Characteristics of autoantibody-positive individuals without high-risk HLA-DR4-DQ8 or HLA-DR3-DQ2 haplotypes

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetologia Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1007/s00125-024-06338-7
Maria J. Redondo, David Cuthbertson, Andrea K. Steck, Kevan C. Herold, Richard Oram, Mark Atkinson, Todd M. Brusko, Hemang M. Parikh, Jeffrey P. Krischer, Suna Onengut-Gumuscu, Stephen S. Rich, Jay M. Sosenko
{"title":"Characteristics of autoantibody-positive individuals without high-risk HLA-DR4-DQ8 or HLA-DR3-DQ2 haplotypes","authors":"Maria J. Redondo, David Cuthbertson, Andrea K. Steck, Kevan C. Herold, Richard Oram, Mark Atkinson, Todd M. Brusko, Hemang M. Parikh, Jeffrey P. Krischer, Suna Onengut-Gumuscu, Stephen S. Rich, Jay M. Sosenko","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06338-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Many studies of type 1 diabetes pathogenesis focus on individuals with high-risk HLA haplotypes. We tested the hypothesis that, among islet autoantibody-positive individuals, lacking <i>HLA-DRB1*04-DQA1*03-DQB1*0302</i> (HLA-DR4-DQ8) and/or <i>HLA-DRB1*0301-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201</i> (HLA-DR3-DQ2) is associated with phenotypic differences, compared with those who have these high-risk HLA haplotypes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We classified autoantibody-positive relatives of individuals with type 1 diabetes into four groups based on having both HLA-DR4-DQ8 and HLA-DR3-DQ2 (DR3/DR4; <i>n</i>=1263), HLA-DR4-DQ8 but not HLA-DR3-DQ2 (DR4/non-DR3; <i>n</i>=2340), HLA-DR3-DQ2 but not HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DR3/non-DR4; <i>n</i>=1607) and neither HLA-DR3-DQ2 nor HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DRX/DRX; <i>n</i>=1294). Group comparisons included demographics, metabolic markers and the prevalence of autoantibodies against GAD65 (GADA%), IA-2 (IA-2A%) or insulin (IAA%) at enrolment. A <i>p</i> value &lt;0.01 was considered statistically significant.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>IA-2A% was lower in the DRX/DRX group (20.9%) than in the DR4/non-DR3 (38.5%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001) and DR3/DR4 (44.8%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001) groups, but similar to the DR3/non-DR4 group (20.0%). Conversely, IAA% was similar in the DRX/DRX (43.4%), DR4/non-DR3 (41.1%) and DR3/DR4 (41.0%) groups, but lower in the DR3/non-DR4 group (30.1%, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001). Participants in the DRX/DRX group were older, with a lower prevalence of White participants and a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity, and higher preserved C-peptide (as measured by a lower Index60) than those in the DR3/DR4 group (all comparisons, <i>p</i>&lt;0.005), a lower prevalence of White or non-Hispanic participants and a lower Index60 than those in the DR4/non-DR3 group, and younger age, a higher prevalence of Hispanic participants and a lower Index60 than those in the DR3/non-DR4 group (all comparisons, <i>p</i>&lt;0.005). Among the 1292 participants who progressed to clinical type 1 diabetes, those in the DR3/non-DR4 group had higher GADA%, lower IA-2A% and lower IAA% than the other groups (all comparisons, <i>p</i>&lt;0.01), and those in the DR3/DR4 group had the youngest age at diagnosis (all comparisons, <i>p</i>&lt;0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>Autoantibody-positive individuals who lack both high-risk HLA haplotypes (DRX/DRX) or have HLA-DR3-DQ2 but lack HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DR3/non-DR4) have phenotypic differences compared with DR3/DR4 and DR4/non-DR3 individuals, suggesting that there is aetiological heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06338-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Many studies of type 1 diabetes pathogenesis focus on individuals with high-risk HLA haplotypes. We tested the hypothesis that, among islet autoantibody-positive individuals, lacking HLA-DRB1*04-DQA1*03-DQB1*0302 (HLA-DR4-DQ8) and/or HLA-DRB1*0301-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201 (HLA-DR3-DQ2) is associated with phenotypic differences, compared with those who have these high-risk HLA haplotypes.

Methods

We classified autoantibody-positive relatives of individuals with type 1 diabetes into four groups based on having both HLA-DR4-DQ8 and HLA-DR3-DQ2 (DR3/DR4; n=1263), HLA-DR4-DQ8 but not HLA-DR3-DQ2 (DR4/non-DR3; n=2340), HLA-DR3-DQ2 but not HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DR3/non-DR4; n=1607) and neither HLA-DR3-DQ2 nor HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DRX/DRX; n=1294). Group comparisons included demographics, metabolic markers and the prevalence of autoantibodies against GAD65 (GADA%), IA-2 (IA-2A%) or insulin (IAA%) at enrolment. A p value <0.01 was considered statistically significant.

Results

IA-2A% was lower in the DRX/DRX group (20.9%) than in the DR4/non-DR3 (38.5%, p<0.001) and DR3/DR4 (44.8%, p<0.001) groups, but similar to the DR3/non-DR4 group (20.0%). Conversely, IAA% was similar in the DRX/DRX (43.4%), DR4/non-DR3 (41.1%) and DR3/DR4 (41.0%) groups, but lower in the DR3/non-DR4 group (30.1%, p<0.001). Participants in the DRX/DRX group were older, with a lower prevalence of White participants and a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity, and higher preserved C-peptide (as measured by a lower Index60) than those in the DR3/DR4 group (all comparisons, p<0.005), a lower prevalence of White or non-Hispanic participants and a lower Index60 than those in the DR4/non-DR3 group, and younger age, a higher prevalence of Hispanic participants and a lower Index60 than those in the DR3/non-DR4 group (all comparisons, p<0.005). Among the 1292 participants who progressed to clinical type 1 diabetes, those in the DR3/non-DR4 group had higher GADA%, lower IA-2A% and lower IAA% than the other groups (all comparisons, p<0.01), and those in the DR3/DR4 group had the youngest age at diagnosis (all comparisons, p<0.001).

Conclusions/interpretation

Autoantibody-positive individuals who lack both high-risk HLA haplotypes (DRX/DRX) or have HLA-DR3-DQ2 but lack HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DR3/non-DR4) have phenotypic differences compared with DR3/DR4 and DR4/non-DR3 individuals, suggesting that there is aetiological heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes.

Graphical Abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无高危HLA-DR4-DQ8或HLA-DR3-DQ2单倍型的自身抗体阳性个体的特征
目的/假说许多有关 1 型糖尿病发病机制的研究都集中在具有高风险 HLA 单倍型的个体上。我们检验了这样一个假设:在胰岛自身抗体阳性的个体中,缺乏 HLA-DRB1*04-DQA1*03-DQB1*0302 (HLA-DR4-DQ8)和/或 HLA-DRB1*0301-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201 (HLA-DR3-DQ2)与具有这些高风险 HLA 单倍型的个体相比,与表型差异相关。方法我们根据同时具有 HLA-DR4-DQ8 和 HLA-DR3-DQ2 (DR3/DR4;n=1263)、HLA-DR4-DQ8 但无 HLA-DR3-DQ2 (DR4/non-DR3;n=2340)、HLA-DR3-DQ2 但无 HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DR3/non-DR4;n=1607)和既无 HLA-DR3-DQ2 也无 HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DRX/DRX;n=1294)四组。组间比较包括人口统计学、代谢指标和入组时针对 GAD65(GADA%)、IA-2(IA-2A%)或胰岛素(IAA%)的自身抗体患病率。结果IA-2A%在DRX/DRX组(20.9%)低于DR4/非DR3组(38.5%,p<0.001)和DR3/DR4组(44.8%,p<0.001),但与DR3/非DR4组(20.0%)相似。相反,IAA% 在 DRX/DRX(43.4%)、DR4/非 DR3(41.1%)和 DR3/DR4(41.0%)组中相似,但在 DR3/非 DR4 组中较低(30.1%,p<0.001)。与 DR3/DR4 组相比,DRX/DRX 组的参与者年龄较大,白人比例较低,超重/肥胖比例较高,保存的 C 肽较高(以较低的 Index60 衡量)(所有比较,p<0.005),与 DR4/非 DR3 组相比,白人或非西班牙裔参与者比例较低,指数 60 较低;与 DR3/非 DR4 组相比,西班牙裔参与者年龄较小,比例较高,指数 60 较低(所有比较,p<0.005)。在进展为临床 1 型糖尿病的 1292 名参与者中,DR3/非 DR4 组参与者的 GADA%、IA-2A% 和 IAA% 均高于其他组别(所有比较,p<0.01),DR3/DR4 组参与者的诊断年龄最小(所有比较,p<0.001)。结论/解释与 DR3/DR4 和 DR4/non-DR3 组相比,缺乏高风险 HLA 单倍型 (DRX/DRX) 或具有 HLA-DR3-DQ2 但缺乏 HLA-DR4-DQ8 (DR3/non-DR4) 的自身抗体阳性者具有表型差异,这表明 1 型糖尿病存在病因异质性。图文摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Correction: A whole-food, plant-based intensive lifestyle intervention improves glycaemic control and reduces medications in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Correction: Applying technologies to simplify strategies for exercise in type 1 diabetes. Autoimmune diseases and the risk and prognosis of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. Characterising impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia and associated risks through HypoA-Q: findings from a T1D Exchange cohort. Diabetes knowledge and behaviour: a cross-sectional study of Jordanian adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1