich and poor) into a migration model. Individuals’ migration decisions are driven by both peer preference and payoff pursuit. Our results reveal diverse spatial patterns: while peer preference leads to small, scattered clusters, payoff pursuit promotes spontaneous aggregation and sustains high levels of cooperation within the population, thereby enhancing social cohesion. In particular, interactions between rich and poor are critical for maintaining large-scale cooperation during self-organizing movements. However, excessive greed – manifested as high expectations or a strong pursuit of personal gain – can undermine social cohesion. Moreover, increasing endowment inequality further suppresses cooperation, weakening social cohesion. This study reveals the dynamics of social cohesion in populations with unequal endowments and provides new insights into the formation of social interaction, such as aggregation and segregation, through the lens of individual preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9764,"journal":{"name":"Chaos Solitons & Fractals","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 115878"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chaos Solitons & Fractals","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924014309","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social cohesion, defined by mutual cooperation and robust social connections, is fundamental for addressing collective challenges. With the growing prevalence of inequality in modern societies, its potential impact on the formation of social cohesion cannot be overlooked. This study investigates social cohesion within a population by incorporating individuals with binary endowments (including both rich and poor) into a migration model. Individuals’ migration decisions are driven by both peer preference and payoff pursuit. Our results reveal diverse spatial patterns: while peer preference leads to small, scattered clusters, payoff pursuit promotes spontaneous aggregation and sustains high levels of cooperation within the population, thereby enhancing social cohesion. In particular, interactions between rich and poor are critical for maintaining large-scale cooperation during self-organizing movements. However, excessive greed – manifested as high expectations or a strong pursuit of personal gain – can undermine social cohesion. Moreover, increasing endowment inequality further suppresses cooperation, weakening social cohesion. This study reveals the dynamics of social cohesion in populations with unequal endowments and provides new insights into the formation of social interaction, such as aggregation and segregation, through the lens of individual preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在移民中平衡同伴偏好和回报追求塑造了不平等禀赋人群中的社会凝聚力
以相互合作和强大的社会联系为定义的社会凝聚力是应对集体挑战的基础。随着不平等现象在现代社会日益普遍,其对社会凝聚力形成的潜在影响不容忽视。本研究通过将具有二元禀赋(包括富人和穷人)的个体纳入迁移模型来调查人口中的社会凝聚力。个体的迁移决策受到同伴偏好和收益追求的双重驱动。研究结果揭示了不同的空间格局:同伴偏好导致小而分散的群体,而回报追求促进自发聚集,维持群体内部的高水平合作,从而增强社会凝聚力。特别是,在自组织运动中,富人和穷人之间的互动对于维持大规模合作至关重要。然而,过度的贪婪——表现为过高的期望或对个人利益的强烈追求——会破坏社会凝聚力。此外,禀赋不平等的加剧进一步抑制了合作,削弱了社会凝聚力。本研究揭示了在禀赋不平等的人群中社会凝聚力的动态变化,并通过个人偏好的视角为社会互动(如聚集和隔离)的形成提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chaos Solitons & Fractals
Chaos Solitons & Fractals 物理-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
1087
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals strives to establish itself as a premier journal in the interdisciplinary realm of Nonlinear Science, Non-equilibrium, and Complex Phenomena. It welcomes submissions covering a broad spectrum of topics within this field, including dynamics, non-equilibrium processes in physics, chemistry, and geophysics, complex matter and networks, mathematical models, computational biology, applications to quantum and mesoscopic phenomena, fluctuations and random processes, self-organization, and social phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Elastic interaction of second-order rogue matter waves for the modified Gross–Pitaevskii equation with time-dependent trapping potential and gain/loss Dynamically controllable two-color electromagnetically induced grating via spatially modulated inelastic two-wave mixing Optimizing Physics-Informed Neural Networks with hybrid activation functions: A comparative study on improving residual loss and accuracy using partial differential equations Dynamical analysis, multi-cavity control and DSP implementation of a novel memristive autapse neuron model emulating brain behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1