Does mindfulness facilitate letting be? A longitudinal investigation of nonattachment as a mediator in the association between mindfulness, well-being, and affect at trait and state levels

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Applied psychology. Health and well-being Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1111/aphw.12634
Ben C. L. Yu, Jacky C. K. Ng, Floria H. N. Chio, Winnie W. S. Mak
{"title":"Does mindfulness facilitate letting be? A longitudinal investigation of nonattachment as a mediator in the association between mindfulness, well-being, and affect at trait and state levels","authors":"Ben C. L. Yu,&nbsp;Jacky C. K. Ng,&nbsp;Floria H. N. Chio,&nbsp;Winnie W. S. Mak","doi":"10.1111/aphw.12634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research investigated the mediating role of nonattachment in the association between mindfulness and well-being. Study 1, a 2-week ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study with 2446 responses from 69 participants, showed that state mindfulness at time (<i>t</i>) − 1 was not significantly associated with nonattachment at <i>t</i> and (positive and negative) affect at <i>t</i> + 1. However, nonattachment at <i>t</i> significantly mediated the association between state mindfulness at <i>t</i> and (positive and negative) affect at <i>t</i>. Study 2, a 2-month study with three waves of measurement (<i>n</i> = 224), showed that trait mindfulness at baseline could not predict psychological well-being at 2-month follow-up through nonattachment at 1-month follow-up. However, this mediating relationship was significant when all these variables were measured at baseline. People who are mindful at one moment may experience higher nonattachment and better well-being at the same moment; the beneficial effect could not be sustained over time among people who are largely non-meditators.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.12634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigated the mediating role of nonattachment in the association between mindfulness and well-being. Study 1, a 2-week ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study with 2446 responses from 69 participants, showed that state mindfulness at time (t) − 1 was not significantly associated with nonattachment at t and (positive and negative) affect at t + 1. However, nonattachment at t significantly mediated the association between state mindfulness at t and (positive and negative) affect at t. Study 2, a 2-month study with three waves of measurement (n = 224), showed that trait mindfulness at baseline could not predict psychological well-being at 2-month follow-up through nonattachment at 1-month follow-up. However, this mediating relationship was significant when all these variables were measured at baseline. People who are mindful at one moment may experience higher nonattachment and better well-being at the same moment; the beneficial effect could not be sustained over time among people who are largely non-meditators.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念能促进顺其自然吗?在特质和状态水平上,不依恋作为正念、幸福感和情感之间的中介的纵向调查。
本研究探讨了不依恋在正念与幸福感之间的中介作用。研究1是一项为期2周的生态瞬间评估(EMA)研究,来自69名参与者的2446份回应显示,时间(t) - 1的状态正念与时间(t) - 1的非依恋和时间(t + 1)的(积极和消极)情感没有显著关联。然而,第1个月无依恋显著介导了第1个月状态正念与第1个月(积极和消极)情绪之间的关联。研究2是一项为期2个月的研究,有三波测量(n = 224),表明基线的特质正念不能通过第1个月的无依恋来预测第2个月随访时的心理健康。然而,当所有这些变量在基线测量时,这种中介关系是显著的。在某一时刻保持正念的人可能会同时体验到更高的不依恋和更好的幸福感;在大部分不冥想的人群中,这种有益的效果无法持续一段时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Comparing positive versus negative intrinsic rewards for predicting physical activity habit strength and frequency during a period of high stress Mindful bridge: Brief mindfulness practices alter negative emotion transmission and cooperative performance in parent–adolescent dynamics Happiness depletes me: Seeking happiness impairs limited resources and self-regulation Rooted in routine: Fostering higher order vegetable-shopping habits using a randomised simple planning intervention Is ‘me-time’ selfish?: Daily vitality crossover in dual-earner couples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1