Kanglin Tian, Claire Farrell, Anna Lintern, Yussi M. Palacios, Christopher Szota, Brandon Winfrey
{"title":"Does mycorrhizal colonization of biofilter plants improve their water uptake or drought resistance?","authors":"Kanglin Tian, Claire Farrell, Anna Lintern, Yussi M. Palacios, Christopher Szota, Brandon Winfrey","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stormwater biofilter systems can provide at-source pollutant removal and runoff reduction. However, vegetation in biofilters systems can be prone to drought stress, reducing plant health and survival in between rainfall events. Mycorrhizal colonization has been shown to improve nutrient removal in stormwater biofilter systems, but it is not yet known whether mycorrhizal colonization of biofilter plants can improve their water use or resistance to drought stress. We used a pot dry-down experiment to determine whether mycorrhizal colonization differs among six common biofilter plant species and whether it improves their water use or changes their drought resistance. We measured evapotranspiration (ET) during a well-watered (WW) phase before commencing a water-deficit (WD) phase, where pots were no longer watered. Predawn and midday water leaf water potentials were measured when plants had effectively ceased ET. Water use during the WW phase ranged between 4.6 and 5.9 mm day-1 and there was no significant difference in evapotranspiration between inoculated and control treatments. Cumulative water use during the WD phase was also unaffected by mycorrhizal colonization. Species with greater biomass ceased ET earlier than those with less biomass. While greater colonization was correlated with greater biomass, there was no significant difference in biomass between control and inoculated plants. These results suggest that mycorrhizal inoculation does not improve plant water use or drought resistance in biofilters. However, as all plants were drought avoiders, they are unlikely to experience drought stress regularly, unless the period between rainfall events is substantial.","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stormwater biofilter systems can provide at-source pollutant removal and runoff reduction. However, vegetation in biofilters systems can be prone to drought stress, reducing plant health and survival in between rainfall events. Mycorrhizal colonization has been shown to improve nutrient removal in stormwater biofilter systems, but it is not yet known whether mycorrhizal colonization of biofilter plants can improve their water use or resistance to drought stress. We used a pot dry-down experiment to determine whether mycorrhizal colonization differs among six common biofilter plant species and whether it improves their water use or changes their drought resistance. We measured evapotranspiration (ET) during a well-watered (WW) phase before commencing a water-deficit (WD) phase, where pots were no longer watered. Predawn and midday water leaf water potentials were measured when plants had effectively ceased ET. Water use during the WW phase ranged between 4.6 and 5.9 mm day-1 and there was no significant difference in evapotranspiration between inoculated and control treatments. Cumulative water use during the WD phase was also unaffected by mycorrhizal colonization. Species with greater biomass ceased ET earlier than those with less biomass. While greater colonization was correlated with greater biomass, there was no significant difference in biomass between control and inoculated plants. These results suggest that mycorrhizal inoculation does not improve plant water use or drought resistance in biofilters. However, as all plants were drought avoiders, they are unlikely to experience drought stress regularly, unless the period between rainfall events is substantial.
雨水生物过滤系统可以从源头去除污染物并减少径流。然而,生物过滤系统中的植被可能容易受到干旱胁迫,在降雨事件之间降低植物的健康和存活率。菌根定植已被证明可以改善雨水生物过滤系统中的营养物质去除,但尚不清楚菌根定植是否可以改善生物过滤植物的水分利用或对干旱胁迫的抵抗力。我们采用盆栽干燥实验来确定6种常见生物过滤器植物的菌根定殖是否不同,以及它是否提高了它们的水分利用或改变了它们的抗旱性。我们在水分充足(WW)阶段测量了蒸散(ET),然后开始缺水(WD)阶段,在这个阶段,花盆不再浇水。当植物有效停止蒸散发时,测量了黎明前和中午的水分叶片水势。WW期的水分利用范围在4.6 ~ 5.9 mm day-1之间,接种处理和对照处理之间的蒸散量没有显著差异。WD期的累积耗水量也不受菌根定植的影响。生物量大的物种比生物量小的物种更早停止ET。定殖量越大,生物量越大,但对照植株和接种植株的生物量差异不显著。这些结果表明,接种菌根并不能提高生物滤池中植物的水分利用或抗旱性。然而,由于所有的植物都是干旱回避者,它们不太可能经常经历干旱压力,除非降雨事件之间的时间很长。
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.