The effects of different metacognitive patterns on students' self-regulated learning in blended learning

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105211
Xingyu Geng, Yu-Sheng Su
{"title":"The effects of different metacognitive patterns on students' self-regulated learning in blended learning","authors":"Xingyu Geng, Yu-Sheng Su","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-regulated learning has significant importance in blended learning, necessitating an exploration into the effects of metacognition on SRL. Furthermore, SRL exhibits interdependence, thus highlighting the urgent need for research that can capture the temporal processes of SRL in multi-task activities during blended learning. Over 18 weeks, 44 students participated in three SRL tasks designed for blended learning. Students completed a questionnaire assessing their metacognitive awareness at the end of the course. A two-step cluster analysis was employed to explore different metacognitive patterns among students: high metacognitive knowledge and regulation students and low metacognitive knowledge and regulation students. Furthermore, data from student's learning diaries were collected and coded based on the SRL model specific to blended learning. Epistemic Network Analysis, a computer-assisted learning analysis method, was employed to investigate the SRL process of students with different metacognitive patterns in various tasks of blended learning. First, the findings indicate that both types of students strive for performance achievement; however, students with high metacognitive knowledge and regulation primarily employ task strategies, while those with low metacognitive knowledge and regulation focus on time management. Moreover, a detailed centroid analysis conducted for each task revealed that students with high metacognitive knowledge and regulation initiate their SRL process in computer-assisted blended learning with self-efficacy and conclude it with goal setting. Conversely, students with low metacognitive knowledge and regulation commence their SRL process with self-efficacy and conclude it by employing strategies for self-evaluation. Finally, implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"119 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105211","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-regulated learning has significant importance in blended learning, necessitating an exploration into the effects of metacognition on SRL. Furthermore, SRL exhibits interdependence, thus highlighting the urgent need for research that can capture the temporal processes of SRL in multi-task activities during blended learning. Over 18 weeks, 44 students participated in three SRL tasks designed for blended learning. Students completed a questionnaire assessing their metacognitive awareness at the end of the course. A two-step cluster analysis was employed to explore different metacognitive patterns among students: high metacognitive knowledge and regulation students and low metacognitive knowledge and regulation students. Furthermore, data from student's learning diaries were collected and coded based on the SRL model specific to blended learning. Epistemic Network Analysis, a computer-assisted learning analysis method, was employed to investigate the SRL process of students with different metacognitive patterns in various tasks of blended learning. First, the findings indicate that both types of students strive for performance achievement; however, students with high metacognitive knowledge and regulation primarily employ task strategies, while those with low metacognitive knowledge and regulation focus on time management. Moreover, a detailed centroid analysis conducted for each task revealed that students with high metacognitive knowledge and regulation initiate their SRL process in computer-assisted blended learning with self-efficacy and conclude it with goal setting. Conversely, students with low metacognitive knowledge and regulation commence their SRL process with self-efficacy and conclude it by employing strategies for self-evaluation. Finally, implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合学习中不同元认知模式对学生自主学习的影响
自我调节学习在混合式学习中具有重要意义,因此有必要探讨元认知对混合式学习的影响。此外,SRL表现出相互依赖性,因此迫切需要对混合学习中多任务活动中SRL的时间过程进行研究。在18周的时间里,44名学生参与了为混合式学习设计的三个SRL任务。学生们在课程结束时完成了一份评估他们元认知意识的问卷。采用两步聚类分析的方法,探讨高元认知知识和规则型学生与低元认知知识和规则型学生的元认知模式差异。此外,我们还收集了学生学习日记的数据,并基于混合学习的SRL模型进行编码。采用计算机辅助学习分析方法——认知网络分析(Epistemic Network Analysis),研究了不同元认知模式学生在混合学习任务中的SRL过程。首先,研究结果表明,两种类型的学生都努力取得成绩;然而,高元认知知识和调节的学生主要使用任务策略,而低元认知知识和调节的学生主要使用时间管理。此外,对每个任务进行了详细的质心分析,发现具有较高元认知知识和调节能力的学生在计算机辅助混合学习过程中以自我效能感启动SRL过程,并以目标设定结束SRL过程。相反,元认知知识和调节能力低的学生,其自我认知过程以自我效能感开始,并以自我评价策略结束。最后,对研究的意义、局限性和未来的研究方向进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Explicit video-based instruction enhanced students’ online credibility evaluation skills: Did storifying instruction matter? Can AI support human grading? Examining machine attention and confidence in short answer scoring The role of perceived teacher support in students’ attitudes towards and flow experience in programming learning: A multi-group analysis of primary students A Topical Review of Research in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Questions and Possibilities How do Chinese undergraduates harness the potential of appraisal and emotions in generative AI-Powered learning? A multigroup analysis based on appraisal theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1