The effects of different metacognitive patterns on students' self-regulated learning in blended learning

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105211
Xingyu Geng, Yu-Sheng Su
{"title":"The effects of different metacognitive patterns on students' self-regulated learning in blended learning","authors":"Xingyu Geng, Yu-Sheng Su","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-regulated learning has significant importance in blended learning, necessitating an exploration into the effects of metacognition on SRL. Furthermore, SRL exhibits interdependence, thus highlighting the urgent need for research that can capture the temporal processes of SRL in multi-task activities during blended learning. Over 18 weeks, 44 students participated in three SRL tasks designed for blended learning. Students completed a questionnaire assessing their metacognitive awareness at the end of the course. A two-step cluster analysis was employed to explore different metacognitive patterns among students: high metacognitive knowledge and regulation students and low metacognitive knowledge and regulation students. Furthermore, data from student's learning diaries were collected and coded based on the SRL model specific to blended learning. Epistemic Network Analysis, a computer-assisted learning analysis method, was employed to investigate the SRL process of students with different metacognitive patterns in various tasks of blended learning. First, the findings indicate that both types of students strive for performance achievement; however, students with high metacognitive knowledge and regulation primarily employ task strategies, while those with low metacognitive knowledge and regulation focus on time management. Moreover, a detailed centroid analysis conducted for each task revealed that students with high metacognitive knowledge and regulation initiate their SRL process in computer-assisted blended learning with self-efficacy and conclude it with goal setting. Conversely, students with low metacognitive knowledge and regulation commence their SRL process with self-efficacy and conclude it by employing strategies for self-evaluation. Finally, implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"119 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105211","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-regulated learning has significant importance in blended learning, necessitating an exploration into the effects of metacognition on SRL. Furthermore, SRL exhibits interdependence, thus highlighting the urgent need for research that can capture the temporal processes of SRL in multi-task activities during blended learning. Over 18 weeks, 44 students participated in three SRL tasks designed for blended learning. Students completed a questionnaire assessing their metacognitive awareness at the end of the course. A two-step cluster analysis was employed to explore different metacognitive patterns among students: high metacognitive knowledge and regulation students and low metacognitive knowledge and regulation students. Furthermore, data from student's learning diaries were collected and coded based on the SRL model specific to blended learning. Epistemic Network Analysis, a computer-assisted learning analysis method, was employed to investigate the SRL process of students with different metacognitive patterns in various tasks of blended learning. First, the findings indicate that both types of students strive for performance achievement; however, students with high metacognitive knowledge and regulation primarily employ task strategies, while those with low metacognitive knowledge and regulation focus on time management. Moreover, a detailed centroid analysis conducted for each task revealed that students with high metacognitive knowledge and regulation initiate their SRL process in computer-assisted blended learning with self-efficacy and conclude it with goal setting. Conversely, students with low metacognitive knowledge and regulation commence their SRL process with self-efficacy and conclude it by employing strategies for self-evaluation. Finally, implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
“Digital constructivists, activators or presenters? Different profiles of technology integration among swiss upper secondary school teachers” Preventing digital distraction in secondary classrooms: A quasi-experimental study How does social support detected automatically in discussion forums relate to online learning burnout? The moderating role of students’ self-regulated learning Virtual vs. Traditional Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies The effects of different metacognitive patterns on students' self-regulated learning in blended learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1